Hi,
Does anyone know if MD5 authentication in ospfd is known to be broken? In
our test environment things work fine without authentication or simple
authentication turned on, but as soon as we turn on MD5 authentication
things break.
We're using the snapshot of October 13th and a Cisco 3640
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 02:15:24PM +0700, Egbert Krook wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if MD5 authentication in ospfd is known to be broken? In
our test environment things work fine without authentication or simple
authentication turned on, but as soon as we turn on MD5 authentication
things
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:33:52AM +0159, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 02:15:24PM +0700, Egbert Krook wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if MD5 authentication in ospfd is known to be broken? In
our test environment things work fine without authentication or simple
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:16:10AM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
thanks all. there's some newer code in cvs now..
It still hangs for me when changing hw.setperf
--
Frank - my stupid blog: http://00f.net
L'annuaire des professionnels de la manucure et de la pedicure :
http://www.manucure-pro.com
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:04:42 +1300, Stephen Nelson wrote:
I have found a PR4570 which seems to be a similar problem.
Interestingly, this was with an nForce4 chipset, whereas my chipset is
Intel.
There was a post 'Problem instaling OpenBSD on IBM xSeries 336' a few days
back. AFAIR, with a
hi there,
i am using a snapshot from
OpenBSD 3.8-current (GENERIC) #196: Mon Oct 17 14:32:07 MDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
and setxkbmap is dumping core:
amaaq setxkbmap
Couldn't interpret _XKB_RULES_NAMES property
Use defaults: rules - 'xorg' model -
Ahoj!
there is a diff from gordon klok in the snapshots that should improve
support for k7 and k8 family powernow (cool and quiet). i'd like to
know where/if it works, what messages get printed, and if hw.setperf
does anything useful. md5 -t with setperf=0 and 100 would be nice.
I am still
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:35:07PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
hi there,
i am using a snapshot from
OpenBSD 3.8-current (GENERIC) #196: Mon Oct 17 14:32:07 MDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
and setxkbmap is dumping core:
amaaq setxkbmap
Couldn't
Hello,
I got my 3.8 set in the mail yesterday, and went to my new laptop to
install it, but...
The installer hangs right after detecting fdc0. Complete lock, I
can't even get caps-lock to light itself.
I tried boot -c and disabling fdc0, then the installer hung after pccom0.
What is the
On 10/28/05, Jared Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the installer detecting post fdc0 that I can disable to allow
it to boot and install (and then I can post a dmesg!)
Perhaps booting with a verbose output provides you with more
information on the culprit.
boot -c
UKC verbose
Also,
On Friday 28 October 2005 09:15, Egbert Krook wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know if MD5 authentication in ospfd is known to be broken? In
our test environment things work fine without authentication or simple
authentication turned on, but as soon as we turn on MD5 authentication
things break.
I don't know this would affect you as well using OSPFd as it obviously
did me on BGPd, but I would suspect that it would. Not sure why it
wouldn't really. The problem is/was in tcp-input.c and that's on the TCP
stack use for both the BGPd and OSPFd obviously.
OSPF does not use tcp.
--
I made the following changes and recompiled. It
looks like the card is now recognized, but they array
(and disks) are not. I am attaching my dmesg output
from the two changes that I made:
pcidevs:
product SYMBIOS 1068 0x0054 1068
mpt_pci.c:
{ PCI_VENDOR_SYMBIOS,
Hello!
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 09:12:34AM -0400, Frank Bax wrote:
spamd only delays the *first* message between the two parties. After that
there is no delay - as long as sender continues to use the same SMTP server.
And there's no mailout pool with shared queue involved, and if the
envelope
Just replying to my own mail to get my findings into the misc@
archives. Perhaps it'll save someone else some time since I've
found partial solutions to my problems.
Thanks to Jonathan Gray for his help and pointers -- I wouldn't
be able to figure all this out otherwise.
First of all, the Dell
From: Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And there's no mailout pool with shared queue involved, and if the
envelope sender address is always the same (i.e. no VERP, no SES,
no self-signed SRS, no SRS-enabled forwards, etc.).
Surprisingly few.
problem? During the initial weeks of using
We don't have the hardware readily available to develop the driver. Anyone
interested in donating some SAS gear in .au, .ca or .us?
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:18:10AM -0700, Mike Keller wrote:
I made the following changes and recompiled. It
looks like the card is now recognized, but they
Roger, thanks for the tip, enabling verbose helped me fix it.
However, now my wireless card (Cisco Aironet 350) is telling me it's
unconfigured... so still no dmesg as I have no network here. Do I
just need to compile GENERIC with Aironet in it?
Regards,
-j
On 10/28/05, Rogier Krieger [EMAIL
On 10/28/05, Jared Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger, thanks for the tip, enabling verbose helped me fix it.
It has come through for me on several occasions when some hardware
component was messing things up. Typically, I check with another BSD
flavour or a Knoppix CD in case of problems at
Hi there,
We are running a set of three systems for semiconductor technology, and
would like to finalize our work in getting them to interoperate properly,
but have run into some issues that touch on the very fabric of TCP/IP
expertise, but iptables has already been used to solve part of this,
At 02:22 PM 10/28/05, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 09:12:34AM -0400, Frank Bax wrote:
During the initial weeks of using spamd on my server, half of the
complaints about undelivered email were not the fault of spamd.
So the other half *was* the fault of spamd?
Sorry, spamd
21 matches
Mail list logo
