Cool! That seems to have done the trick (April 20, 2006 snapshot):
(I)nstall, (U)pgrade, or (S)hell? s
# fsck -b32 -f /dev/rwd0d
Alternate Superblock Location: 32
** /dev/rwd0d
** File system is already clean
** Last mounted on
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
**
Hi,
Note that the PCI slot is 3.3V only, most WiFI PCI cards i have looked at are
5V. My guess is that you have to go with MiniPCI (but i might be wrong).
Cheers,
/Joakim
* Lasse Bach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
I wrote a message about OpenBSD hardware recommendations some time
Hi,
I'm planning to do the same.
The NET4801 has an USB 1.1 interface. I use it at home and I don't have a lot
of traffic on wifi, so I thought I would try using the
Zonet ZEW2500P USB Adapter.
See: http://www.zonetusa.com/DispProduct.asp?ProductID=139
and
Here: http://www.openbsdmetastore.com/
Try OpenVPN - client software isn't native for win xp but exists and it's
stable and usable..
http://openvpn.net
http://openvpn.se
Marek
2006/4/19, wolk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello
I want to create simply vpn server with native windows xp vpn client. What
is the simply way to create this
Ashley Moran wrote:
simplicity) is Pound. From what I read, failover is best provided by
Heartbeat although so far I have only skimmed a few FAQs.
I use 'heartbeast' for several years now and would not do so again.
Failover always takes several seconds because of ARP change propagation.
Do
Hi,
thank you all, it seems to work now.
just for the records, my configuration:
master carp interfaces are configured like this:
vhid 1 pass foo carpdev vlan3 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.255 netmask
255.255.255.0 up
and the backup interfaces are configured like this:
vhid 1 pass foo carpdev vlan3
On 21/04/06, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 19.04.2006 at 12:57:16 +0100, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 19/04/06, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, if someone of you comes across good E3 cards, please drop me a
note. Otherwise, try to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That doesn`t mean I can use *.google.com but I would be able to use
www.google.com if I understood the FAQ and the manual correctly.
Because I may not be bale to know every Hostname in a foreign network a
Joker would be a neat solution.
Is it maybe planed to add any
On Friday 21 April 2006 17:52, Falk Husemann wrote:
Why isn't it feasible to use Googles allocated netblock (216.239.32.0/19)?
Because there's nothing that says that every *.google.com site has to be
within a block allocated to Google.
---
Lars Hansson
Lars Hansson wrote:
Why isn't it feasible to use Googles allocated netblock (216.239.32.0/19)?
Because there's nothing that says that every *.google.com site has to be
within a block allocated to Google.
Duh. The obvious solution is to have pf make a DNS lookup on each and
every packet
On 21/04/06, Moritz Grimm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lars Hansson wrote:
Why isn't it feasible to use Googles allocated netblock (216.239.32.0/19
)?
Because there's nothing that says that every *.google.com site has to be
within a block allocated to Google.
Duh. The obvious solution is
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:46:14 +0200, Joakim Aronius wrote:
Hi,
Note that the PCI slot is 3.3V only, most WiFI PCI cards i have looked at are
5V. My guess is that you have to go with MiniPCI (but i might be wrong).
Cheers,
/Joakim
Nup!
MSI PC54G2 is ral
Netgear WAG311 is atheros AR5212
both
On Thursday 20 April 2006 19:26, Joachim Schipper wrote:
Some monitoring script sounds like the way to go, though.
Perhaps you're right. Monit looks good - presumably I could install that both
on the firewalls and the webservers, so that in the event of an httpd failure
the local monit could
On 2006/04/21 12:08, Ashley Moran wrote:
I think rdr/source-hash avoids the need to use CARP on the web servers,
Failover should be quicker if you CARP on the web servers. Otherwise
you have to wait until the monitoring script on the rdr box picks up the
failure.
which should avoid SSL
On Friday 21 April 2006 09:08, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
I use 'heartbeast' for several years now and would not do so again.
Failover always takes several seconds because of ARP change propagation.
I though Heartbeast ( I'm assuming you wrote that on purpose :) ) was the
flagship output of
On Friday 21 April 2006 12:18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/04/21 12:08, Ashley Moran wrote:
I think rdr/source-hash avoids the need to use CARP on the web servers,
Failover should be quicker if you CARP on the web servers. Otherwise
you have to wait until the monitoring script on the rdr
Hi,
I'm about to setup up ADSL at home for the first time, using the
following network topology:
ADSL+---+ +--+ +--+
to - | DSL |--- | firewall | - | ethernet |
ISP | modem | pppoe | + router | | switch |
What do the client systems run?
if they are on windows 2000/2003 Domain, use a GPO and block them as
untrusted.
Just a thought because what you want is done above PF
James
- Original Message -
From: tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Friday, April 21,
Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
The firewall/router/nat box is (will be when I get this setup)
an old 486 laptop with 2 pcmcia ethernet cards, running 3.9-stable.
(Yes, I've ordered a CD; until it arrives I'm using 3.8-stable.)
I already have the (external) DSL modem, and from talking to other
Ashley Moran wrote:
I though Heartbeast ( I'm assuming you wrote that on purpose :) ) was the
flagship output of the Linux HA project. Can the same be achieved on *BSD
heartbeat is ancient. They want to replace it with keepalived.
with CARP and some monitoring software? Or have I
Original message
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:30:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jonathan Thornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: advantages/disadvantages of kernel pppoe(4) vs userland pppoe(8)?
To: misc@openbsd.org
Cc: Jonathan Thornburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm about to setup up ADSL at home
Hi,
I'm about to setup up ADSL at home for the first time, using the
following network topology:
ADSL+---+ +--+ +--+
to - | DSL |--- | firewall | - | ethernet |
ISP | modem | pppoe | + router | | switch |
I think rdr/source-hash avoids the need to use CARP on
the web servers,
Failover should be quicker if you CARP on the web servers. Otherwise
you have to wait until the monitoring script on the rdr box
picks up the
failure.
