t
do-able
>
>From: "m...@morous.org"
>To: mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
>Sent: Monday, August 8, 2011 5:31 AM
>Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] ANNOUNCEMENT: The version 2.0 of mingw-w64 is
>released!
>
>> I wro
>>
>> This is nice, but far from enough. There should be clear policy who from
>> the team is responsible for release management, how often (approx.) you
>> plan to release (e.g. 2 times a year or every month), if there is any
>> public RC (and for how long before the planned final release), so
>>
On 08/08/2011 02:56 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> On 08/08/2011 12:49 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> I agree that we need to setup a fixed way how releases need to be
>>> done. I think a time-based schedule for this could be a good
>>> approach. As i
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 08/08/2011 12:49 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> I agree that we need to setup a fixed way how releases need to be
>> done. I think a time-based schedule for this could be a good
>> approach. As in general our runtime isn't necessarly strict bou
2011/8/8 :
>> I wrote up some base information on our Wiki to describe things in
>> more detail. Especially the download-section looks on the first
>> glance a bit weird,
>>
>> Please read in our Wiki
>> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mingw-w64/wiki/Structure%20on%20SF%20download%20page
>> for
2011/8/8 :
>> I wrote up some base information on our Wiki to describe things in
>> more detail. Especially the download-section looks on the first
>> glance a bit weird,
>>
>> Please read in our Wiki
>> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mingw-w64/wiki/Structure%20on%20SF%20download%20page
>> for
> I wrote up some base information on our Wiki to describe things in
> more detail. Especially the download-section looks on the first
> glance a bit weird,
>
> Please read in our Wiki
> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mingw-w64/wiki/Structure%20on%20SF%20download%20page
> for some more details
On 08/08/2011 12:49 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> I agree that we need to setup a fixed way how releases need to be
> done. I think a time-based schedule for this could be a good
> approach. As in general our runtime isn't necessarly strict bound to
> a specific gcc or binutils version. Most dependenci
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> and some kind of wiki which describe the recommended binutils and gcc
> and other toolchains. it's also missing.
There are a number of wiki pages, such as:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/mingw-w64/wiki/download%20filename%20structure
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> Perhaps a release-buildbot should fire up an "official release" every
> two weeks, be tested quickly before upload, and put in a nice seperate
> "releases" directory. Somewhat a Personal Build, but automated. This
> would take some time and
2011/8/8 :
> Hi all,
>
> although I appreciate the hard work on the mingw-w64 project, I must agree
> here with the voices calling for more transparent release policies. Now
> it's really a pain.
>
> I think mingw-w64 forum and mailing lists already presented a frustration
> of community about thi
Hi all,
although I appreciate the hard work on the mingw-w64 project, I must agree
here with the voices calling for more transparent release policies. Now
it's really a pain.
I think mingw-w64 forum and mailing lists already presented a frustration
of community about this.
Consider for example t
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
wrote:
> 2011/8/8 Vincent Torri :
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Farkas Levente
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08/08/2011 09:01 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> >> > 2011/8/7 Farkas Levente :
> >> >> On 08/07/2011 09:40 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> >> >>> Hell
2011/8/8 Vincent Torri :
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>
>> On 08/08/2011 09:01 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> > 2011/8/7 Farkas Levente :
>> >> On 08/07/2011 09:40 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> >>> Hello everybody,
>> >>>
>> >>> We proudly announce that we released the new versi
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 08/08/2011 09:01 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> > 2011/8/7 Farkas Levente :
> >> On 08/07/2011 09:40 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> >>> Hello everybody,
> >>>
> >>> We proudly announce that we released the new version 2.0 of the
> >>> mingw-w64 runtime a
On 08/08/2011 09:01 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2011/8/7 Farkas Levente :
>> On 08/07/2011 09:40 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> Hello everybody,
>>>
>>> We proudly announce that we released the new version 2.0 of the
>>> mingw-w64 runtime and header-set today.
>>> We have to thank many people for contribution
2011/8/7 Farkas Levente :
> On 08/07/2011 09:40 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> We proudly announce that we released the new version 2.0 of the
>> mingw-w64 runtime and header-set today.
>> We have to thank many people for contributions to mingw-w64 that
>> made this new release to h
On 08/07/2011 09:40 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> We proudly announce that we released the new version 2.0 of the
> mingw-w64 runtime and header-set today.
> We have to thank many people for contributions to mingw-w64 that
> made this new release to happen.
>
> The version 2.0-rc1 r
2011/8/7 Ozkan Sezer :
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> We proudly announce that we released the new version 2.0 of the
>> mingw-w64 runtime and header-set today.
>> We have to thank many people for contributions to mingw-w64 that
>> made this new relea
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> We proudly announce that we released the new version 2.0 of the
> mingw-w64 runtime and header-set today.
> We have to thank many people for contributions to mingw-w64 that
> made this new release to happen.
>
> The version 2
Hello everybody,
We proudly announce that we released the new version 2.0 of the
mingw-w64 runtime and header-set today.
We have to thank many people for contributions to mingw-w64 that
made this new release to happen.
The version 2.0-rc1 release can be found in the svn-repository
under "/tags/v2
21 matches
Mail list logo
