there is no wonder its an "ensteinium dinosaur"
piece of hardware travels a lot an sometimes ends up in
486, p1 or p111, i had to backup this biggy in a fly,
and since the kernel was supporting it, but while the bios was
bewildered i was able to make the copy,
some suggested the raw device , nex
Hi all,
I have a question concerning some differences in pf rules diplay with
regards to pfctl, pftop, and systat (using a 4.4 snapshot downloaded
today).
My scrub, NAT and filter sections in my 'pf.conf' look like this:
scrub on $wan_if random-id reassemble tcp
nat on $wan_if from !($wan_if) -
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:52:42 -0600, Jeff Ross wrote:
>jared r r spiegel wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 08:30:22AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>> In any event, it's definitely not all that unusual...
>>
>> seconded.
>>
>> the closest i've come to being able to deal with this is
>> hav
On 2008-08-30, Girish Venkatachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But this is not how the gmails of this internet currently work. At
>> this point in time, that means either whitelisting those senders you
>> deem a) trustworthy enough to not send you spam and b) important
>> enough to whitelist in
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Girish Venkatachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
You must be aware that google and other such popular mail services like
yahoo!, hotmail etc. blatantly flout RFC2821 and retry mails from a bank
of mail servers.
A large part of the problem is that while RFC2821 stat
I've been poking around the Misc archives, and haven't seen anything
related to solving this specific issue, at least with my own preferred
router software: OpenBSD.
So, while researching on implementation details for a community
wireless system, I found out about Hazy-Sighted Link State Ro
make search key=p5-www-curl
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
I'm trying to get hold of CPAN's WWW::Curl:Easy, which might be in
ports, on 4.4-current (snapshot from 29 august).
make search=p5-www-curl (or any other search) in ports hangs with the
following error:
===> Checking files for freeze-2.5
>> fr
I'm trying to get hold of CPAN's WWW::Curl:Easy, which might be in
ports, on 4.4-current (snapshot from 29 august).
make search=p5-www-curl (or any other search) in ports hangs with the
following error:
===> Checking files for freeze-2.5
>> freeze-2.5.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this syste
jared r r spiegel wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 08:30:22AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
In any event, it's definitely not all that unusual...
seconded.
the closest i've come to being able to deal with this is
having written a script who performs SPF lookups on the
domain in questio
Girish Venkatachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is news to me that the RFC does not actually mandate retries from
> the same IP address as Peter M Hansteen wrote.
The way the RFC is written, it is almost as if it was a natural
assumption by the RFC writers that retries would happen from the
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 08:30:22AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> In any event, it's definitely not all that unusual...
seconded.
the closest i've come to being able to deal with this is
having written a script who performs SPF lookups on the
domain in question (eg, will recurse up t
On 14:10:04 Aug 30, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> |
> | Does the last sentence of the first paragraph above suggest this?
>
> The section you quoted refers to receiving, not sending mail (more
> specifically, to source routing e-mail).
>
Oh!
> Can you point these out ? I've read the RFC and couldn't
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 03:48:54PM +0100, Simon Connah wrote:
>>> I've just been trying to install the SWI-Prolog port and it seems
>>> like it
>>> needs X11 installed to run. Is there a command line version of Prolog
>>> floating around at all? Or do I need to compile and install my own
>>> co
Hi,
Thank you for your reply.
> You must be aware that google and other such popular mail services like
> yahoo!, hotmail etc. blatantly flout RFC2821 and retry mails from a bank
> of mail servers.
Notice that it is not a matter of spamd trapping the google host. The
greyscanner script is trappi
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 04:56:03PM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
| On 16:44:19 Aug 30, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
| > > I couldn't find this mentioned in RFC2821, could you point out the
| > > section number which talks about this?
| > >
| > > In any event, it's definitely not all that unusu
Hello.
I use OpenBSD 4.3 on DMP Electronics eBox-2300.
http://www.compactpc.com.tw/ebox-2300.htm
However, I'm not trying X11 on this PC.
2008/8/29 xiaoheng ling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I wanna buy a Vortex86 platform machine.
> The official website is:http://www.vortex86.com/index2.html
> Does a
On Friday 29 August 2008 16:30:21 John Nietzsche wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> i have configured my openbsd kerberos server. It is serving two other
> computer in my home network. One of this client is running openbsd the
> other is Windows XP.
>
> I am able to login into any of these 2 client and authent
On 16:44:19 Aug 30, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> > I couldn't find this mentioned in RFC2821, could you point out the
> > section number which talks about this?
> >
> > In any event, it's definitely not all that unusual...
> >
>
> Obviously then I must be wrong.
>
> Mail servers are supposed t
On 16:44:19 Aug 30, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> > I couldn't find this mentioned in RFC2821, could you point out the
> > section number which talks about this?
> >
> > In any event, it's definitely not all that unusual...
> >
>
> Obviously then I must be wrong.
>
> Mail servers are supposed t
John Nietzsche wrote:
Hi folks,
i have configured my openbsd kerberos server. It is serving two other
computer in my home network. One of this client is running openbsd the
other is Windows XP.
I am able to login into any of these 2 client and authentication goes
through kerberos 100% successfu
Girish Venkatachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You must be aware that google and other such popular mail services like
> yahoo!, hotmail etc. blatantly flout RFC2821 and retry mails from a bank
> of mail servers.
A large part of the problem is that while RFC2821 states that the
sender MUST re
On 08:30:22 Aug 30, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2008-08-30, Girish Venkatachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You must be aware that google and other such popular mail services like
> > yahoo!, hotmail etc. blatantly flout RFC2821 and retry mails from a bank
> > of mail servers.
>
> I couldn't
On 2008-08-30, Girish Venkatachalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You must be aware that google and other such popular mail services like
> yahoo!, hotmail etc. blatantly flout RFC2821 and retry mails from a bank
> of mail servers.
I couldn't find this mentioned in RFC2821, could you point out the
23 matches
Mail list logo
