asw3nvjwbdddf employees involved

A number of employees & officers at asw3nvjwbdddf provided support. Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping

LKM's broken on Arm/Zaurus on -current?

Been trying to get a lkm compiled on Zaurus on -current However the following errors appear when compiling with gcc -Wall -D_KERNEL -I/sys -c wafter.c --errors--- In file included from /usr/include/arm/cpu.h:89, from /usr/include/machine/cpu.h:4,

Re: Nokia IP330 OpenBSD 3.8 Information and Installation Assistance

Would it be possible to modify the following values in /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf/GENERIC to match that of FreeBSD's GENERIC.hints, then recompile? The biggest challenge is the lack of debugging/diagnostic information or a way to get to it. >From OpenBSD - #option "KGDB_DEVNAME=\"pcc

Re: browser security

Hi, James Strandboge wrote: On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 03:02 +0100, Andreas Bartelt wrote: ... Apache forks children with reduced priviledges (user www) while, at the same time, there's always an Apache process running as root. Therefore, a useful systrace policy for Apache probably won't be easy

Re: browser security

On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 03:02 +0100, Andreas Bartelt wrote: > Hi, > > James Strandboge wrote: > ... > >>While we're at systrace, I was wondering - could systrace reduce the risks > >>associated with running apache with PHP? > > > > > > Default apache is already chrooted, so systracing it won't be

Re: Help w/ install image on compactflash(cdrom38.fs or floppy38.fs)

kyle wrote: > Hi all, > > Im running into a (silly) problem where I am seem not to be writing the boot > install images properly to a compact flash card. Ive been trying > cdrom38.fsand > floppy38.fs. I write the image under linux to the compact flash(seen as hde > device) as so: > > cat floppy38

Re: Daily script and root backup question.

Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: > Hi, > > Looking at /etc/daily I can see that backup is done by dd(1) command: > > echo "Backing up root filesystem:" > echo "copying /dev/r$rootdev to /dev/r$rootbak" > dd if=/dev/r$rootdev of=/dev/r$rootbak bs=16b seek=1 skip=1 \ > conv=

Re: Nokia IP330 OpenBSD 3.8 Information and Installation Assistance

Here is an original Checkpoint FW-1 (IPSO 3.7 I believe) dmesg: Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Resizing packet buffers: mbufs 15360 clusters 14000 releng 1217 10.15.2003-024500 CPU: 399-MHz K6-2 (586-class CPU)

hostap mode on existing firewall

New project I'm trying to work out since the last was a flame-out. Trying to get my firewall to double as a secured access point so I can actually carry my laptop around. I've got a working card: ral0 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 "Ralink RT2560" rev 0x01: irq 12, address 00:11:50:14:f6:a0 ral0: MAC

Re: browser security

Hi, James Strandboge wrote: ... While we're at systrace, I was wondering - could systrace reduce the risks associated with running apache with PHP? Default apache is already chrooted, so systracing it won't be as much of a win as systracing processes not in a chroot. That said, you can defin

Weird colour Daemon Wireframe T-shirts temporarily available

We had some test prints of Wireframe Daemon T-shirts made a few years ago using some weird colours. They may as well find a home, so I have added a few of them temporarily to the order site -- look for extra colours under the Daemon Wireframe colour selector. These are mostly only in XXL or as

Re: ettercap

That's what I did: Terminal type? [xterm] vt220 # cd /usr/ports/net/ettercap/ # cvs -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs up -r1.14'patches/patch-configure ' # ls CVS distinfo pkg Makefile patches w-ettercap-0.6.b # vi Makefile #(_bump_w-ettercap-0.6.b) # $OpenBSD: Makef

Re: browser security

On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 23:38 +0100, viq wrote: > On Wednesday 14 December 2005 23:15, James Strandboge wrote: > > > systrace could provide an effective jail for firefox. 'man systrace'. > > Yes, it was mentioned, and it sounds like a good idea. > > While we're at systrace, I was wondering - coul

Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

On Wednesday 14 December 2005 17:35, Jack Woehr wrote: > Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client (if one > exists) other than Mozilla? > > Years ago I hopped directly from Elm on a host server to graphic mail > clients on my desktop > box without ever dealing with, e.g., mutt

Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

On 12/14/05, Jack Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client (if one > exists) other than Mozilla? > > Years ago I hopped directly from Elm on a host server to graphic mail > clients on my desktop > box without ever dealing with, e.g., mutt & se

Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

Simon Morgan wrote: I recommend Sylpheed Claws. BTW I hope you filed a bug report for that crash. :) Bugzilla for Mozilla says "don't bother for releases over two weeks old". -- Jack J. Woehr # "I never played fast and loose with the PO Box 51, Golden, CO 80402 # Constit

Re: Nokia IP330 OpenBSD 3.8 Information and Installation Assistance

On 12/13/05, NetNeanderthal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FreeBSD 6.0 dmesg > ---8<--- > Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD 6.0-R

Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

On 14/12/05, Chris Cappuccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mutt works with imap based folders > you just type in an imap url instead of a folder name when you hit C I was thinking more of POP3.

Re: browser security

On Wednesday 14 December 2005 23:15, James Strandboge wrote: > systrace could provide an effective jail for firefox. 'man systrace'. Yes, it was mentioned, and it sounds like a good idea. While we're at systrace, I was wondering - could systrace reduce the risks associated with running apache

What is Home Buyer CD and how it can help you

[IMAGE]Thank you for your interest in our Home Buyer CD's. Below are some screen shots from the actual program. Your name and contact information appear on the physical CD's as well as through out the program, and even on anything the user prints. The link that appears on the bottom of the screen

Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

Simon Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Correct me if I'm wrong but don't you still need to use something like > fetchmail to download your mail, and doesn't that rely on an MTA of > some sort? > mutt works with imap based folders you just type in an imap url instead of a folder name when you

Re: browser security

On 14/12/05, Fletch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't this a mute point. I mean, unless you are surfing the web as > root, any remote browser exploit would only effect the user and a logoff > and login again would sort out *most* problems associated with remote > exploits. Once a remote attacker

Re: browser security

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:50:53AM -0500, Will H. Backman wrote: > > Anyone dare try making a systrace policy for firefox? > and where's difficulty in writting such policy? It's 20'' of work: use ``wizard'' or automatic policy generation, and then clean up the ruleset looking through syscalls and

Re: GNOME PANEL unexpectedly quits

On 14/12/05, Simon Slaytor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyones else have this issue and if so is there a workaround? Yeah, use a different GUI. If you must insist on use buggy pieces of crap like GNOME then your only real option is to file a bug. If you're lucky and they don't ignore you it

Re: browser security

Bob Smith wrote: > vmware recently released a program which kind of > chroot jails the browser. > http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/vm/browserapp.html > > im not a programmer myself, but i was wondering > if perhaps using a similar technique we could lock > down the browsers in openbsd? > > seems to me

Re: browser security

On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 21:58 +0100, viq wrote: > On Wednesday 14 December 2005 19:48, Bob Smith wrote: > > > Just a thought: sudo -u $some_restricted_user $your_preffered_browser ? > > > > good that you brought this up; i been wondering about this too. > > > > does it help? if so how come there isn

Re: Help w/ install image on compactflash(cdrom38.fs or floppy38.fs)

--On 14 December 2005 15:55 -0500, kyle wrote: Im running into a (silly) problem where I am seem not to be writing the boot install images properly to a compact flash card. Ive been trying cdrom38.fs and floppy38.fs. Can you install the OS (not just the installer) onto the CF on another box,

Please sign in your USAA account, verify and update your profile immediately

USAA Member Home [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Dear USAA. member, Our policy is to protect personal or financial information of USAA members. It has come to our attention that your account information needs to be updated due to inactive members, frauds and spoof reports. If you could please take 5-

