This change makes sense. Right now Eric is checking this change on
Fedora. So we should wait for his results. This might be something
we would like to back-merge later to the 4.x branch.
Btw Martell, the fopen_s emulation-function would be something good
IMO. We should consider then emulation a
>
> This change makes sense. Right now Eric is checking this change on
> Fedora. So we should wait for his results.
>
Yes but I think he should also build on rc1 without the patch to make sure
that if there is a breakage this is the cause.
Btw Martell, the fopen_s emulation-function would be som
Martell Malone schreef op do 29-01-2015 om 15:23 [+]:
> This change makes sense. Right now Eric is checking this
> change on
> Fedora. So we should wait for his results.
> Yes but I think he should also build on rc1 without the patch to make
> sure that if there is a
This is a report for the 20150130 mass rebuild of all Fedora MinGW
packages against Fedora Rawhide and a list of all the changes which
have been applied since the previous mass rebuild.
During this mass rebuild the following toolchain was used:
* mingw-w64 v4.0rc1 with localtime_s/asctime_s patch
Erik van Pienbroek schreef op vr 30-01-2015 om 00:54 [+0100]:
> The following packages FAILED to rebuild:
>
> mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-10
> Package owner: greghellings
> Time to build: 2 minutes,
> Build logs:
> http://build1.vanpienbroek.nl/fedora-mingw-rebuild/20150130/mingw-cluc
Is this with the patch I posted to the mailing list ?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Erik van Pienbroek
wrote:
> Erik van Pienbroek schreef op vr 30-01-2015 om 00:54 [+0100]:
> > The following packages FAILED to rebuild:
> >
> > mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-10
> > Package owner: greghellings
>
Martell Malone schreef op vr 30-01-2015 om 00:32 [+]:
> Is this with the patch I posted to the mailing list ?
Correct
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and de
>
> Correct
Seems like the patch works as I intended :)
I will do a patch to turn them back to functions without inline and
hopefully this puts all the issues to rest :)
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Erik van Pienbroek
wrote:
> Martell Malone schreef op vr 30-01-2015 om 00:32 [+]:
>
>
