On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Brian Keefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I booted a Sunfire V120 off a 4.4 snapshot CD and dd if=/dev/zero
of=/rsd0
was humming along quite nicely when I left this evening.
You may want to go back and fix both
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Brian Keefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I booted a Sunfire V120 off a 4.4 snapshot CD and dd if=/dev/zero of=/rsd0
> was humming along quite nicely when I left this evening.
You may want to go back and fix both your typos.
On Sep 20, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Sunnz wrote:
OK I am trying to completely erase the data of a hard disk so I though
I can just do `dd if=/dev/arandom of=/dev/rwd0c` as to my
understanding that is the entire hard disk (slice c) of wd0 in 'raw'
mode?
But that dd refuse to do it.
This is running of
Thanks a lot guys, I seem to have resolved the problem. So in short
it seems like the netopia 30xx series router was doing some funky
thing with packets which PF was rightfully rejecting (as they were not
normalized). This is just my theory. Once I converted my openbsd box
to the router
To:
HR Manager
C/O the General Manager
(%COMPANY NAME%)
Tel: (%TELE%) Fax: (%FAX%)
(%LOCATION%) (%P.O.BOX%)
E-mail: misc@openbsd.org
(%WEBSITE%)
Dear Respected
Further to your International & Local recruitment plan; Arabian Centers the
Largest Recruitment Group in the region is the
Thanks but i need to do that by myself.
As I Told u, I had those rules working on old versions.
# tcpdump -n -e -ttt -i pflog0
tcpdump: listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG
Sep 23 19:19:23.465003 rule 0/(match) rdr in on xl1: 189.84.171.36.1439 >
10.10.100.21.8101: [|tcp] (DF)
Sep 23 19:20:04.0791
On 2008-09-23, Ricardo Augusto de Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No one can help me on this?
> I have just one hour to finish this 'job'.
Maybe someone from http://www.openbsd.org/support.html#Brazil
> Help me please folks, I need this rdr working TODAY.
Sorry, free voluntary support doesn't
Yes i am sure.
I am connected to internet using openbsd as geteway.
-Mensagem original-
De: Mark Rolen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: terga-feira, 23 de setembro de 2008 18:42
Para: misc@openbsd.org; Ricardo Augusto de Souza
Assunto: Re: RES: PF cannot RDR connections
Ricardo Augu
Ricardo Augusto de Souza wrote:
Last tests:
# tcpdump -i xl1 'port 8101'
tcpdump: listening on xl1, link-type EN10MB
18:20:52.383277 200217182188.user.veloxzone.com.br.49793 >
smtp.cmtsp.com.br.8101: S 2769173131:2769173131(0) win 8192 (DF)
WHAT IS WRONG WITH MY RDR NOW?
Dumb quest
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:23:25 +0200
Jonathan Schleifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 22.09.2008 um 13:45 schrieb Gabri Mati:
>
> > Dear List,
> > I'd like to study the assembly language of the x86 architecture. I've
> > searched for books, but there are a lot of them. Could you please
> > recomm
Last tests:
# tcpdump -i xl1 'port 8101'
tcpdump: listening on xl1, link-type EN10MB
18:20:52.383277 200217182188.user.veloxzone.com.br.49793 >
smtp.cmtsp.com.br.8101: S 2769173131:2769173131(0) win 8192 (DF)
18:20:55.417702 200217182188.user.veloxzone.com.br.49793 >
smtp.cmtsp.com.br.8101: S 27
I have to links to the internet.
I am testing it from other link and It4s not working.
As I told before, I had this rules working on oldest version of openBSD ( not
in the same hardware ).
Now my boss told me to replace openBSD cause I cant do a single rdr that
worked in the past.
That sucks.
-
If that's the case the original poster should take a look:
http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html#reflect
I've had to solve similar problems by NAT'ing the internal network(s) to
the firewalls internal interface IP so that traffic hitting the internal
server appears to come from the firewall itself
I tryied to do this rdr Just to test.
