在 2023-04-03 13:19, Biswapriyo Nath 写道:
From 1e84335f246b5aeb1ca1ad29907f5918c52e3a7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Biswapriyo Nath
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 10:25:46 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] crt: Add mi import library
Required forhttps://github.com/cloudbase/PyMI.git
Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo
> That's exactly how it's supposed to work at least.
Thanks for the verification. I have removed the
mingw-w64-crt/lib32/mi.def and attached the updated patch file.
From 654aeb84c1138777a804ca236364fe4836d6ae12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Biswapriyo Nath
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 10:25:46 +0530
Su
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023, Biswapriyo Nath wrote:
If not, couldn't the lib32 variant also be omitted?
I am not sure about that. There is a rule `lib32/lib%.a:
lib-common/%.def` in mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.am. I am not certain that
the build system will grab the lib-common one when lib32 is absent.
Th
> If not, couldn't the lib32 variant also be omitted?
I am not sure about that. There is a rule `lib32/lib%.a:
lib-common/%.def` in mingw-w64-crt/Makefile.am. I am not certain that
the build system will grab the lib-common one when lib32 is absent.
___
(apologies for not including any quoted context, my mail client was not
cooperating with trying to quote an attachment)
Does the lib32/mi.def differ from the lib-common/mi.def? If not, couldn't
the lib32 variant also be omitted?
___
Mingw-w64-public
From 1e84335f246b5aeb1ca1ad29907f5918c52e3a7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Biswapriyo Nath
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 10:25:46 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] crt: Add mi import library
Required for https://github.com/cloudbase/PyMI.git
Signed-off-by: Biswapriyo Nath
---
mingw-w64-crt/{libarm32 => li
