On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 13:38:56 -0600
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
I don't see any of those in my /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter, where
would I normally see those or do I have to write them?
You'd have to write them, and if you don't need them you don't have to
write them.
Regards,
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013 21:24:53 -0700
Mark Costlow che...@swcp.com wrote:
Is it OK to call read_commands_file() from filter_relay? When I do, I
get this error:
Ah, no, sorry. I forgot... Sendmail does not assign a Queue-ID until
the MAIL FROM: stage.
I think the man page said it can only be
On 2013-11-25 7:55 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 13:38:56 -0600
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
I don't see any of those in my /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter, where
would I normally see those or do I have to write them?
You'd have to write them, and if you don't need
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 03:25:29PM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:16:16 -0600
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
Nov 22 13:43:22 cornelius mimedefang.pl[11099]: rAMJhIGv015058:
Message contains more than one Subject: header: and then some
subject line which I
On 2013-11-22 2:25 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
You should not call read_commands_file from filter_end. It should only
be called from filter_relay, filter_helo, filter_sender or filter_recipient
Hi David,
I don't see any of those in my /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter, where would I
normally see
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, Ben Kamen wrote:
I need a little quick help -- in my mimedefang milter, what can I put in
to bypass checking emails being relayed by my server submitted on 587 by
authorized users??
We have this near the top:
undef $good;
# SMTP Authentication
if (defined
Thanks for all the replies...
I don't actually need to worry about port number -- 465 or 587... as long as
the user has
authenticated, that's what I'm chasing after.
For Steffen,
I'm looking in /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter and don't see filter_recipient or
filter_sender.
(I'm on mimedefang
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
So to all (Like Joseph) , it looks like I can add this to filter_end
near/at the top -- returning the ACCEPT_AND_NO_MORE_FILTERING as
described in the following emails. Yes?
Just put it in before you do any action_bounce
Joseph Brennan
Columbia
On 2013-11-22 12:52 PM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
Just put it in before you do any action_bounce
Joseph Brennan
Got it -- thanks!
-ben
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
On 2013-11-22 1:09 PM, Ben Kamen wrote:
On 2013-11-22 12:52 PM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
Just put it in before you do any action_bounce
Joseph Brennan
Got it -- thanks!
Erm, I don't think that quite worked.
In my /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter, I have:
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:16:16 -0600
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
Nov 22 13:43:22 cornelius mimedefang.pl[11099]: rAMJhIGv015058:
Message contains more than one Subject: header: and then some
subject line which I removed for this post
You should not call read_commands_file from
Hey all,
I need a little quick help -- in my mimedefang milter, what can I put in to
bypass checking emails being relayed by my server submitted on 587 by
authorized users??
Thanks,
-Ben
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Nov 2013, Ben Kamen wrote:
I need a little quick help -- in my mimedefang milter, what can I put in to
bypass checking emails being relayed by my server submitted on 587 by
authorized users??
Check out %SendmailMacros, in
13 matches
Mail list logo