GNOME PANEL unexpectedly quits

Hi Folks, I've Googled until I'm blue in the face and checked the bug reporting system and cannot find an answer to my problem. I have just completed two 3.8 release installs on two different hardware platforms, both i386 but one a Celeron D / 75xx chipset box (Gigabyte SR147S server chassis

Re: pf rule

Alexander Hall wrote: You should propably use somthing like: block all pass out proto tcp from any to 10.0.0.1 port ssh Forgot to keep state; modulate state could be useful too: pass out proto tcp from any to 10.0.0.1 port ssh keep state /Alexander

Re: pf rule

raff wrote: Hello. i have 1 rule in my pf.conf, with wich i want to allow locally generated traffic ONLY to 10.0.0.1 and port 22: block out on $int_if proto {tcp,udp} from $int_ip to ! 10.0.0.1 \ port != 22 this rule allow to connect to only 10.0.0.1, BUT to any port instead only 22. A

Re: browser security

On Wednesday 14 December 2005 19:48, Bob Smith wrote: > > Just a thought: sudo -u $some_restricted_user $your_preffered_browser ? > > good that you brought this up; i been wondering about this too. > > does it help? if so how come there isnt a default non-privileged user > created for, say, firefo

Help w/ install image on compactflash(cdrom38.fs or floppy38.fs)

Hi all, Im running into a (silly) problem where I am seem not to be writing the boot install images properly to a compact flash card. Ive been trying cdrom38.fsand floppy38.fs. I write the image under linux to the compact flash(seen as hde device) as so: cat floppy38.fs > /dev/hde or: dd if=flo

Re: browser security

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Simon Morgan > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 2:32 PM > To: J.C. Roberts > Cc: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: browser security > > On 14/12/05, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When you

Re: browser security

On 14/12/05, J. C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:32:18 +, Simon Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >I've just had the most awesome idea: chroot the entire operating system! > > It seems your mother never warned you that such levels of sarcasm > usually results i

Re: browser security

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:32:18 +, Simon Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 14/12/05, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> When you think about all the crap a graphical browser needs just to run >> (fonts, mime types, library dependencies, plugins, cache, user >> preferences, ...), it wi

Re: browser security

On 14/12/05, J.C. Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When you think about all the crap a graphical browser needs just to run > (fonts, mime types, library dependencies, plugins, cache, user > preferences, ...), it will probably be a major pain to chroot the beast > because you'll be duplicating t

Re: Source Based Routing

--On 14 December 2005 11:57 -0600, Cody Holland wrote: I've got a server that needs to be on 2 separate networks with 2 different gateways. How would I go about setting up source based routing? See and pf.conf(5).

Re: routing question

Good day, I have seen similar problems before. You must be doing some sort of proxying or NAT to allow Internet sites to communicate with hosts on the 192.168.10/24 subnet, right? So the site on the Internet has to have a path back to a NAT'ed or Proxied service through the 192.168.10/24 subnet i

Re: browser security

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:37:16 -0800, Bob Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >thanks for the explanation. > >so it would be less work to try to chroot a browser then to make a >virtual machine? perhaps its even a better way of isolating? > >i googled around a bit and found some threads about people tr

Re: browser security - restricted user

> Just a thought: sudo -u $some_restricted_user $your_preffered_browser ? good that you brought this up; i been wondering about this too. does it help? if so how come there isnt a default non-privileged user created for, say, firefox when the pkg is installed? like there is for bitlbee (_bitlbee

Source Based Routing

I've got a server that needs to be on 2 separate networks with 2 different gateways. How would I go about setting up source based routing? Cody

Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

--On 14 December 2005 17:36 +, Simon Morgan wrote: On 14/12/05, Simon Dassow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:35:36AM -0700, Jack Woehr wrote: > Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client (if > one exists) other than Mozilla? mutt+msmtp: sucks less a

Re: Just confirming: no way to do a pf rdr based on hostname?

