Thanks, for the links, I didn't go that far back in time for my research !
Well I guess I'll get back to the list when the install will give me a
result with the included driver (whether it works or not).
Josh Grosse a icrit :
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 03:53:21PM +1100, Bertrand CHERRIER wrote:
>
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 03:53:21PM +1100, Bertrand CHERRIER wrote:
> ...the generic kernel does not have the
> twe driver, while the i386 one has.
> Any special reason for this ? ...
Previous thread regarding twe on amd64:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=112674319520417&w=2
Previ
Greetings,
I've started the process of migrating a few servers from Gentoo to OpenBSD.
All my servers are using 3ware RAID cards ... I've read the forums about
3ware !
The first server is running a P4, and was easily done.
The second one is the object of my question. It's running a bi-opteron,
Nick Holland wrote:
> Use vi or emacs. :)
Additionally for emacs users: You can define how c code should be
indented for the openbsd project with this code in your .emacs.
(defun KNF-c-style ()
"OpenBSD KNF C-style."
(interactive)
(local-set-key "\C-c\C-c" 'compile)
(c-set-style "bsd")
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 05:38:19AM +1000, Scott Radvan wrote:
> Or am I missing something which could allow the install to use all
> available bandwidth?
Can you first choose S for shell, run the necessary sysctl commands,
then exit the shell and start the install process as usual?
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:29:54AM +0200, Jan Johansson wrote:
> Hello.
>
> ssh on a recent snapshot does not like trying gssapi-with-mic when there
> is no ticket file.
>
> I did not see any relevant patches in the CVS web.
According to Simon Wilkinson (the author of the code that makes that
li
> > > But, out of curiosity, is there a reasoning for not including the
> > > sysctl binary on the install image, and hence not allowing sysctl
> > > modifications during the installation of these snapshots?
> >
> > Besides that the install media are totally full?
>
> Ok, hadn't considered that.
> The OpenBSD developers spend a lot of time making code fit what they
> call "KNF" -- Kernel Normal Form, documented in style(7)
style(9)
-p.
Kyrre Nygerd wrote:
Hello people,
I'm looking for the best ways to create a line of code beautification
(reformatting) scripts -- one for C, one for Ruby, one for Bash and one
for web development languages like XHTML, XML, CSS, PHP and Ajax.
Whether as frontline warriors or household maids, t
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:40:45 -0600
Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But, out of curiosity, is there a reasoning for not including the
> > sysctl binary on the install image, and hence not allowing sysctl
> > modifications during the installation of these snapshots?
>
> Besides that th
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:55:40PM +0200, openbsd misc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for a volume manager comparable to LVM. Is there
> a well-tended solution for openbsd? I want to be able to
> create / resize partitions at runtime, raid functionality
> is not needed.
No.
You can just ccd eve
This sounds like bad hardware to me. Have you tried installing your CD
set
elsewhere?
Ok, so I made a memtest86 boot cd to test out this machine. At the moment
it is 59% of the way through the testing and it's only found 7,016 memory
errors, that's not that bad, right? :-)
So bad hardware it
[Bleat bleat.. "Don't install the compiler it makes it a "little bit safer"]
[Bleat bleat "No it doesn't make a difference"]
Mooseapples. Both herds are wrong. *Not* having the compiler makes the system
*Less* secure, because it's more of a PITA for the admin to apply
fixes. Doesn't
matter
On 8/24/06, Nick Shank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
Regardless, I was simply asking if 1) The possibility of a user who has
access to the system had been thought of, and 2) Would it matter.
Umm, hasn't this whole discussion been about the situation when the
user has access? If they don't ha
> But, out of curiosity, is there a reasoning for not including the
> sysctl binary on the install image, and hence not allowing sysctl
> modifications during the installation of these snapshots?
Besides that the install media are totally full?
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:44:04PM -0700, Edward Ray wrote:
[...]
> >>
> # export PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/
>
> # pkg_add bash-3.1.1p0.tgz
> Error from ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/:
> Unknown command.
> Not an
I have used tidy (for html) and perltidy to clean up messy/generated
code in the past. Both are extremely customizable in the format they
output code.
