On Monday 03 May 2004 08:05, Damrose, Mark wrote:
> I do all my dnsbl checks at the sendmail level before MD is invoked.
>
> Is there anything else that SA uses those headers for?
Yes, SA uses those header for all kinds of header tests (e.g. message-id from
relay etc etc). As I said, doing so wi
From: Dirk Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thursday 29 April 2004 23:51, Damrose, Mark wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to turn
>> this back off?
>
> You really don't want them to be turned off, because then
> many spamassassin
> checks don't work properly and the scores are generally way to
On Thursday 29 April 2004 23:51, Damrose, Mark wrote:
> The man page states "By default" these headers are added, which
> would imply that this is optional. Is there a way to turn this back off?
You really don't want them to be turned off, because then many spamassassin
checks don't work proper
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Damrose, Mark wrote:
> I had custom SA rules to check for the non-existance of the Received
> header or the Message-ID header which I found to be fairly effective
> in helping catch direct to MX spam.
You can do this in your filter by opening ./HEADERS and counting the
number
Recently upgraded to MD 2.41 from 2.27.
This section of the man page caught my eye.
$AddApparentlyToForSpamAssassin
By default, MIMEDefang tries to pass SpamAssassin a message that
looks exactly like one it would receive via procmail. This
means adding a Received: header, addin
5 matches
Mail list logo