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Jens Teglhus >Mxller >Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 5:16 PM >To: misc@openbsd.org >Subject: Re: Just confirming: no way to do a pf rdr based on hostname? > >Peter Landry wrote: >> Hi All, >> We're migra

Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

try sylpheed (does exist as precompiled pkgs) /bkw On 14/12/05, Jack Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client (if one > exists) other than Mozilla? > > Years ago I hopped directly from Elm on a host server to graphic mail > clients on my deskt

routing question

Greets I have a scenario that is simple but I am having trouble getting my head around. Inside a 192.168.10/24 network there exists a 10.4.6/24 network for VOIP. Everthing works fine. The issue I have is setting up a route for a third party VOIP management company who wants to access the VOI

Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

On 14/12/05, Simon Dassow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:35:36AM -0700, Jack Woehr wrote: > > Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client (if one > > exists) other than Mozilla? > > mutt+msmtp: sucks less and avoids sendmail usage ;-) Correct me if I'm wr

Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

I use mutt to access my email server via imaps and use msmtp for outbound via TLS w/SMTP AUTH. http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.11 Dload the msmtp-1.4.1.tgz package from your closest mirror in packages -- Allie Daneman Allnix,LLC. http://www.allnix.net On Wed, December 14, 2005

Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

On 12/14/05, Jack Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm just hoping to get around this > without weeks of learning how > to configure sendmail for mutt ... I think nbSMTP ("no-brainer SMTP") would be perfect for you. You can find it on http://nbsmtp.ferdyx.org/ Download, compile, edit a simple

Re: Trying to understand iostat output

Joachim Schipper wrote: > There was a lengthy thread about ccd mirroring here. Search the > archives, and check whether it's worth the risk of ccd 'eating your > data' first. (If not, go with RAID-1.) Hi Yes, I followed the thread, but to my understanding it was not conclusive that ccd would be

Re: Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:35:36AM -0700, Jack Woehr wrote: > Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client (if one > exists) other than Mozilla? mutt+msmtp: sucks less and avoids sendmail usage ;-) Kind regards Simon

Re: browser security

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:58:50 +, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You may also want to realize that no attempted isolation is perfect. >> There are ways for attackers to break out of jails/chroots and similar >> is true for virtual machines. By using such methods you've only added

Re: browser security

On Wednesday 14 December 2005 17:37, Bob Smith wrote: > thanks for the explanation. > > so it would be less work to try to chroot a browser then to make a > virtual machine? perhaps its even a better way of isolating? > > i googled around a bit and found some threads about people trying to > chroot

Re: browser security

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Bob Smith > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:37 AM > To: J. C. Roberts > Cc: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: browser security > > thanks for the explanation. > > so it would be less work to try to

Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client?

Recommendations for another POP3/IMAP/SMTP mail reader client (if one exists) other than Mozilla? Years ago I hopped directly from Elm on a host server to graphic mail clients on my desktop box without ever dealing with, e.g., mutt & setting up sendmail. Now Mozilla 1.7.2 crashes hard on recei

Re: browser security

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 05:41:30AM -0800, Bob Smith wrote: > vmware recently released a program which kind of > chroot jails the browser. > http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/vm/browserapp.html > > im not a programmer myself, but i was wondering > if perhaps using a similar technique we could lock > down

Re: browser security

thanks for the explanation. so it would be less work to try to chroot a browser then to make a virtual machine? perhaps its even a better way of isolating? i googled around a bit and found some threads about people trying to chroot their browsers, but i couldnt find any successful story. is it pr

Re: browser security

--On 14 December 2005 05:41 -0800, Bob Smith wrote: vmware recently released a program which kind of chroot jails the browser. Actually, they released a disk-image with an installation of Ubuntu Linux including Firefox, that runs in their free-of-charge 'player' for x86 Linux/Windows (basic

Re: browser security

--On 14 December 2005 06:38 -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote: Even VMware supports only one architecture for their "player" (x86-32) They do actually support x86-64 on the player (I'm not sure if this changed recently - 'player' is out of beta as of a day or two ago). and only two possible host o

Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc

Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote: Thanks everyone for trying to help. I think that I will simply have to wait until the right driver becomes available one day. Either that or use a different phone and try again. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Marius Van Deventer - Um

Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc

> -Original Message- > From: Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu > Sent: 14 December 2005 04:39 PM > To: 'Stuart Henderson'; misc@openbsd.org > Subject: RE: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Stuart Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc

> -Original Message- > From: Stuart Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 December 2005 04:16 PM > To: Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu; misc@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc > > > --On 14 December 2005 15:30 +0200, Marius Van Deventer - Umzi

Re: browser security

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 05:41:30 -0800, Bob Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >vmware recently released a program which kind of >chroot jails the browser. >http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/vm/browserapp.html > >im not a programmer myself, but i was wondering >if perhaps using a similar technique we could loc

Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc

--On 14 December 2005 15:30 +0200, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote: A lot of people have done this it seems, but with serial cables, not USB. A lot of USB cables for phones (especially third-party ones) include standard USB-serial adapters attaching to ucom(4), often using a Prolific

Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc

Thanks everyone for trying to help. I think that I will simply have to wait until the right driver becomes available one day. Either that or use a different phone and try again. Thanks again. > -Original Message- > From: Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu > Sent: 14 December 2005 03:31 PM

Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 03:30:51PM +0200, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Joachim Schipper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 14 December 2005 02:30 PM > > To: misc@openbsd.org > > Subject: Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc > > > > >

browser security

vmware recently released a program which kind of chroot jails the browser. http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/vm/browserapp.html im not a programmer myself, but i was wondering if perhaps using a similar technique we could lock down the browsers in openbsd? seems to me that would increase security greatl

Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc

> -Original Message- > From: Joachim Schipper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 December 2005 02:30 PM > To: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 02:07:13PM +0200, Marius Van Deventer > - Umzimkulu wrote: > > Just a

Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc

> -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 December 2005 02:14 PM > To: Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu > Cc: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:54:19PM +0200, Marius Van Devent

Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 02:07:13PM +0200, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote: > Just after I sent this mail, I did another search. Guess what I found? > > Anyways guys, disregard my question for now. > > Thanks. Nah, my guess failed. Could you post your solution, or, if it is already in the a

Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:54:19PM +0200, Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu wrote: > HI All > > I did a google search and found a little info, but nothing concise. > Maybe I used the wrong parameters, I dunno... > > Anyway, my question. > > Have any of you had any success connecting a mobile phone

Re: Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc

Just after I sent this mail, I did another search. Guess what I found? Anyways guys, disregard my question for now. Thanks. > -Original Message- > From: Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu > Sent: 14 December 2005 01:54 PM > To: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: Connecting Nokia (and other) phone

Connecting Nokia (and other) phones to a pc

HI All I did a google search and found a little info, but nothing concise. Maybe I used the wrong parameters, I dunno... Anyway, my question. Have any of you had any success connecting a mobile phone to openbsd, using it as both a storage device and a gprs/3G modem? >From what I could gather, I

Daily script and root backup question.

Hi, Looking at /etc/daily I can see that backup is done by dd(1) command: echo "Backing up root filesystem:" echo "copying /dev/r$rootdev to /dev/r$rootbak" dd if=/dev/r$rootdev of=/dev/r$rootbak bs=16b seek=1 skip=1 \ conv=noerror fsck -y /dev/r$ro

Re: pf rule

On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 08:57:58AM +0100, raff wrote: > Hello. > > i have 1 rule in my pf.conf, with wich i want to allow locally generated > traffic ONLY to 10.0.0.1 and port 22: > > block out on $int_if proto {tcp,udp} from $int_ip to ! 10.0.0.1 \ > port != 22 > > this rule allow to conn

Nokia IP330 OpenBSD 3.8 Information and Installation Assistance

Hi misc@, Background I am yet another Nokia IP330 owner seeking help to put a real OS/Firewall onto one of these devices. I have a handful of these at my disposal, all with AMD K6-2 400MHz CPUs, 1 SDRAM bank with 256MB of CAS2 PC100 ECC SDRAM (the other is empty), 2xdc NICs, 3xfxp NICs, Primary I