On Fri, 26 May 2006, Yakov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3.9 dmesg says
> ...
> pccom3 on puc0 .. PCI USR modem..
> ...
>
> and there is another 2 com ports in my box, they are detected as
> expected: pccom0, pccom1
>
> The question is how can i find which entry in /dev/[tty|cua|cuaU|..]
> is for my mod
Hi,
On 3.9 dmesg says
...
pccom3 on puc0 .. PCI USR modem..
...
and there is another 2 com ports in my box, they are detected as
expected: pccom0, pccom1
The question is how can i find which entry in /dev/[tty|cua|cuaU|..]
is for my modem device??
I tryed with
# cu -l /dev/tty02
# cu -l /dev/cu
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
> Is there a working pf.conf that anyone can share with me? I can
> connect to the server but PASV mode fails with the normal error that
> it can't make the data connection.
You have to run two instances of the proxy. One as normal that listens on
t
Hi,
I'm using C++, so i wanted to ask if there some replacement for splint
to use with C++.
With best regards,
Yakov &
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 10:51:32PM -0700, akonsu wrote:
> hello,
>
> i have a windows (ntfs) partition and an openbsd partition on my hard drive.
> i am trying to mount the windows partition. but no success so far:
>
> mount -t ntfs /dev/wd0i /mnt
>
> it fails with an error message saying that o
hello,
i have a windows (ntfs) partition and an openbsd partition on my hard drive.
i am trying to mount the windows partition. but no success so far:
mount -t ntfs /dev/wd0i /mnt
it fails with an error message saying that operation is not supported.
below is output of both fdisk and disklabel.
You are welcome!
PS: I am payed to maked others life simple, and in general the simpler
the life the more expensive the bill gets.
On 5/25/06, akonsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thank you for telling me what i should do. this makes life much easier.
2006/5/25, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
I am wanting up upgrade a 3.8 system to 3.9
I normally do this by backing up any data I need and doing a clean
install.
It's mainly the whitelisted entries I want to keep over the rebuild.
I figured out to extract them by going:
spamdb | grep WHITE | cut -d "|" -f 2 > ~/spamd-white
But i can't f
Original message from Diego Giagio [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> ...
> I have a concern, thought: why most applications don't use the 'static'
> keyword for
> functions with internal linkage ? Wouldn't that avoid function name clashes
> when
> developing large programs?
Either because:
1. there are d
Hello everybody,
For example I'm installing an OpenBSD box to perform a text file
processing, and are 8 files, 1GB each one, every hour; my AWK script
worked well in Linux and Solaris and realy I think that it will work
fine in OpenBSD too.
I will tell you the results.
Regards,
Julian
On 5/25/06, Diego Giagio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lately I've been reading OpenBSD code, both user-level and kernel-level,
and I find it very clean and well organized. I have a concern,
thought: why most applications don't use the 'static' keyword for
functions with internal linkage ? Wouldn't
Hi Craig,
> So @wantlib are in base sets then?
Well, no.
Look again at the output you posted:
# pkg_info -f gd-2.0.33p2.tgz | egrep "(depend|wantlib)"
@depend converters/libiconv:libiconv-*:libiconv-1.9.2p3
@depend graphics/jpeg:jpeg-*:jpeg-6bp3
@depend graphics/png:png-*:png-1.2.8
@wantlib c
Does the BIOS show a message that there is a tape device hooked up?
There should be a MPT scsi card showing up that has a tape drive
attached to it. If not you have some sort of cabling or hardware issue.
Victor wrote:
Marco,
With your question in mind, I more closely examined the BIOSs.
Th
There some things in life i do really enjoy playing with. I like
programming and related things, right now i am working on a series of
programs for replacing traditional unix tools, dues to security,
performance and even license concerns. I believe i will have
everything done in the end of the up
Because it'll clash. Clashing is good.
Diego Giagio wrote:
Lately I've been reading OpenBSD code, both user-level and kernel-level,
and I find it very clean and well organized. I have a concern,
thought: why most applications don't use the 'static' keyword for
functions with internal linkage ?
| Or did you mean that only one external IP should be able to send e-mail to
| your own local domain??? That would sound a little bit strange. So I do not
| assume that..
Actually, yes. The only smtp connections to this mta should be from my
antispam gateway. Some
spammers are bypassing what m
--- Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What we need to keep in mind, is that techincally, just because we
> keep our mind in security for the first concern, it should not take
> as an excuse for delivering slow processing.
>
> Sacrifice correctness for speed is completing nonsense. I cannot
Marco,
With your question in mind, I more closely examined the BIOSs.