Tim Donahue
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:59:31 +0200
Kyrre Nygerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> I'm looking for the best ways to cre
This is annoying. Every time I try to build with packages I get an error
with libiconv-1.9.2p3 . Unfortunately, this failure screws up every other
package I try to install
>>
# export PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/
# pkg_add bash-3.1.
Good day.
This is not a request to do anything - just a statement of fact.
On the server-side, when performing DHE-enabled SSL_accept(), I have been
shown that several hundred malloc()/free() calls are made.
CHEERS
--
Jack Bates
Placitas, NM, USA
I play Texas Hold'Em at http://www.fulltiltpoke
Hello,
I'm looking for a volume manager comparable to LVM. Is there
a well-tended solution for openbsd? I want to be able to
create / resize partitions at runtime, raid functionality
is not needed.
Regards
Hagen Volpers
Hello list!
We are planning to buy some Dell PowerEdge 2850's with PERC4e/DCs and
redundant powersupply for good availability. It looks like the
PERC4e/DC (PCIe) is well supported and that's not a problem, it doesnt
mention the PCI-Express version thou.
This is going to be a remote machin
Hi,
I have a machine with FreeBSD (5.3). I cannot use the CD nor the
floppy disk. I have just an access with ssh and KVM.
Which is best the way of installing OpenBSD in this situation?
Thank you very much
Manuel
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 02:59:31PM +0200, Kyrre Nyg?rd wrote:
> to all my code. I find myself always reformatting whatever my
> associates give me. Not that they're bad programmers, they just
> care more about the code itself rather than its structure, and I
> dare not argue with that. When their c
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:38:26PM -0700, Nick Shank wrote:
> Through all of this, and maybe I've just missed it, what happens when a
> user tries to make spl01t.c?
stop it, please, you're killing me.
There is nothing special about your machine that makes binaries compiled
somewhere else not be
Scott Plumlee wrote:
NetNeanderthal wrote:
On 8/24/06, Anton Karpov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Removing compiler doesn't bring much more security to your system,
but it
can make it a little bit safer. Very little bit, but safer. I mean,
if your
system has local root hole, for example, in this
Hello,
You may use a TFTP server on another box.
The simple way may be to use PXE boot method.
You can also use a grub boot sector with grub compiled with support for
your network card. Grub can be compiled with a tftp server, dhcp client
and support for some network cards.
You can build a cust
David Terrell wrote:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:38:26PM -0700, Nick Shank wrote:
Through all of this, and maybe I've just missed it, what happens when a
user tries to make spl01t.c?
stop it, please, you're killing me.
There is nothing special about your machine that makes binaries com
> We are planning to buy some Dell PowerEdge 2850's with PERC4e/DCs and
> redundant powersupply for good availability. It looks like the
> PERC4e/DC (PCIe) is well supported and that's not a problem, it doesnt
> mention the PCI-Express version thou.
I am not using the PCIe models, but I supp
Here is an interesting approach. Could spamd be use here?
I was suggested that may be I fight to much spamer and that I got
reposted to this. Well very possible.
I got a suggested that may be trapitting the connections might help.
Hmmm. Could this be done. Obviously not want to delay connecti
On 8/24/06, Manuel Lamas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have a machine with FreeBSD (5.3). I cannot use the CD nor the
floppy disk. I have just an access with ssh and KVM.
Which is best the way of installing OpenBSD in this situation?
Thank you very much
Manuel
If you have a keyboard and
Hello misc,
I have been installing 4.0- beta snapshots via FTP on a few machines
(i386 and amd64) and after installation, one of the sysctl
modifications I always make is increasing net.inet.tcp.recvspace so I
can make full use of my 9Mbit ADSL2+ line.
While performing installs, I have discovere
> I have a machine with FreeBSD (5.3). I cannot use the CD nor the
> floppy disk. I have just an access with ssh and KVM.
>
> Which is best the way of installing OpenBSD in this situation?
Can you take the HDD out and install it on a machine you do have access to
working CDROM or floppy at?