Here is was I really need then:
# pfctl -sn
nat on xl1 inet from 10.10.0.0/16 to any -> 200.162.41.34
rdr pass on xl1 inet proto tcp from any to (xl1) port = 8101 -> 10.10.100.21
port 8101
#
So? Its not the problem as u related.
-Mensagem original--
Your problem, as I stated off list, is that you are rdr to and from hosts on
the same subnet.
These are all 10.10/16 addresses.
10.10.100.254 is an address on the firewall
Here's what's happening.
10.10.0.135.4552 -> 10.10.100.254.81
Which get's switched to
10.10.0.135.4552 -> 10.10.0.2.81
Then
No one can help me on this?
I have just one hour to finish this 'job'.
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Ricardo
Augusto de Souza
Enviada em: terga-feira, 23 de setembro de 2008 16:21
Para: misc@openbsd.org
Assunto: RES: PF cannot RDR connection
I am lost.
Nat is working but I cant do any single rdr.
Any clue?
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de
Ricardo
Augusto de Souza
Enviada em: terga-feira, 23 de setembro de 2008 13:31
Para: misc@openbsd.org
Assunto: RES: PF cannot RDR connections
I
2008/9/23 guede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ropers wrote:
>>
>> Lots of interesting stuff there: http://www.phiral.net/
>> Especially the last link on that page. I thought I'd never see that
>> again, as it's vanished from the Web virtually everywhere else.
>
>
> ???
>
> Hasn't vanished at all.
Sorry,
ropers wrote:
Lots of interesting stuff there: http://www.phiral.net/
Especially the last link on that page. I thought I'd never see that
again, as it's vanished from the Web virtually everywhere else.
???
Hasn't vanished at all.
# tcpdump
tcpdump: Failed to open bpf device for xl0: No such file or directory
# sync
#
PFFF
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Ricardo
Augusto de Souza
Enviada em: terga-feira, 23 de setembro de 2008 13:31
Para: misc@openbs
I already tryied the -current ports and I got the same error.
Please send me the patch you used.
-Mensagem original-
De: Giancarlo Razzolini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Giancarlo
Razzolini
Enviada em: terga-feira, 23 de setembro de 2008 14:34
Para: Ricardo Augusto de Souza
Cc:
Ricardo Augusto de Souza escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> I got some errors trying to compile squid with ldap auth on openbsd 4.3.
>
> I used squid from ports and compiled its source and I got same error
> when I add "--enable-auth="basic digest LDAP" \ and
> --enable-basic-auth-helpers="NCSA YP LDAP" \ to ./
Am 22.09.2008 um 13:45 schrieb Gabri Mati:
> Dear List,
> I'd like to study the assembly language of the x86 architecture. I've
> searched for books, but there are a lot of them. Could you please
> recommend
> me a good writer/book about this topic?
>
> Thank You!
Google for 386INTEL.TXT and 387I
I have done this already for the sake of troubleshooting. I have
tried removing BLOCKs , I have tried removing anti-spoof ,
I have tried re-writing the redirector by putting "pass" but for some
reason PF doesn't seem to like packets coming from some DSL links. I
have also tried various scru
I was monitoring tcpdump -i xl0, disabled pf and I try to access
http://10.10.100.254:81 and I saw this:
13:30:38.976708 10.10.100.254.81 > 10.10.0.135.2321: R 0:0(0) ack 1 win 0
(DF)
13:30:40.007811 802.1d RSTP config flags=7c
role=DESIGNATED root=8000.0:f:cb:56:80:a0 rootcost=20004
bridge=8000.0
Still the same error.
Making all in LDAP
if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I/usr/ports/www/squid/w-squid-2.7.STABLE3/squid-2.7.STABLE3/helpers/basic_au
th/LDAP -I../../../include
-I/usr/ports/www/squid/w-squid-2.7.STABLE3/squid-2.7.STABLE3/include -O2
-pipe -D_REENTRANT -MT squid_ldap_auth.o -MD -MP
I was used to do this easily but it4s failing now.
Xl0 = 10.10.100.254
Xl1=internet
This is my /etc/pf.conf
# interface externa WAN
ext_if="xl1"
# interface interna LAN
int_if="xl0"
#set skip on lo
#scrub in
rdr on xl1 proto tcp from any to xl1 port 8101 -> 10.10.100.21 port 8101
r
On 2008-09-23, Ricardo Augusto de Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got some errors trying to compile squid with ldap auth on openbsd 4.3.
>
> I used squid from ports and compiled its source and I got same error
> when I add "--enable-auth="basic digest LDAP" \ and
> --enable-basic-auth-helper
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Wim Vandeputte wrote:
Liantec (and Comell) is a company tricky to deal with, they are shipping
boards but you need to order large quantities. They don't seem to have
a very solid distributor network. My last order took about 4 months to
get a hold off...
I know of two dist
Pete Vickers wrote:
1. create a layer 2 (switched) ring, using spanning tree.
- completely independent of openbsd box
2. connect your (dual NIC) openbsd box to 2 separate switches for
redundancy, and add both NICs to a trunk group.
- redundancy of switch, cabling and NICs.
Pete,
thanks for
2008/9/21 Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is running off a OpenBSD 4.3 CD, there are no intention to
> actually destroy the hard disk in any way, just erasing the data off
> the hard disk so that it can be reused, re-sold, whatever. The data
> are not some military top secret, but it is interesti
1. create a layer 2 (switched) ring, using spanning tree.
- completely independent of openbsd box
2. connect your (dual NIC) openbsd box to 2 separate switches for
redundancy, and add both NICs to a trunk group.
- redundancy of switch, cabling and NICs.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
Hi,
I got some errors trying to compile squid with ldap auth on openbsd 4.3.
I used squid from ports and compiled its source and I got same error
when I add "--enable-auth="basic digest LDAP" \ and
--enable-basic-auth-helpers="NCSA YP LDAP" \ to ./configure.
Note I have already installed Ope
2008/9/23 Brynet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I found this article to be exceptionally useful when using OpenBSD as a
> primary development platform:
>
> http://www.phiral.net/openbsdasm.htm
Lots of interesting stuff there: http://www.phiral.net/
Especially the last link on that page. I thought I'd neve
Thank You!
Althought i'm a total beginner with assembly, but these will come in handy
when i'll get the picture.
2008/9/23 Brynet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I found this article to be exceptionally useful when using OpenBSD as a
> primary development platform:
>
> http://www.phiral.net/openbsdasm.ht
hey,
> On Sep 17, 2008, at 12:49 AM, Aaron Stellman wrote:
> > This commell site is suspiciously similar to Liantec site; moreover,
> > this commell device is very similar to EMB-5740 Liantec.
> > I assume these two companies are owned by same individuals.
> > I still can't find any places in US t
Dnia wtorek, 23 wrze6nia 2008 01:20, Don Jackson napisa3:
> If so, it seems that the only remaining module I would need is
> mod_proxy_html. Do I need to recompile httpd to get this this into the
> build? (if so, how?) Or can I create a .so and just load it?
I think mod_prox_html is non-standard
I found this article to be exceptionally useful when using OpenBSD as a
primary development platform:
http://www.phiral.net/openbsdasm.htm
Hope that helps, the first few paragraphs of it anyway... :)
P.S: Both Intel and AMD have documentation available, they might be a
better start:
http://
Hi,
On Sun, 21.09.2008 at 16:04:11 +0200, Mariusz Makowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> a.a.a.a_net b.b.b.b_public_ip --- c.c.c.c_public_ip d.d.d.d_net
>
> What i wan't to achiev is: - comunication from a.a.a.a_net to d.d.d.d_net
> -- isakmpd.conf --
> [General]
> Listen-on= b.
Comments are inline.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:00:58PM -0700, Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
> I have users that can access the website fine (75.44.229.18) and some
> user that complain they can't access it. I don't know what gives. I
> have asked on the list for help but haven't still resolved th
40 matches
Mail list logo
