On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
yes, this size different - *especially* for *small* apps - is to be
expected. As exactly for those *small* applications differences in
hey,
While checking --as-needed on Windows (which, btw, seems useless as
the win32 linker seems smarter than the linux one), i've looked at the
size of binaries produced by mingw.org (hence 32 bits) and mingw-w64
64 bits. The code:
#include stdio.h
int main()
{
printf(test\n);
return 0;
}
Hello,
yes, this size different - *especially* for *small* apps - is to be
expected. As exactly for those *small* applications differences in
startup-code are shown more significant. Additionally it is
absolutely unprofessional to compare 32-bit exectuable vs 64-bit one.
The latter has
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
yes, this size different - *especially* for *small* apps - is to be
expected. As exactly for those *small* applications differences in
startup-code are shown more significant. Additionally it is
absolutely
