2013/6/5 dw :
>
>> When using latest mingw-w64 runtime from trunk for Cygwin I have
>> error: http://pastebin.com/9WVgE1Gu
>
> I would like to experiment with some alternate solutions to what ktietz
> proposed, but I need to be sure I understand what is going wrong.
>
> My attempts to reproduce the
Hi,
In our quest to enable winpthreads in Fedora we've stumbled across a new
issue. Libvirt fails to build with this linker error:
CCLD libvirt.la
./.libs/libvirt_driver_remote.a(libvirt_net_rpc_client_la-virnetclient.o): In
function `virNetClientIOEventLoop':
/builddir/build/BUILD/libvirt-0
---
mingw-w64-headers/Makefile.am | 2 +
mingw-w64-headers/Makefile.in | 2 +
mingw-w64-headers/include/activation.h| 132 ++
mingw-w64-headers/include/activation.idl | 16 +++
mingw-w64-headers/include/inspectable.h | 178 +++
Ok, I get it now. As everyone was trying to tell me (including myself),
the problem was in SIZE_T/size_t. I just couldn't get my head around
the fact that these two lines are different:
typedef unsigned long int size_t;
typedef unsigned long long SIZE_T;
Under CygWin64, they are both
HI,recently I tried several mingw and mingw-w64 version to build wx 2.9.4
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win32/Personal%20Builds/rubenvb
/gcc-4.8-release/i686-w64-mingw32-gcc-4.8.0-win32_rubenvb.7z/download
..failed mingw64+gcc4.8
http://www.drang
No, this patch isn't ok. The type size_t isn't adequate for
platform-headers. AFAI researched prototype in platform-header is
using SIZE_T.
The existing prototypes have to remain in winnt.h header. The
prototype of the inline-function has to match the signature of the
existing and valid prototyp
On 2013-6-6 14:01, zhangxinghai wrote:
> HI,recently I tried several mingw and mingw-w64 version to build wx 2.9.4
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win32/Personal%20Builds/rubenvb
> /gcc-4.8-release/i686-w64-mingw32-gcc-4.8.0-win32_rubenvb.7z/download
> .
> AFAI researched prototype in platform-header is using SIZE_T.
The question is, which header do you want to be consistent with? Even
files within the PSDK don't agree.
From the platform sdk winnt.h we see:
VOID
__stosb (
__out_ecount_full(Count) PBYTE Destination,
__in BYTE Value,
2013/6/6 dw :
>
>> AFAI researched prototype in platform-header is using SIZE_T.
> The question is, which header do you want to be consistent with? Even
> files within the PSDK don't agree.
>
> From the platform sdk winnt.h we see:
>
> VOID
> __stosb (
> __out_ecount_full(Count) PBYTE Destin