The tape drive is on channel B. I have examined the system BIOS and found that
channel B is configured as SCSI, as indicated below:
Integrated Devices ->
Embedded RAID Controller..RAID Enabled
Ch
Lately I've been reading OpenBSD code, both user-level and kernel-level,
and I find it very clean and well organized. I have a concern,
thought: why most applications don't use the 'static' keyword for
functions with internal linkage ? Wouldn't that avoid function
name clashes when developing larg
* akonsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-25 23:02]:
> i read somewhere that openbsd is not as scalable as other OS.
nonsense.
depends heavily on what exactly you are going to do.
in soem cases, we blow away everybody else easily.
in same cases, others are faster.
in some cases, others crash faster :)
* Jeff Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-25 22:53]:
> Same spindle, but 8x as fast as the 10k SCSI disks.
guess in the dark: the scsi drives have the write cache disabled, the
ide drives enabled. at least that tends to be what the defaults are.
--
BS Web Services, http://www.bsws.de/
OpenBSD-ba
Hi
so. does anyone know whether performance has improved since? i am asking
this question just for educational purposes.
thanks
konstantin
Your question is purely hypothetical!
"Does anyone know whether performance has improved since?", since when?
Compared to what? Running what services? D
What we need to keep in mind, is that techincally, just because we
keep our mind in security for the first concern, it should not take as
an excuse for delivering slow processing.
Sacrifice correctness for speed is completing nonsense. I cannot even
try to understand it: what is the value of a pr
thank you for telling me what i should do. this makes life much easier.
2006/5/25, Bob Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > i read somewhere that openbsd is not as scalable as other OS. this
> atricle,
> > for example. http://www.serverwatch.com/sreviews/article.php/3415651
>
>I read somewhere
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 12:37:04AM +0200, Per-Olov Sj?holm wrote:
| > I would like to accept mail from only one specified SMTP server
| > and reject all others. I tried '*.*REJECT' in /etc/mail/access
| > but that doesn't seem to work.
| >
| > Mike Spenard
|
| Change to...
| X.Y.Z.W RELAY
| i
On Thu, May 25, 2006, Mike Spenard wrote:
> I would like to accept mail from only one specified SMTP server
> and reject all others. I tried '*.*REJECT' in /etc/mail/access
> but that doesn't seem to work.
The documentation specifies the valid entries.
Simply use pf to block everyone to acces
Hi
I was wrong & i'm sorry for my mistake.
I didn't veryify is it really use more than one certificate because i
was shure that it must wor that's why (i didn't think that there may
be function to choose some other, that is not working added then?:S>).
I've just try how it's work & it uses only
As a matter of fact, yes, Linux and FreeBSD are indeed more "scalable"
and usually faster in heavy workloads that involve databases, heavy
input/output loads etc in multiprocessor systems.
However, the question here is:
Are you willing to sacrifice OpenBSD's security and correctness to get
the SMP
On 5/25/06, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also "From the beginning, every line of code has been continually
audited for flaws and vulnerabilities (this is an ongoing process
since hackers are always developing new techniques)"
It's not that 'hackers' are making new techniques as much
> i read somewhere that openbsd is not as scalable as other OS. this atricle,
> for example. http://www.serverwatch.com/sreviews/article.php/3415651
I read somewhere that Windows was more Scalable tha linux too.
I'm sure you should go run that.
-Bob
On Thursday 25 May 2006 23.36, you wrote:
> I would like to accept mail from only one specified SMTP server
> and reject all others. I tried '*.*REJECT' in /etc/mail/access
> but that doesn't seem to work.
>
> Mike Spenard
Change to...
X.Y.Z.W RELAY
in /etc/mail/access and rebuild the access.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bugger.
>
> # cd /
> # tar xzf /var/spool/ftp/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/i386/xbase39.tgz
> # cd $OLDPWD
> # pkg_add mailgraph-1.12.tgz
> mailgraph-1.12:gd-2.0.33p2: complete
> mailgraph-1.12:rrdtool-1.0.49p3: complete
> mailgraph-1.12: complete
Bad habit to unpack *.tgz distribut
On 5/25/06, Eric Furman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 25 May 2006 13:53:26 -0700, "akonsu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> hello,
>
> i read somewhere that openbsd is not as scalable as other OS. this
> atricle,
> for example. http://www.serverwatch.com/sreviews/article.php/3415651
> but the re
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 11:17:38PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> > I'm unable to install a package: gd-2.0.33p2
>
> Do you habe xbase39.tgz installed on that particular machine?
I do now.
>
> You appear to confuse package and library dependencies.
I can confuse much more than th
I would like to accept mail from only one specified SMTP server
and reject all others. I tried '*.*REJECT' in /etc/mail/access
but that doesn't seem to work.
