Geez, I'm having so much fun with computers this weekend.
So I bit the bullet and hauled a monitor over to my headless "TV capture"
system and configure X on it also. FXTV runs aok locally, but I can get
it to crash by running either Jake Meuser's bsdavrec or mplayer/mencoder.
I can actually run
2006/8/6, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I use opterons all over the place. Works fine with i386 and amd64.
"All versions of the AMD Athlon 64 processors and their clones are supported."
Are Opterons considered to be clones of AMD Athlon 64? The Opterons
came first. :-)
Best
Martin
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 05:52:29PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I use opterons all over the place. Works fine with i386 and amd64.
That's *exactly* what I was hoping to hear. :)
--
Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD Users Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/
http://w
I use opterons all over the place. Works fine with i386 and amd64.
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 03:39:44PM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> I'm looking into some rack mount servers, and I've been looking hard at
> some nice Opteron systems. Then I visited the amd64 platform page and
> saw that all Atho
I'm looking into some rack mount servers, and I've been looking hard at
some nice Opteron systems. Then I visited the amd64 platform page and
saw that all Athon CPUs are supported - no mention on Opteron. Checking
the archives I see people using Opterons. I'm just a bit confused. Are
people running
Hello,
The glibc C runtime library has a function __libc_freeres to free any memory
allocated by the runtime. What is the equivalent in OpenBSD's libc?
Regards,
Vesselin.
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 07:25:55AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
>
> > If so how do you do it? My thought is to use ffmpeg to capture
> > video off bktr(4).
>
> i did use ffmpeg with some moderate success, but because i didn't
> pay much attention
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 01:42:17PM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote:
> On 8/5/06, Felix Kronlage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I think, silent by default with -v for more informations seems more
> >appropiate too.
>
> Would you care to elaborate why you want the default behaviour (notify
> on a changed
2006/8/5, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 08:22:47PM +0200, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
> What are main the reasons this is not enabled by default? Most
> mailservers could use some filtering options by default.
It's enabled for more than two years.
Thanks for your answ
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 08:22:47PM +0200, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
> What are main the reasons this is not enabled by default? Most
> mailservers could use some filtering options by default.
It's enabled for more than two years.
On 8/4/06, Hasan USTUNDAG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=33480
script works fine for me.
You can also use ping to check host availibilty or perl module
Net::Telnet to check port availibilty for other protocols.
That pf.conf looks ok, but his script i
Hi all,
I am getting sick and tired of all the crap I'm receiving so I decided
to do some spamfiltering on my OpenBSD mailserver. I checked the ports
and see several nice milters so I start installing. Later I find out
that I need to recompile sendmail with milter support, something I
don't like
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 01:30:28PM -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote:
>
> $ CONFIGURE_ARGS=--enable-delay-pools make
err, in your case
$ FLAVOR="transparent snmp" CONFIGURE_ARGS=--enable-delay-pools make
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 07:25:55AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
> Does anyone use their OpenBSD boxes to capture video without using any X
> tools?
nope; i was always trying to use it to capture video while watching the
display(station2) :/
> If so how do you do it? My thought is to use ff
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 09:48:23PM +0700, sonjaya wrote:
>
> 2006/08/06 04:09:49| parseConfigFile: line 3576 unrecognized: 'delay_pools
> 2'
> 2006/08/06 04:09:49| parseConfigFile: line 3580 unrecognized: 'delay_class
> 1 2'
the squid package doesn't have delay pools enabled -- the option is
Hi,
Nick Holland wrote:
...
OpenBSD does not blank the console screen after booting without you
deliberately setting things to do so. This is clearly not OpenBSD at
work. Don't try to fix broken hardware configuration through OpenBSD,
fix the hardware.
You apparently have some strange "fea
dear all
i try activate my cache server ( squid 2.5 stable with tranparan
proxy n snmp from package ) in my openbsd 3.9 server :
here my spefication my server :
1. openbsd 3.9
- squid transparan + snmp from package
2. here my squid.conf
# DELAY POLL curve --
Andreas Bartelt wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to disable to console screensafer in OpenBSD?
Problem description: after about 60 seconds after booting, the console
screen blanks and my monitor turns off (disabling power management on my
monitor doesn't help). Sometimes, shortly after starting Xorg
Hi,
Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
xorg.conf has a DPMS option which turns the monitor in powersave after a
while.
Check if that option appear in your xorg.conf.
"xset q" also know if it's enabled or not.
thanks for the hint. I suppose, I didn't describe the problem clearly.
My Xorg screensafer wo
xorg.conf has a DPMS option which turns the monitor in powersave after a while.
Check if that option appear in your xorg.conf.
"xset q" also know if it's enabled or not.
/bkw
On 05/08/06, Andreas Bartelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to disable to console screensafer in OpenBSD?
Hi,
is there a way to disable to console screensafer in OpenBSD?
Problem description: after about 60 seconds after booting, the console
screen blanks and my monitor turns off (disabling power management on my
monitor doesn't help). Sometimes, shortly after starting Xorg, my
monitor also turns
Hi Alex,
I wrote such a Code for my OpenBSD 3.6 machine. I just loaded the current
CVS snapshot, patched the sources and made a CVS diff. Here is a patch
that implements a new sysctl variable called 'kern.maxusrfiles' what is
the maximum number of filedescriptors available for normal users. 64 FDs
On 8/5/06, Felix Kronlage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think, silent by default with -v for more informations seems more
appropiate too.
Would you care to elaborate why you want the default behaviour (notify
on a changed timeout) altered?
The proposed patch by the OP doesn't cause changes for
You might want to familiarize yourself with ulimits.
Alex Brodsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following is a known issue, from at least 2002, but I am not sure
> how it was resolved.
>
> Problem: The default configuration of OpenBSD allows any user to
> incapacitate the machine by exhausting the kernel
24 matches
Mail list logo
