I use this in my /etc/rc.local
if [ -x /usr/libexec/spamd-setup ]; then
echo -n ' spamd-setup'; /usr/libexec/spamd-setup -b -D
fi
Nils
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of Nancy Ketelaars-Marijnissen
Sent: maandag 11 mei
Who was complaining? There's a difference between suggesting a good
design, such as qmail's and complaining.
So what you mean, is that when developing software we should look at
what already exists and try to do things right by learning from the
strength and weaknesses of other projects.
Hi.
I have VPN connection between 2 offices with subnets 192.168.1.0/24 and
192.168.2.0/24. I can ping 192.168.2.2 from 192.168.1.66 and vice versa. But
when I try to open shared directory (e.g., \\192.168.2.2\Shared from
192.168.1.66 and vice versa) I get error message, but I can easily open
On 11 May 2009, at 22:40, Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 03:24:15PM -0500, James wrote:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
HTMLHEAD
META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=unicode
META content=MSHTML 6.00.6001.18226 name=GENERATOR/HEAD
Dan a icrit :
Henning Brauer(lists-open...@bsws.de)@2009.05.11 19:45:57 +0200:
* Felipe Alfaro Solana felipe.alf...@gmail.com [2009-05-10 13:58]:
Hi misc,
May I ask what's the reason behind having sendmail be the default MTA
in OpenBSD? Why not switching to something that is easier to
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
you don't sound like a complete moron giving advices about a software that
you
don't even use ...
+1 !
Steph (aka FRbsd)
* Dan d...@ourbrains.org [2009-05-11 22:24]:
Henning Brauer(lists-open...@bsws.de)@2009.05.11 19:45:57 +0200:
* Felipe Alfaro Solana felipe.alf...@gmail.com [2009-05-10 13:58]:
Hi misc,
May I ask what's the reason behind having sendmail be the default MTA
in OpenBSD? Why not
* Johan Beisser j...@caustic.org [2009-05-12 01:30]:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Dan d...@ourbrains.org wrote:
So it seems like the goal is for it to be as good or better than qmail
if it's going to be smaller, easier to maintain, secure, etc. Then
where's the problem?
Saying qmail
Hello!
I've recently started playing around with the softraid(4) driver, as I
recently noticed that bsd.rd already comes with support for it. What I
want to accomplish is to place as much as possible into the RAID set
(RAID 1, of course), ideally (almost) booting from it.
Up until now I have
Hello!
I would like to set up traffic shape on OpenBSD for my clients, i have
many /30 networks and i need to shape all networks with some queue lets
say 5mbit for example(async on some cases) , but the thing is i need
queue/filter per network in that case(or even two if its async), and
that will
I went through a massive tonne of pain trying to set up two 1TB hard drives
in mirrored RAID with data and OS. I eventually found out my hardware just
wouldn't work with OpenBSD and RAID but trying on a different machine of
VMware and it worked. