Re: [MirageOS-devel] Hardware choices for ARM64

2015-11-11 Thread Vincent Bernardoff
On 09/11/2015 15:21, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > Just fyi, I also got another off-list reply pointing to: > >> The gigabyte MP30-AR0 boards are nice and very affordable: >> >> http://b2b.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5422#ov >> >> includes the X-gene 1 processor. They cost around $700

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Testing the next release of mirage

2015-11-11 Thread Drup
@mindy, jeremy, gareth: Sweet, don't hesitate to ask questions ! For the json export, that should be quite easy, all those informations are already gathered in two data structures ("Info.t" and the graph). You won't be able to export what you call the "pattern" easily though, because the pars

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Testing the next release of mirage

2015-11-11 Thread Matthew Gray
Just wanted to give a general thumbs up for Functoria, I added another module to mirage-types and it was a really simple experience to get it into the code generation. On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Thomas Gazagnaire wrote: > Hi all, > > We are preparing the next release of the mirage tool, wh

Re: [MirageOS-devel] MirageOS fortnightly call - Wednesday 11th at 4pm GMT

2015-11-11 Thread Amir Chaudhry
The link for the call is: https://meet.jit.si/MirageOS > On 10 Nov 2015, at 22:18, Amir Chaudhry wrote: > > Hi folks, > > The next MirageOS call will take place on Wednesday afternoon at 4pm GMT and > is open to all. > > We'll continue using Jitsi [1] and I’ll post the link shortly before the

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Irmin on BLOCK

2015-11-11 Thread Nik Sultana
Coincidentally B-trees came up recently on Ocaml-list: https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list/2015-11/msg00011.html On 2015-11-11 09:58, Rupert Horlick wrote: Hmm, it seems like that is built on top of a few packages that don't exist any more to interface between Baardskeerder and Mirage.

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Irmin on BLOCK

2015-11-11 Thread David Scott
Since it's for a project, take all of this with a pinch of salt: (random thoughts follow) A simple b-tree on disk would probably be much like an in-heap b-tree, except the nodes would be naturally wider and you would also need to track and reclaim free blocks (which the GC would normally do for yo

Re: [MirageOS-devel] OPAM for ubuntu 15.10

2015-11-11 Thread Anil Madhavapeddy
Hi Luis, It shoud all be synced with the ppa:avsm/ppa stable repository now, and I've tested it in a Docker container to make sure the repo is consistent. Thanks for the reminder -- I hadn't done this until you sent me the email. cheers, Anil > On 11 Nov 2015, at 00:09, Luis A. wrote: > > Hi

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Deployment scripts / hack

2015-11-11 Thread Richard Mortier
PRs sent. Probably useful to double-check I didn't get over-enthusiastic... :) I left the `config.ml` files in place so that the `xen/` subdirs remain to make it easy to recover any specific unikernel. On 11 November 2015 at 02:11, Richard Mortier wrote: > Will do unless someone beats me to the

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Irmin on BLOCK

2015-11-11 Thread Rupert Horlick
Hmm, it seems like that is built on top of a few packages that don't exist any more to interface between Baardskeerder and Mirage. Do you think it's worth doing a simple B-Tree implementation myself, or would it be better to try and build a new interface module for Mirage and Baardskeerder? A B-T

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Testing the next release of mirage

2015-11-11 Thread Gareth Rushgrove
On 11 November 2015 at 01:55, Thomas Gazagnaire wrote: >> 2. I'd love to be able to get at the configuration options as data, in >> an ideal world JSON, probably something like a generated JSON schema >> (http://json-schema.org/) >> >> My rationale for the last part is integration with other tools