Mike Spenard
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:12:03PM -0500, Ben Kelley wrote:
>
> > Can't install gd-2.0.33p2: lib not found fontconfig.3.0
> ^^^
Yep, spotted that, but could not find a package called fontconfig.
>
> Did you install xbase?
No, didn't
On 25/05/06, "J. Rodrigo Anabalsn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all.
Hi have a problem. I Installing OpenBSD 3.9 in me PC and in the X mode
(# startx) after one minute no used (aproximatly), the screen to off.
You don't run X as root, do you?
Anyway, it might be a DPMS issue with your monitor
Hi Craig,
> I'm unable to install a package: gd-2.0.33p2
Do you habe xbase39.tgz installed on that particular machine?
> Error is:
> # pkg_add mailgraph-1.12.tgz
> Can't install gd-2.0.33p2: lib not found fontconfig.3.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ ls /usr/X11R6/lib/libfontconfig.so.3.0
/usr/X11R6/lib
On Thu, 25 May 2006 13:53:26 -0700 akonsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello,
>
> i read somewhere that openbsd is not as scalable as other OS.
Right.
> so. does anyone know whether performance has improved since?
What does performance have to do with it? You asked about scalability.
OpenBSD
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Craig Skinner
> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 15:56
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Can't install gd-2.0.33p2: lib not found freetype.13.1
>
> Hi list,
>
> I'm unable to install a package: gd-2.0.33p2
On Thu, 25 May 2006 13:53:26 -0700, "akonsu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> hello,
>
> i read somewhere that openbsd is not as scalable as other OS. this
> atricle,
> for example. http://www.serverwatch.com/sreviews/article.php/3415651
> but the reviews and benchmarks that i could find are about two
Hi all.
Hi have a problem. I Installing OpenBSD 3.9 in me PC and in the X mode
(# startx) after one minute no used (aproximatly), the screen to off.
what is the problem?, how have solution this. when the screen is off no
have start up the screen, only set the cursor (_) and nothing more.
P.D
On 5/25/06, akonsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hello,
i read somewhere that openbsd is not as scalable as other OS. this atricle,
for example. http://www.serverwatch.com/sreviews/article.php/3415651
but the reviews and benchmarks that i could find are about two years old or
so. does anyone know
Hi list,
I'm unable to install a package: gd-2.0.33p2
This is the first time I have had a problem of this kind.
Running a new install of 3.9 release on a i386.
Error is:
# pkg_add mailgraph-1.12.tgz
Can't install gd-2.0.33p2: lib not found fontconfig.3.0
Even by looking in the dependency tree:
hello,
i read somewhere that openbsd is not as scalable as other OS. this atricle,
for example. http://www.serverwatch.com/sreviews/article.php/3415651
but the reviews and benchmarks that i could find are about two years old or
so. does anyone know whether performance has improved since? i am ask
Hi since iostream is a standard library you should write
#include
As said by someone else iostream.h is an older header.
the <> denotes that the library is in a default library path.
(which is implementation defined for the C++ compiler)
There was one who had it working with #include "iostr
On Thu, 25 May 2006, Steve Shockley wrote:
Jeff Ross wrote:
Backing up root filesystem:
copying /dev/rsd0a to /dev/rsd0n
One spindle, disk thrashes.
Backing up root filesystem:
copying /dev/rwd0a to /dev/rwd1m
Two spindles, disk does not thrash.
I wondered about that, but here is
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > It's been imported as the new ftp-proxy:
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?m=111708277030478
>
> This is good news. However, I can't get the configuration
> correct to
> allow me to put an FTP server behind a PF firewall, and allow
> inbound
> client con
On 25 May 2006, at 20:49, Ray Lai wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 08:28:12PM +0100, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
>> The last mention of this on misc@ was march, and not much prior to
>> that. Does anybody have any good/bad experiences with pftpx? I plan
>> to use it to proxy incoming FTP connections, t
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 08:28:12PM +0100, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
> The last mention of this on misc@ was march, and not much prior to
> that. Does anybody have any good/bad experiences with pftpx? I plan
> to use it to proxy incoming FTP connections, the opposite of what I'd
> use ftp-proxy f
Jeff Ross wrote:
Backing up root filesystem:
copying /dev/rsd0a to /dev/rsd0n
One spindle, disk thrashes.
Backing up root filesystem:
copying /dev/rwd0a to /dev/rwd1m
Two spindles, disk does not thrash.
Hi,
The last mention of this on misc@ was march, and not much prior to
that. Does anybody have any good/bad experiences with pftpx? I plan
to use it to proxy incoming FTP connections, the opposite of what I'd
use ftp-proxy for...