That's a good point about failover time. The only issue
Falk Husemann wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That doesn`t mean I can use *.google.com but I would be able to use
www.google.com if I understood the FAQ and the manual correctly.
Because I may not be bale to know every Hostname in a foreign network a
Joker would be a neat solution.
Is it maybe
Hi all,
I have this strange problem with my openbsd setup. I have a box which I use
for one of my networks gateway. It has two NICs. One for internal network
with ethernet connection (fxp0 driver) and one for external network
(internet) with pppoe connection (rl0 driver). pppoe connection is set
On Friday 21 April 2006 11:10, Stefan Kaltenbrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Feustel wrote:
On Saturday 15 April 2006 17:53, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:39:10 -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
AMD Pacifica and Intel's VT make possible the virtualization of unmodified
On Friday 21 April 2006 15:50, you wrote:
I must be missing something. Is this a mission critical setup? If
so why not just get it over with and use hardware LB with checking
and let the servers do a single job well. There are several cheap LB
on ebay radware and the like that are surely
On Friday 21 April 2006 13:54, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
All heartbeat does is having one virtual IP on the live server. In case
of failure, a script runs which takes up the IP on the secondary, while
some arp faking is done to update the arp tables. You can then also
start services in the
Hi all,
Does anyone know a book, tutorial or documents of any kind that treat
about secure programming over OpenBSD? Since OpenBSD implements many
secure system calls and lots of other methods that are much more
secure that respective implementations in other platforms: mkstem,
strlcpy,
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 10:36:27AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 19.04.2006 at 12:57:16 +0100, tony sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/04/06, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, if someone of you comes across good E3 cards, please drop me a
note. Otherwise,
On 4/21/06, Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know a book, tutorial or documents of any kind that treat
about secure programming over OpenBSD? Since OpenBSD implements many
secure system calls and lots of other methods that are much more
secure that respective implementations
Thanks for your answears !
You gave me nice ideas, if I'm resuming to admin my remote OpenBSD boxes :
- Monitoring: Cacti, Nagios, Argus and a centralised syslog
- Distribued Configs: with CVS or maybe http://www.allard.nu/pfw/ for
PF or Rsync/Rdisf/FTP
- Distribued scripts: ssh
It will be
Howdy
I'm having a problem with an LSI929 FC card on a Tyan dual Opteron board.
Here's the dmesg snippet specific to the 929 card:
mpt2 at pci5 dev 9 function 0 Symbios Logic FC929 rev 0x02: irq 10
mpt2: mpt_read_cfg_header: Config Info Status 22
mpt2: Could not retrieve Manufacturing Page 4
On 20/04/06, xanadu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for your answears !
You gave me nice ideas, if I'm resuming to admin my remote OpenBSD boxes :
- Monitoring: Cacti, Nagios, Argus and a centralised syslog
- Distribued Configs: with CVS or maybe http://www.allard.nu/pfw/ for
PF or
Hello, I have a Nexcom NR2107 (uses 2x xeon em64t processors) with two
intel 82571EB controllers with 4 ports each. I get the following panic
after installing openbsd 3.9 amd64.
Before the install, the cd39.iso will boot, but won't load em0 or em6
(each of which are the first port of the 2
I'm debbuging something weird here. Before I put together a full and
sanitized error report, just a quick question: is anybody else seeing DPD to
just stop working after a couple of hours, or is it just me my setup?
I have some pre-3.9 -current (mid March or so) machines running some IPsec
Hi Guys/Gals
I have a stock install of OpenBSD/BGP 3.8 and I'm finding some weird
happenings. I'm part of the Virt-IX project (http://www.virt-ix.net/),
which is a training ground for learning BGP.
The Setup is an OpenVPN connection to a peering LAN (194.126.235.0/24_
where other participants
On 21/04/06, Ben Ashton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys/Gals
I have a stock install of OpenBSD/BGP 3.8 and I'm finding some weird
happenings. I'm part of the Virt-IX project (http://www.virt-ix.net/),
which is a training ground for learning BGP.
The Setup is an OpenVPN connection to a
I don't have the magic cable to hook up my FC929 boards to my FC
enclosure. Anyone interested in donating an optical FC-LC cable?
Diana Eichert wrote:
Howdy
I'm having a problem with an LSI929 FC card on a Tyan dual Opteron board.
Here's the dmesg snippet specific to the 929 card:
mpt2 at
My cd is on the way but won't have it till monday. I know about the flames
but somebody please tar up the zaurus dir for me and post it please. Thx.
Andrew Patterson
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Diana Eichert wrote:
Marco
Would this work, LC/FC Duplex Multi Mode 5M Cable 2Gb/s to 1Gb/s device?
http://cgi.ebay.com/LC-FC-Duplex-Multi-Mode-5M-Cable-2Gb-s-to-1Gb-s-device_W0QQitemZ9715347169QQcategoryZ3704QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
I've also asked my
So I really meant SC-LC.
Marco Peereboom wrote:
I don't have the magic cable to hook up my FC929 boards to my FC
enclosure. Anyone interested in donating an optical FC-LC cable?
Diana Eichert wrote:
Howdy
I'm having a problem with an LSI929 FC card on a Tyan dual Opteron board.
Here's the
Is there any way to override the flag on a device that permits it from
being mounted twice?MNT_FORCE isn't it.
I've got an embedded environment I'm setting up where I want to transfer
the root (/) file system from an rd(4) to an MFS.
To do this, I have to add some customizations to copy() in
43 matches
Mail list logo
