On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
As some other discussion here on the list already brought up, the autobuilds
are all cross-compilers (for x86_64) and in my experience, they run a bit
slower on my machine. Don't know why, haven't tested it really,
My ears work fine. I even went so far as to get the GCC guys to fix
the install-strip target so that we can properly create a stripped
version. We just have to modify the buildbot to work with the new
target.
That's great news. FWIW, I'd recently run
for /r mingw-w64 %f in (*.exe) do strip
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:55 PM, NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
As some other discussion here on the list already brought up, the
autobuilds
are all cross-compilers (for x86_64) and in my experience,
2011/5/2 NightStrike nightstr...@gmail.com
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
As some other discussion here on the list already brought up, the
autobuilds
are all cross-compilers (for x86_64) and in my experience, they run a bit
slower on my
On 5/2/2011 22:48, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
I never implied your ears were defective. And I meant no offence, but I did
not get any reaction so I thought I'd stir things up a bit. You pursued a
better solution, which is great of course! Thanks for that.
Still leaves the /mingw directory and
On 5/3/2011 04:05, Kai Tietz wrote:
2011/5/2 Peter Rockett p.rock...@sheffield.ac.uk:
On 02/05/2011 17:00, Keith Marshall wrote:
On 02/05/11 16:30, Charles Wilson wrote:
So, we would like sqrt (x) and pow (x, 0.5) to agree.
The point below about off-topic diversions into precision is valid
