> > However, if you choose to use autotools, to better support the
> > build-for-windows-on-windows scenario I ask that you also maintain a
> > mingw32-make compatible Makefile. IIRC, this was Ozkan's suggestion near
> > the very beginning of the discussion.
>
> Do you mean by this "not msys" ?
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Jon wrote:
> However, if you choose to use autotools, to better support the
> build-for-windows-on-windows scenario I ask that you also maintain a
> mingw32-make compatible Makefile. IIRC, this was Ozkan's suggestion near the
> very beginning of the discussion.
> As for your concerns about CMake being available or not: it's
> available from all Linux and BSD variants I know because more and more
> projects are moving to CMake because more and more projects are
> concerned about cross-platform, including MSVC. It's not something
>
On 12/2/2012 06:27, Jon wrote:
As for your concerns about CMake being available or not: it's
available from all Linux and BSD variants I know because more and more
projects are moving to CMake because more and more projects are
concerned about cross-platform, including MSVC. It'
> >> As for your concerns about CMake being available or not: it's
> >> available from all Linux and BSD variants I know because more and more
> >> projects are moving to CMake because more and more projects are
> >> concerned about cross-platform, including MSVC. It's not something
> >> esoteric.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:49 AM, NightStrike wrote:
>>
>>
>> Really, I haven't seen any build system that I think is wonderful.
>> autotools works for us, but it's not great. I've used a lot... even
>> scons.
>
> just for curiosity : what do yo
2012/12/1 Ulf Magnusson :
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:33 PM, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> If I've understood things correctly, MinGW-w64 uses the SJLJ
>>> (longjmp-based) exceptions implementation for both win32 and win64,
>>> because D
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:33 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If I've understood things correctly, MinGW-w64 uses the SJLJ
>> (longjmp-based) exceptions implementation for both win32 and win64,
>> because DW2 (speedy, table-based) can't pas
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I've understood things correctly, MinGW-w64 uses the SJLJ
> (longjmp-based) exceptions implementation for both win32 and win64,
> because DW2 (speedy, table-based) can't pass exceptions through
> foreign stack frames (e.g., throwing
Hi,
If I've understood things correctly, MinGW-w64 uses the SJLJ
(longjmp-based) exceptions implementation for both win32 and win64,
because DW2 (speedy, table-based) can't pass exceptions through
foreign stack frames (e.g., throwing an exception from within a
callback and catching it at the point
>This is intriguing. Can you give some detail on how it works for
>cross compiling?
xml file definition regarding libraries and executables exists in
*.bkl files(similar to ant), bakefile will generate the makefiles from
*.bkl files for specific make tools.
It works perfectly in wxWidgets.
Rega
11 matches
Mail list logo