Marcus Schopen wrote:
Am Freitag, den 24.08.2018, 10:50 -0400 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
I think this is a terrible idea for two reasons:
1) What is the recipient supposed to do with the notification? Most
recipients are not technically savvy and are more likely to panic
than
do anything else.
Th
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 23:35:54 +0200
Marcus Schopen wrote:
> That might me right in most of the cases. But if you do a "silent"
> reject, this has to be communicated very clearly to the recipient, as
> well as rejecting at a spamassassin score of >= 5. This is nothing you
> can decide on your own a
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.08.2018, 10:50 -0400 schrieb Dianne Skoll:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:10:41 +0200
> Marcus Schopen wrote:
>
> > That's why I want to reject it, but inform the recipient -
> > not the sender - about the rejection.
>
> I think this is a terrible idea for two reasons:
>
> 1)
Apparently MIMEDefang has no action_notify_recpients() feature,
presumably because of the dangers Dianne described. resend_message()
isn't quite the right thing, either, but may have code you can
repurpose.
If you are willing to risk the dangers of both bouncing and forwarding
a message, then in
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:10:41 +0200
Marcus Schopen wrote:
> That's why I want to reject it, but inform the recipient -
> not the sender - about the rejection.
I think this is a terrible idea for two reasons:
1) What is the recipient supposed to do with the notification? Most
recipients are not
On 2018-08-24 11:10, Marcus Schopen wrote:
I don't agree. Rejecting a virus email means not receiving it from the
law side. If you accept an email or just drop it, the problem is on
your side. That's why I want to reject it, but inform the recipient -
not the sender - about the rejection. I agr
Am Freitag, den 24.08.2018, 08:42 + schrieb Paul Murphy:
> > > a REJECT is not a bounce, its a denied to accept it
> > A REJECT is potentially likely to cause a bounce, but yeah... it
> > won't
>
> be backscatter from your machine.
>
> Plus a REJECT is only possible if you don't stream by rec
>> a REJECT is not a bounce, its a denied to accept it
>A REJECT is potentially likely to cause a bounce, but yeah... it won't
be backscatter from your machine.
Plus a REJECT is only possible if you don't stream by recipient. If you have
streamed, it becomes a bounce. Either way, nobody cares
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 19:50:44 +0200
Benny Pedersen via MIMEDefang wrote:
> a REJECT is not a bounce, its a denied to accept it
A REJECT is potentially likely to cause a bounce, but yeah... it won't
be backscatter from your machine.
> i dont use mimedefang, its not very good examples of doing any
Am Donnerstag, den 23.08.2018, 19:50 +0200 schrieb Benny Pedersen via
MIMEDefang:
> Paul Murphy skrev den 2018-08-23 18:49:
> > Yes, but pointless - either just drop the attachment, or drop the
> > whole message with action_discard. Don't bounce it
>
> a REJECT is not a bounce, its a denied to ac
Paul Murphy skrev den 2018-08-23 18:49:
Yes, but pointless - either just drop the attachment, or drop the
whole message with action_discard. Don't bounce it
a REJECT is not a bounce, its a denied to accept it
- back scatter is
more likely to get you blacklisted than just about anything else
dress.
Paul.
-Original Message-
From: MIMEDefang [mailto:mimedefang-boun...@lists.roaringpenguin.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Schopen
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 4:50 PM
To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
Subject: [Mimedefang] action_drop_with_warning and refuse to sender
Hi,
in ca
Hi,
in case of a virus I'd like to refuse with a "554 5.7.1" and send a
warning email to the recipiet with "action_drop_with_warning". A
mixture of "action_bounce" and "action_drop_with_warning". Is that
possible?
Cheers
m
___
NOTE: If there is a discl
13 matches
Mail list logo