Gaby
--
Junkets for bunterish lickspittles since 1998!
htt
Toni Mueller wrote:
> -
> #include "iostream.h"
> int main(){ cout << "Hello World!" << endl; return 0;}
> -
>
> Compiling it goes like this:
>
> $ c++ testit.cc
> /tmp//cch21612.o(.text+0x1c): In function `main':
> : undefined reference to `endl(o
s/iostream.h/iostream/
sorry.
Don't use iostream.h, as it's old, and only there for backwards
compatibility. If possible, use instead.
On 5/25/06, Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to compile a small C++ program (part of building the HylaFAX
port). This is the program:
-
#in
whats that?
how about
#include
using namepsace std;
?
(don't forget to change the "..." to <...>)
steffen
On Thu, 25 May 2006 18:27:30 +0200 Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Hello,
:
:
: I'd like to compile a small C++ program (part of building the HylaFAX
: port). This is the p
Marco,
Thanks very much for your reply! I will re-examine the BIOSs with your
question in mind. I have visited but not focused on the system BIOS, and
my inspections of the PERC BIOS have mostly been purposed towards
determining whether or not it could see and test the tape drive, and
getting the
Here's a snip from /etc/daily on a server here with 4 10,000K Seagate
Cheetah disks:
Backing up root filesystem:
copying /dev/rsd0a to /dev/rsd0n
31955+1 records in
31955+1 records out
261775872 bytes transferred in 849.226 secs (308252 bytes/sec)
** /dev/rsd0n
** Last Mounted on /
** Phase 1 -
Hello,
I'd like to compile a small C++ program (part of building the HylaFAX
port). This is the program:
-
#include "iostream.h"
int main(){ cout << "Hello World!" << endl; return 0;}
-
Compiling it goes like this:
$ c++ testit.cc
/tmp//cch21612
On 5/25/06, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
viq wrote:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 09:22, Jan Johansson wrote:
>> akonsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For the NTLDR you want the PBR (Partition Boot Record) not the
>> MBR (Master Boot Record). I changed the of= for correct the
>> terminology
viq wrote:
On Thursday 25 May 2006 09:22, Jan Johansson wrote:
akonsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
dd if=/dev/rwd0c of=mbr count=1
Here is your error
dd if=/dev/rwd0a of=pbr count=1
For the NTLDR you want the PBR (Partition Boot Record) not the
MBR (Master Boot Record). I changed the of= for c
viq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While at the subject, you need to run this every time you
> upgrade bootblocks. What would be the result of not updating
> bootblocks when upgrading from snapshot?
Sounds dangerous to me. Will old bootblocks be able to boot the
kernel?
> Or not rerunning that com
On Thursday 25 May 2006 09:22, Jan Johansson wrote:
> akonsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > dd if=/dev/rwd0c of=mbr count=1
>
> Here is your error
>
> dd if=/dev/rwd0a of=pbr count=1
>
> For the NTLDR you want the PBR (Partition Boot Record) not the
> MBR (Master Boot Record). I changed the of= for
akonsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dd if=/dev/rwd0c of=mbr count=1
Here is your error
dd if=/dev/rwd0a of=pbr count=1
For the NTLDR you want the PBR (Partition Boot Record) not the
MBR (Master Boot Record). I changed the of= for correct the
terminology the important part is the if= device. I us
I had this problem a while ago...
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=114021971311499&w=2
/bkw
On 24/05/06, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adam wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an odd problem with my 3.9 server. I can not seem to push more
> than 2.5 - 3.0 mbps per connection over t
I've not used dvd's with obsd myself, but I assume you've read
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq13.html#playDVD
AND the link about how to mount DVDs.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=mount_cd9660&sektion=8
If the mount doesn't work, reply with error and the commands you ran.
/bkw
On 25/
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:56:20PM -0700, akonsu wrote:
| hello,
|
| i have openbsd on the first partition on my hard drive, and windows xp on
| the second partition.
| i made the windows partition active.
|
| this is the command that i used to get the openbsd's mbr:
|
| dd if=/dev/rwd0c of=mbr cou
On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 11:56:20PM -0700, akonsu wrote:
> this is the command that i used to get the openbsd's mbr:
>
> dd if=/dev/rwd0c of=mbr count=1
>
actually you need the pbr (partition boot record) not the mbr, look at FAQ 4.8,
your command should look like:
dd if=/dev/rwd0a of= bs=512 cou
hello,
i have openbsd on the first partition on my hard drive, and windows xp on
the second partition.
i made the windows partition active.
this is the command that i used to get the openbsd's mbr:
dd if=/dev/rwd0c of=mbr count=1
i copied the file "mbr" to my windows partition and added the fol
69 matches
Mail list logo
