On May 15, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Peter P. Benac wrote:
I run an Apache Web Server. When I create a virtual domain I add both
the
ServerName and ServerAlias directives to each. I know IIS has a
similar
convention.
Is it a lazy user or a lazy admin?
Lazy user. Because it's not about typing, i
I run an Apache Web Server. When I create a virtual domain I add both the
ServerName and ServerAlias directives to each. I know IIS has a similar
convention.
Is it a lazy user or a lazy admin?
My $.02 for what it's worth!!
Pete
>
> Am I the only one who finds this talk of "lazy users" a bit...
On 15 May 2006 at 12:06, Kelson wrote:
> > No, it's because it's not "store.domain.tld" (where you buy stuff from
> > the company) or "support.domain.tld" (where they provide support info),
> > etc.
>
> I'm not talking about www vs. other hostnames -- I'm talking about www
> vs. the plain doma
Jeff Rife wrote:
The only real use for the www. prefix is as a visual cue indicating that
the address refers to a website.
No, it's because it's not "store.domain.tld" (where you buy stuff from
the company) or "support.domain.tld" (where they provide support info),
etc.
I'm not talking abou
On 15 May 2006 at 10:41, Kelson wrote:
> Really, the only reason websites tend to be named www.example.com these
> days is tradition.
Well, yes. That's the "tradition" for the *default* website for a
domain. Other websites at that domain may have different hostnames.
Almost every major domai
As a sidenote, I do remember reading (although I can't remember where)
that it's considered bad form to assign an IP address to a domain.
IP's should be assigned to hosts...
Anyone else ever read that? I can't remember if it was an RFC or what.
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
=
On 5/15/06, Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David F. Skoll wrote:
> (although it does have one, to catch people who are too lazy to type
> www. into their browsers.)
<---SNIP--->
Am I the only one who finds this talk of "lazy users" a bit... I don't
know, condescending? (Admittedly, this is
Kelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/15/2006 01:41:17 PM:
> The only real use for the www. prefix is as a visual cue indicating that
> the address refers to a website. It's shorter and more aesthetically
> pleasing than http:// It's certainly not easy in speech. "double-u
> double-u double-u
David F. Skoll wrote:
(although it does have one, to catch people who are too lazy to type
www. into their browsers.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Usually, domain.tld would be the same as www.domain.tld, registered
for those too lazy to type "www." as part of the address. Of course
marketing ty
9 matches
Mail list logo
