The speedstep diff from Gordon solved it
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=121493180205892&w=2
$ diff -u dmesg.GENERIC dmesg.est
--- dmesg.GENERIC Tue Jul 22 12:08:34 2008
+++ dmesg.est Tue Jul 22 11:59:51 2008
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-OpenBSD 4.4-beta (GENERIC) #1: Mon Jul 21 20:21:23 CEST 2
So sad the software icons like him need to use such an offensive way
of expressing simple ideas, I hope his destructive way of arguing
doesn't _encourage_the_wrong_behavior_ on more people.
2008/7/20 Sean Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> We need a Button.
>
>
>
> Reminds me of the advert in Comic
Howdy List?
Following is a modification of the ruleset at
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html .
It works to allow routing of client services service_ports on an internal
network onto one external gateway while other services from the internal
network default to another path.
This works wi
> > From: Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.3 FAQ in PDF?
> >
> > It looks like it doesn't exist right now. Why
> don't
> > you just download
> > all the FAQ pages?
> > for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do
> > ftp http://openbsd.org/faq/faq0${i}.html
> > done
> > for i in 10
Currently i am trying to limit the bandwidth of one computer .113,
however there is almost nothing matching and going into the queue.
.113 is currently running BT, chat messengers, and a multiple of web
browsing instances
right now my rules are not as pretty as they might otherwise be, i am
trying
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Joel Dinel wrote:
> > To answer my own question, no sooner had I hit 'send' than I noticed the
> > patch number indicated 4.3. I have downloaded OpenSSH 5.0, the
> > appropriate 4.1 -> 5.0 patch and all is well.
>
> Well I am getting the exact same compilation error as you,
--- On Tue, 7/22/08, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.3 FAQ in PDF?
>
> It looks like it doesn't exist right now. Why don't
> you just download
> all the FAQ pages?
> for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do
> ftp http://openbsd.o
> To answer my own question, no sooner had I hit 'send' than I noticed the
> patch number indicated 4.3. I have downloaded OpenSSH 5.0, the
> appropriate 4.1 -> 5.0 patch and all is well.
Well I am getting the exact same compilation error as you, on a fresh
OpenBSD 4.3 box, when tying to compile
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:12 PM, The Foxes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I've compiled the latest openSSL with the ZLIB option (I think that it
> is included by default anyway). That made no difference.
Are you sure you linked stunnel against the libssl *and* the libcrypto
from that? Remember
2008/7/22 Vladislav Stoyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I would like to buy a pair of 1000BaseSX cards up to 200EUR each from Germany
> for an OpenBSD-based gateway.
[..]
>
> Any ideas and recommendations on these or any other cards available for
> purchase within Germany are more than welcome!
Hi V
K.R. (Randy) Lewis,
We were able to confirm (today) that it is the /MP kernel that has the issue
defined below. The single CPU build ran the huge file copy just fine.
R
> Re-post in misc@ (sorry for posting wrongly before)
> -
>
> Encountered the following: 4.3 i386 MP kernel w/
On Tuesday 22 July 2008, Charlie Farinella wrote:
> I have been asked to upgrade OpenSSH on an OpenBSD 4.1 server from 4.6
> to 5.1. I have followed the instructions at
> http://www.openssh.org/openbsd.html and am getting the error below
> during 'make'. I have downloaded the source and the pa
> Hi,
>
> > Is there an easy way to tell if zlib has been compiled into openSSL and
> > is working?
> >
> > At this point I still don't know where the problem lies.
>
> Sorry if my question is silly, but:
>
> a) are you running stunnel in chroot?
> b) have you tried running 'ldd'? (might miss so
I have been asked to upgrade OpenSSH on an OpenBSD 4.1 server from 4.6
to 5.1. I have followed the instructions at
http://www.openssh.org/openbsd.html and am getting the error below
during 'make'. I have downloaded the source and the patch as
instructed and followed these instructions to the
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nuno MagalhC#es escreveu:
>>> It was yes, became no, still doesn't work. So far all of your
>>> suggestions amounted to nothing useful, much like your rants but hey,
>>> if the Theo guy can act like an ass i gues
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nuno MagalhC#es escreveu:
>> It was yes, became no, still doesn't work. So far all of your
>> suggestions amounted to nothing useful, much like your rants but hey,
>> if the Theo guy can act like an ass i guess you ca
I hope it isn't bad form to reply to my own message, but I still can't
get this working and would love some help...
So far I've followed the learning curve and recompiled my OBSD to
-stable. That didn't help, although it didn't hurt either.
I've compiled the latest openSSL with the ZLIB option (I
Dear *,
I would like to buy a pair of 1000BaseSX cards up to 200EUR each from Germany
for an OpenBSD-based gateway.
Does anybody have experience or tips on Allied Telesis' Broadcom BCM5703S-based
AT-2916SX and AT-2931SX or the Marvell 88E8022-based AT-2971SX /all priced
around 90EUR/ ?
I see {
Nuno MagalhC#es escreveu:
> It was yes, became no, still doesn't work. So far all of your
> suggestions amounted to nothing useful, much like your rants but hey,
> if the Theo guy can act like an ass i guess you can too, i mean, he's
> the boss and all...
>
> In the meantime, i'll do something usef
> I don't think this actually accomplishes much. It still lets poisoned
> replies back in on the previous port number.
hm... I don't think it does. BIND would, but it's going through PF.
Without an additional rule to pass in to user named, the UDP reply has to
be to the new NATed port. That's the
Dear *,
I would like to buy a pair of 1000BaseSX cards up to 200EUR each from Germany
for an OpenBSD-based gateway.
Does anybody have experience or tips on Allied Telesis' Broadcom BCM5703S-based
AT-2916SX and AT-2931SX or the Marvell 88E8022-based AT-2971SX /all priced
around 90EUR/ ?
I see {
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:04:17PM -0400, Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
> > debug1: Sending command: scp -v -r -t ~
> > 6:52PM up 4 days, 56 mins, 0 marksandmans, load averages: 0.11, 0.09, 0.08
>
> Am I the only one noting this line in the output. I don't think scp
> wants to have load averages. It
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> jot(1) helps.
>
> $ jot 15 1
> 1
> 2
> 3
> 4
> 5
> 6
> 7
> 8
> 9
> 10
> 11
> 12
> 13
> 14
> 15
> $ jot -w%02d 15 1
> 01
> 02
> 03
> 04
> 05
> 06
> 07
> 08
> 09
> 10
> 11
> 12
> 13
> 14
> 15
> $
>
> Kind regards,
OpenBSD 4.4.-beta i386 (dmesg at the bottom)
This is the same system that I reported a bsd.mp panic on last night.
Sometime over night the single processor generic bsd kernel panicked as
well. As you'll see below, when I got my trace and ps I entered a boot
reboot at the ddb prompt. The sy
Hi!
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 09:32:15AM -0500, Daniel A. Ramaley wrote:
>On Tuesday July 22 2008 09:04, you wrote:
>>> for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do
>>> ftp http://openbsd.org/faq/faq0${i}.html
>>> done
>>> for i in 10 11 12 13 14 15; do
>>> ftp http://openbsd.org/faq/faq${i}.html
>>> done
>>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 09:32:15AM -0500, Daniel A. Ramaley wrote:
> The number list could be collapsed into `seq 1 15` on a system
> with seq installed.
Have you met jot(1)?
--
o--{ Will Maier }--o
| web:...http://www.lfod.us/ | [EMAIL PROTEC
I'll just skip the part where you egotrip.
> Check if you have this line:
>
>GSSAPIAuthentication yes
>
> If it is yes (which isn't the ssh default), change it to no, then try again.
It was yes, became no, still doesn't work. So far all of your
suggestions amounted to nothing useful, much lik
> Note that the 2 loops are not the same. You'd need:
>
> for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15; do
> ftp http://openbsd.org/faq/faq`printf %02d $i`.html
> done
No you don't. Check the actual files. It's faq1.html to faq15.html
> The number list could be collapsed into `seq 1 15` on
> > Wouldn't it be simpler to be done in one loop?
> Oh, yes it would. I was thinking about fixed width fields. I have so
> many nightmares about them and shell scripts since I don't know how to
> deal with them there that I didn't notice the FAQ isn't numbered with
> them.
>
Tell me about it. ;-)
I recently configured urxvt to use an Xft font, specifically
LucidaTypewriter. I noticed after doing so that font rendering is
extremely slow -- Page-Down'ing a manpage takes 25% of the CPU,
whereas using the Fixed font uses 0% of the CPU. Also, when conky is
configured to use an Xft font, it uses
On Tuesday July 22 2008 09:04, you wrote:
>> for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do
>> ftp http://openbsd.org/faq/faq0${i}.html
>> done
>> for i in 10 11 12 13 14 15; do
>> ftp http://openbsd.org/faq/faq${i}.html
>> done
>
>Wouldn't it be simpler to be done in one loop?
>
>for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
> It looks like it doesn't exist right now. Why don't you just download
> all the FAQ pages?
> for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do
> ftp http://openbsd.org/faq/faq0${i}.html
> done
> for i in 10 11 12 13 14 15; do
> ftp http://openbsd.org/faq/faq${i}.html
> done
Wouldn't it be simpler to be done i
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:18 AM, my mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i don't have 24 hours connection at home, and want read FAQ OpenBSD 4.3 in
> PDF format.
>
> in this address i can read 4.3 FAQ http://openbsd.org/faq/index.html
> but when i try to download from pub/OpenBSD/doc at FTP mirrors,
Nuno MagalhC#es escreveu:
>> Your DNS is setup wrong.
>>
> Too vague.
>
>
>> Try setting "UseDNS no" on the server in /etc/ssh/sshd_config.
>>
> That solved the slowness, thanks. I tried -HUP ing the sshd processes
> but that didn't solve it at once (it only killed my connections fo
>
hello,
https://tiifp.org/landisk.html
maybe this helps.
thomas
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 03:43:34PM +0200, Joel CARNAT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a serial console on my Plextor PX-EH40L which seems to be broken
> now (no RX available). After quite a few testings of various OSes, the
> disk is no
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:53:23AM -0600, Daniel Melameth wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Joe Warren-Meeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The default limit for number of states is quite low. Try adding the
> > following to pf.conf and running pfctl -vf /etc/pf.conf
> > "
> > set limit {
Hi,
sometimes I get this on my SUN Fire v440 when there is some traffic:
cas0: status=7889090
cas0 stops working then. Using "ifconfig cas0 down/up" only helps for a
very short time. Only way to get it to work again for some time is a
full reboot.
This is using the latest snapshot:
consol
* Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008-07-19, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Remember that the ALIX.2/3 boards usually do not have a battery
> > to backup a realtime clock.
>
> 3c3 does. I think it's basically all the ones with a VGA bios.
Yes. the 1b, 1c, and 3c3
On 2008-07-22, Duncan Patton a Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:04:59 -0600
> Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > These are both local machines, why would DNS be required?
>>
>> Because in the modern world DNS -- or any other kind of reliable
>> name->addres
On 2008-07-19, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remember that the ALIX.2/3 boards usually do not have a battery
> to backup a realtime clock.
3c3 does. I think it's basically all the ones with a VGA bios.
Hai,
Sorry to bother you again, however doing
ntpd -s
I got
# tail -f /var/log/daemon
Jul 21 15:04:29 pceng4 ntpd[8943]: listening on 192.168.1.200
Jul 21 15:04:29 pceng4 ntpd[8943]: listening on fe80:1::20d:b9ff:fe14:ef48
Jul 21 15:04:29 pceng4 ntpd[8943]: listening on 192.168.10.200
Jul 21 15
My Dell Latitude D600 seems to be reporting wrong cpu-speed. The dmesg
says
acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3, C3, C2, C1, FVS, 1600, 1600, 1400, 1200, 1000,
800, 600 M
Hz
which I believe to be correct. But this is what I get from sysctl
hw.cpuspeed=600
hw.setperf=100
Changing hw.setperf makes no differenc
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:04:59 -0600
Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > These are both local machines, why would DNS be required?
>
> Because in the modern world DNS -- or any other kind of reliable
> name->address + address->name mapping -- is required.
>
> You might as well get used to
i don't have 24 hours connection at home, and want read FAQ OpenBSD 4.3 in PDF
format.
in this address i can read 4.3 FAQ http://openbsd.org/faq/index.html
but when i try to download from pub/OpenBSD/doc at FTP mirrors, this FAQ for
4.2 version not for 4.3
where i can download 4.3 FAQ in PDF fo
Hi,
Maxim Belooussov wrote:
Hi all,
Lenovo X300, snapshot for i386, from 20080717 (also 20080716) dumps
into dbb on boot on uvideo:
uvm_fault(0xd0814b20, 0x0, 0, 1) -> e
kernel: page fault trap, code=0
Stopped at uvideo_vs_negotiation+0x81: mov10x15(%eax),%eax
ddb{0}>
//no console
45 matches
Mail list logo