Alte
* ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-08-24 21:11]:
> I just spent more time than I would have liked to searching for info
> on providing HA/LB via CARP (and possibly other tools) for individual
> services (such as http) rather than IP addresses. I was surprised to
> find just about nothing on the topic
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:00:10PM -0700, ben wrote:
> I just spent more time than I would have liked to searching for info
> on providing HA/LB via CARP (and possibly other tools) for individual
> services (such as http) rather than IP addresses. I was surprised to
> find just about nothing on the
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:09:11PM +0200, Hans van Leeuwen wrote:
> Hello misc,
>
>
> I run a server with two harddiscs running as a software RAID1 using ccd.
Erm... search the archives for why you shouldn't use ccd to mirror and
then think you have a RAID.
> Yesterday I started to import a lar
Hi ben,
On 2006-08-24T12:00, ben wrote:
> I just spent more time than I would have liked to searching for info
> on providing HA/LB via CARP (and possibly other tools) for individual
> services (such as http) rather than IP addresses. I was surprised to
> find just about nothing on the topic since
I just spent more time than I would have liked to searching for info
on providing HA/LB via CARP (and possibly other tools) for individual
services (such as http) rather than IP addresses. I was surprised to
find just about nothing on the topic since it seems like something
people would want to us
Those are intermittent errors that are not relevant to your failure. I did fix
those in -current.
You simply have a dying HDD.
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:09:11PM +0200, Hans van Leeuwen wrote:
> Hello misc,
>
>
> I run a server with two harddiscs running as a software RAID1 using ccd.
> Yester
This sounds like bad hardware to me. Have you tried installing your CD set
elsewhere?
/marco
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:00:50AM -0500, Jeff Bromberger wrote:
> I'm a new openbsd user (or I should say I'm attempting to be) and I'm not
> having a ton of luck here. I bought the cd set (i386) and
On Thursday 24 August 2006 12:48, you wrote:
>
> Would this not qualify as a signature and/or footer?
>
> Other than that, I agree with Marco's comment.
I only bothered to respond with some comments and advice as this issue keeps
coming up every few months.
I left it in on purpose. Are you alw
On 8/24/06, Jeff Bromberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm a new openbsd user (or I should say I'm attempting to be) and I'm not
having a ton of luck here. I bought the cd set (i386) and it arrived
yesterday. During the install, the base39.tgz file seemed to be corrupt and
the install would cr
NetNeanderthal wrote:
On 8/24/06, Anton Karpov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Removing compiler doesn't bring much more security to your system, but it
can make it a little bit safer. Very little bit, but safer. I mean, if
your
system has local root hole, for example, in this case cracker should
Many thanks,
Already have that in place.
But doesn't always help for AOL proxy for example that actually will
have more connection then this.
If you look here:
http://webmaster.info.aol.com/proxyinfo.html
I can have the list of Proxy used for them, so I can also allow this
list to connect
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 04:56:03PM +0200, Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
> I use hotplugd to attach my usbstick. I works well, but I miss a
> detach script which I couldn't find as a example in the manual so I
> wonder if it's necessary. I've tried once to just disconnect the stick
> without umounting the
Joachim Schipper wrote:
Did you already check that the page is, indeed, the page you expect it
to be? And not, say, some botnet-controller?
Yes I did and even moved it and replace it with special hacking of my
own there. (;>
Not that dumm. But thanks for your concern. (;>
Plus it is really
> > If a hacker is on your system, he'll also manage to install
> the compiler
> > himself before using it.
>
> It's still a valid concern. If someone's going to try to
> break into your system and do nefarious deeds, you should be
> trying to make them work for it as much as possible.
Layered
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 12:30:13PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Ryan Corder wrote:
> >On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 20:36 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> >>200.82.74.176 - - [23/Aug/2006:12:42:37 -0400] "GET
> >>/events/index.php?EventID=58 HTTP/1.1" 200 5 "-" "Mozilla/4.0
> >>(compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windo
Hi Tomas,
Tomas wrote on Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:18:26AM +0300:
> Han Boetes wrote:
>> Tomas wrote:
> Thank you very much, I think that's the way I will do it :)
Then do it very carefully!
I see at least one trap you might stumble into...
> It's quicker then compilling all the release...
Proba
If I may ask. One part of my original question was if the CARP interface
is view as a bridge setup as far as Sync Proxy is concern. Is it the
case here? What I understand of the FaQ is clear for not working on
bridge setup, however, it's not clear to me if CARP setup is view as
bridge as well.
Hello misc,
I run a server with two harddiscs running as a software RAID1 using ccd.
Yesterday I started to import a large database in PostgreSQL, and found allot
of these errors in my logs:
error reading: Processor VRM
error code: ae
error code: ae
kcs_sendmsg: 18 22
bmc_io_wait fails : v=88
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 12:30 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> I am now up to 11,149 simultaneous sources for the last 22 hours.
>
> Someone is having fun at my expense.
>
> But still holding on remarkably well!
sounds like it is time to deploy some PF hackery...
table persist
block in quick on $ext
On 8/24/06, Anton Karpov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Removing compiler doesn't bring much more security to your system, but it
can make it a little bit safer. Very little bit, but safer. I mean, if your
system has local root hole, for example, in this case cracker should
compile his sploit someth
marrandy wrote:
On Thursday 24 August 2006 10:51, you wrote:
Remove signatures and footers.
Dan Farrell
Applied Innovations
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would this not qualify as a signature and/or footer?
Other than that, I agree with Marco's comment.
> It's still a valid concern. If someone's going to try to break into
your
> system and do nefarious deeds, you should be trying to make them work
for
> it as much as possible.
>
> Physical security standards recommending not leaving toolboxes outside
> your backdoor so that a thief won't take you
Ryan Corder wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 20:36 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
200.82.74.176 - - [23/Aug/2006:12:42:37 -0400] "GET
/events/index.php?EventID=58 HTTP/1.1" 200 5 "-" "Mozilla/4.0
(compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)"
the following URL may be of interest to
> Dan, is it possible for you to use a different mail server than your
> work's
> Exchange platforms? POP/IMAP and SMTP elsewhere? Yahoo, hotmail, or
> gmail?
It is entirely possible as far as this list is concerned-- I suppose I
have been avoiding this because I wanted have my cake and eat it,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:51:48AM -0400, Dan Farrell
wrote:
>
> I'm forced to use Outlook at work (don't get me
started, I hate it),
> as I'm sure a few others here are... I've tried a
few crappy add-ons
> that will reverse the top-posting nature of Outlook,
and they have all
> failed. If anyon
Hi Siju,
> I 'll stop installing compilers
Still a bad idea IMHO, but this has been discussed to death.
> when OpenBSD incorporates binary system updates ;-)
Please, don't bug the developers about that.
They have explained several times why their time
is better put elsewhere.
Please also note
blah blah blah
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:16:46AM -0400, marrandy wrote:
> On Thursday 24 August 2006 10:51, you wrote:
> > > And dammit don't top post. You're using outlook aren't you? God, fuck
> > > outlook. Fuck outlook and it's shitty non-standard "look let's pretend
> > > the reply button is
-- Original message --
From: "Stephan A. Rickauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Tomas wrote:
> > Yes it's too late, but why to let a hacker to compile his exploits on
> > your system and to go compromising other PCs (from your DMZ or from
> > internet, it doesn't matter).
"Stephan A. Rickauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People from time to time say they don't want to have a compiler
> installed on a productive system due to security issues. I don't
> understand this. Isn't is too late anyway, if someone's already able to
> make use of the compiler?
Yes, its too
On 2006-08-24T16:56, Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
> I use hotplugd to attach my usbstick. I works well, but I miss a
> detach script which I couldn't find as a example in the manual so I
> wonder if it's necessary. I've tried once to just disconnect the stick
> without umounting the FS manually, and it
On Thursday 24 August 2006 10:51, you wrote:
> > And dammit don't top post. You're using outlook aren't you? God, fuck
> > outlook. Fuck outlook and it's shitty non-standard "look let's pretend
> > the reply button is the forward button" design. And then that forces
> > you into top posting because
Jonas Thambert wrote:
Proliant bios Im using is P29 and MegaRAID bios is from mid 2004.
On HP/Compaq servers, P29 refers to the firmware class, i.e. what
motherboard is installed. (Also, if you really have P29 firmware,
you've got a DL380 G3.) You can find a revision history of the P29 BIOS
I'm a new openbsd user (or I should say I'm attempting to be) and I'm not
having a ton of luck here. I bought the cd set (i386) and it arrived
yesterday. During the install, the base39.tgz file seemed to be corrupt and
the install would crash, the kernel would panic and the machine would reboot.
Hi all,
Got this error trying to compile libiconv, which says obviously that I
need automake-1.7.
On my newly-installed obsd system I already have automake, automake-1.4,
automake-1.8, and automake-1.9, and I don't see automake-1.7 in ports or
packages.
Question: What's the best way to appr
I use hotplugd to attach my usbstick. I works well, but I miss a
detach script which I couldn't find as a example in the manual so I
wonder if it's necessary. I've tried once to just disconnect the stick
without umounting the FS manually, and it worked.
messages shows:
Aug 24 16:24:54 venus /bsd:
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 10:51:48AM -0400, Dan Farrell wrote:
>
> I'm forced to use Outlook at work (don't get me started, I hate it), as
> I'm sure a few others here are... I've tried a few crappy add-ons that
> will reverse the top-posting nature of Outlook, and they have all
> failed. If anyone k
> And dammit don't top post. You're using outlook aren't you? God, fuck
> outlook. Fuck outlook and it's shitty non-standard "look let's pretend
> the reply button is the forward button" design. And then that forces
> you into top posting because otherwise it looks like the way the
> message looks
David Gwynne wrote:
> On 24/08/2006, at 7:39 PM, Jonas Thambert wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I'm having problem upgrading a 3.8 stable to 3.9 stable. The server is
>> a Prolian dl380 g2 with a LSI MegaRAID 320-1. When booting the
>> CD it stops right after ami driver is loaded:
>
> can you try a
Sean Hafeez wrote:
Can someone help me. I am quite stuck. I have spend hours trying
various combinations in order to get an 3.9 box bring up a tunnel to a
NetScreen 25.
Below is all the information. I have full control over both boxes and
I am willing to try anything at this point.
On 24/08/2006, at 7:39 PM, Jonas Thambert wrote:
Hello list,
I'm having problem upgrading a 3.8 stable to 3.9 stable. The server is
a Prolian dl380 g2 with a LSI MegaRAID 320-1. When booting the
CD it stops right after ami driver is loaded:
can you try a snapshot and see if the problem still
Anton Karpov wrote:
> Removing compiler doesn't bring much more security to your system, but
> it can make it a little bit safer. Very little bit, but safer. I mean,
> if your system has local root hole, for example, in this case cracker
> should compile his sploit somethere outside your box, and t
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 21:53 -0700, Edward Ray wrote:
> It has been awhile since I used ports, and have not kept up on the latest
> OpenBSD stuff. What and where are packages?
everything that is in ports, just compiled for you already. check your
local mirror.
later.
ryanc
--
Ryan Corder <[EMA
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 20:36 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> 200.82.74.176 - - [23/Aug/2006:12:42:37 -0400] "GET
> /events/index.php?EventID=58 HTTP/1.1" 200 5 "-" "Mozilla/4.0
> (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)"
the following URL may be of interest to you:
http://g
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 02:59:31PM +0200, Kyrre Nyg?rd wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> I'm looking for the best ways to create a line of code beautification
> (reformatting) scripts -- one for C, one for Ruby, one for Bash and
> one for web development languages like XHTML, XML, CSS, PHP and Ajax.
>
On 2006/08/21 14:47, Marcos Marconcini wrote:
> I did an upgrade from 3.8 stable to 3.9 current ( I don't know if this is
> the problem )
>
> I followed the upgrade guide,
not quite - there's a bit about "upgrade to the most recent binary"
- install a snapshot. You probably don't need to build fr
Hello people,
I'm looking for the best ways to create a line of code beautification
(reformatting) scripts -- one for C, one for Ruby, one for Bash and
one for web development languages like XHTML, XML, CSS, PHP and Ajax.
Whether as frontline warriors or household maids, they would ensure
pro
On 8/24/06, Stephan A. Rickauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
People from time to time say they don't want to have a compiler
installed on a productive system due to security issues. I don't
understand this. Isn't is too late anyway, if someone's already able to
make use of the compiler?
I 'll st
Anton Karpov wrote:
2006/8/24, Stephan A. Rickauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
People from time to time say they don't want to have a compiler
installed on a productive system due to security issues. I don't
understand this. Isn't is too late anyway, if someone's already able to
make use of the compile
Hello.
ssh on a recent snapshot does not like trying gssapi-with-mic when there is no
ticket file.
I did not see any relevant patches in the CVS web.
Jan J
:; sysctl kern.version
kern.version=OpenBSD 4.0-beta (GENERIC) #1083: Mon Aug 21 21:24:02 MDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch
Ok I played around a bit and what I got so far is this.
A file or directory created by a common user can be access by root as it
should be. A file created by root can not read by a user even though the
permissions allow it (644). When I issue "chmod 644 file" as root, it
works. A directory cre
Hello list,
I'm having problem upgrading a 3.8 stable to 3.9 stable. The server is
a Prolian dl380 g2 with a LSI MegaRAID 320-1. When booting the
CD it stops right after ami driver is loaded:
ami0 at pci3 dev 4 function 0 "Symbios Logic MegaRAID" rev 0x01: irq 7
Under 3.8 it works great. I have
Hello,
I think that you can remove out obsolete holidays and put there our
current dates. Sorry, but references are in Polish language.
References
1.
http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narodowe_%C5%9Awi%C4%99to_Niepodleg%C5%82o%C5%9Bci
2. http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narodowe_%C5%9Awi%C4%99to_Odrodz
Packages are precompiled binary executable forms
of programs. They're typically located at
OpenBSD mirrors, and on the OpenBSD website.
http://www.openbsd.org/3.9_packages/
is one such location to start
finding packages for 3.9. If you're
running 3.8 or 3.7 just replace 3.9
with 3.8/3.7.
Ok I played around a bit and what I got so far is this.
A file or directory created by a common user can be access by root as it
should be. A file created by root can not read by a user even though the
permissions allow it (644). When I issue "chmod 644 file" as root, it
works. A directory cre
Hey,
Is OpenBSD vunerable to NetBSD Security Advisory 2006-019?
http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2006-019.txt.asc
FreeBSD seems to contain the same bugs and has issued advisory as well:
http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-06:18.ppp.asc
The FreeBSD patc
Even though I can mount the same encrypted folder with different users
and create files, and permissions are 644 or 755 it is not possible to
access files/folders created by other users, only own stuff.
Neither is it possible, even as the owner, to change the ownership of
files/folders inside the
2006/8/24, Stephan A. Rickauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> People from time to time say they don't want to have a compiler
> installed on a productive system due to security issues. I don't
> understand this. Isn't is too late anyway, if someone's already able to
> make use of the compiler?
>
> --
>
Well, given the prevalance of scripting languages and such, it seems
like a false sense of security.
And frankly, why can't the cracker that already knows what OS he's
working on, not just supply
a pre-compiled binary...
But whatever works for people.
Han Boetes wrote:
Tomas wrote:
Yes
Tomas wrote:
> Yes it's too late, but why to let a hacker to compile his exploits on
> your system and to go compromising other PCs (from your DMZ or from
> internet, it doesn't matter).
If a hacker is on your system, he'll also manage to install the compiler
himself before using it.
Stephan
[de
Tomas wrote:
> Yes it's too late, but why to let a hacker to compile his
> exploits on your system and to go compromising other PCs (from
> your DMZ or from internet, it doesn't matter).
Exactly, all compilers should be forbidden!
# Han
Yes it's too late, but why to let a hacker to compile his exploits on
your system and to go compromising other PCs (from your DMZ or from
internet, it doesn't matter).
Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
People from time to time say they don't want to have a compiler
installed on a productive system du
People from time to time say they don't want to have a compiler
installed on a productive system due to security issues. I don't
understand this. Isn't is too late anyway, if someone's already able to
make use of the compiler?
--
Stephan A. Rickauer
94 matches
Mail list logo
