On Nov 17, 2007 6:14 PM, David Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hiya.
>
> What is a convenient way for me to get the source for the man pages in
> current?
>
> Best wishes,
> David
>
>
Check out the source.
It depends on what man page you are looking for.
Man pages for different programs or dri
Lars Hansson wrote:
On Nov 17, 2007 8:35 AM, David Higgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I combined authpf with OpenVPN, using some big hints from some easily
google-able places. Even though WEP and WPA aren't supported by
OpenBSD,
OpenBSD supports WEP.
Does it even matter?
On Nov 17, 2007 8:35 AM, David Higgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I combined authpf with OpenVPN, using some big hints from some easily
> google-able places. Even though WEP and WPA aren't supported by
> OpenBSD,
OpenBSD supports WEP.
---
Lars Hansson
We have been trying to migrate from an Apache proxy balancer to hoststated
and have run into a couple issues, one of which a document and another I
will send along later.
We are using 4.2-stable:
OpenBSD mesh1 4.2 GENERIC.MP#1378 amd64
Our first issue is in getting load balancing to occur in a de
On 2007/11/19 05:04, Siju George wrote:
> One all the features in your mind has been implemented to softraid
> will it make RAIDFRAME redundant?
This is all future stuff, I think I'm right in saying that what's
needed first and foremost is test reports for the less popular
machine architectures.
On Nov 18, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Siju George wrote:
I know I cannot escape recompiling the kernel because it is necessary
for updates. But as far as possible I would like to stay away from it
on production machines :-)
That's what releases are for.
Thanks a million for all the detailed answer
On Nov 18, 2007 7:46 PM, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 04:32:58AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> > Thank you so much
> >
>
> Most of your questions are around rebuild or derivatives. This does not
> exist yet. My current push is to get softraid working on all a
Thanks Calomel,
I'll try to get some of these, which I have in another server.
When I have it done, I'll report.
Kind regards,
On Nov 16, 2007 2:57 PM, Calomel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fernando,
>
> Doing a quick google search I see other people have also reported problems
> with the on bo
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 06:52:16PM +0100, Mic J wrote:
> #!/bin/sh -
>
> or
>
> #!/bin/ksh -
>
>
> But are there any places in the man page i can find this?
>
> something about it, maybe, at ~26% in man sh(in the section: Search
> and Execution).
Or execve(2).
-Otto
#!/bin/sh -
or
#!/bin/ksh -
But are there any places in the man page i can find this?
something about it, maybe, at ~26% in man sh(in the section: Search
and Execution).
regards cognacc
OpenCON, the only conference dedicated to OpenBSD only, will take place
on the first weekend of december in Venice/Italy.
Since a few days the schedule is online. It will be a very interesting
conference with an attractive programme again.
And with the OpenSSH birthday party on Saturday it is
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 04:32:58AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2007 12:04 AM, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll take this as the documentation isn't good enough. Can you point me
> > to the area that isn't clear?
> >
>
> Thanks for the offer Marco.
> I currently use R
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:21:58PM +0200, Lars Nood??n wrote:
> What is the reason that kern.maxproc is set to 532?
> What is the tradeoff from increasing it?
>
> I'm looking at dealing with an error "/bsd: proc: table is full" on an
> OpenBSD 4.2 STABLE x86 host, with the GENERIC kernel. Guessin
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 02:45:22PM -0800, Lord Sporkton wrote:
> I have ospf running between OpenBSD 4.2 GENERIC.MP#304 i386 and a 1721
> Cisco running c1700-k9o3sy7-mz.123-23.bin. "ospfctl show fib ospf"
> shows 2 networks, the loopbacks and the gre link however "ospfctl show
> database area 0.0.0
What is the reason that kern.maxproc is set to 532?
What is the tradeoff from increasing it?
I'm looking at dealing with an error "/bsd: proc: table is full" on an
OpenBSD 4.2 STABLE x86 host, with the GENERIC kernel. Guessing from the
archives on this and other lists, it seems a workaround to de
Il giorno 17/nov/07, alle 20:02, Henning Brauer ha scritto:
* Francesco Toscan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-17 19:22]:
I use ifstated to detect link changes and restart ntpd.
bad idea. loses all state.
just give it a little slack, it copes.
Have still to try on 4.2, but on 4.0 I ended up wit
On Nov 18, 2007 2:34 AM, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/17/07, Die Gestalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to be explained why you have to do all these steps to encrypt
> > a partition. Isn't it possible to have some sort of filter driver that
> > simply ciphers and decipher
Please send this message to your friends if you want to know some
information about islam you can go to
http://www.amrkhaled.net/acategories/categories24.html
18 matches
Mail list logo
