2011/8/8 Farkas Levente :
> On 08/08/2011 05:02 PM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>> - What we agreed on about versioning:
>> --> mingw-w64 should adopt a semi-rolling release model. It's
>> source only, so (Linux) packagers should just pick a (release) branch
>> and use its latest revision.
>
> it's
Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>> Heh, the solution is to use autotools, all the way, never
>> compromise on quality. There are a lot of packages too pretentious
>> to use autotools...
>
> Bull shit. Hardly a solution. Sorry for the direct words, but you
> can't possibly force autotools on the world. I ha
2011/8/9 Earnie :
> Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>
>>> Heh, the solution is to use autotools, all the way, never
>>> compromise on quality. There are a lot of packages too pretentious
>>> to use autotools...
>>
>> Bull shit. Hardly a solution. Sorry for the direct words, but you
>> can't possibly force a
> You guys rock, let that be clear ;-)
>
> Kai and me have been discussing a proper release build setup for
> mingw-w64. I would become the release packager dude that makes sure
> proper releases are... released.
>
> ...SNIP...
>
> Any constructive thoughts are welcome, and help in getting the
>
On 8/9/2011 22:19, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> 2011/8/9 Earnie :
>> Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>>
Heh, the solution is to use autotools, all the way, never
compromise on quality. There are a lot of packages too pretentious
to use autotools...
>>>
>>> Bull shit. Hardly a solution. Sorry for
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> --> binutils: latest trunk is the only sensible version
>
> does it means you always send all mingw/windows specific patches to
> binutils upstream and those are always merged? if not it'd be useful to
> keep all patches for the a given r
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Jon wrote:
>> You guys rock, let that be clear ;-)
>>
>> Kai and me have been discussing a proper release build setup for
>> mingw-w64. I would become the release packager dude that makes sure
>> proper releases are... released.
>>
>> ...SNIP...
>>
>> Any construct
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Jon wrote:
> >> You guys rock, let that be clear ;-)
> >>
> >> Kai and me have been discussing a proper release build setup for
> >> mingw-w64. I would become the release packager dude that makes sure
> >> proper releases are... released.
> >>
> >> ...SNIP...
> >
On 8/9/2011 23:49, Jon wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Jon wrote:
You guys rock, let that be clear ;-)
Kai and me have been discussing a proper release build setup for
mingw-w64. I would become the release packager dude that makes sure
proper releases are... rel
> On 8/9/2011 22:19, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > 2011/8/9 Earnie :
> >> Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> >>
> Heh, the solution is to use autotools, all the way, never
> compromise on quality. There are a lot of packages too pretentious
> to use autotools...
> >>>
> >>> Bull shit. Hardly a so
On 8/10/2011 01:12, Jon wrote:
>> On 8/9/2011 22:19, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>>> 2011/8/9 Earnie :
Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>> Heh, the solution is to use autotools, all the way, never
>> compromise on quality. There are a lot of packages too pretentious
>> to use autotools...
>>
11 matches
Mail list logo
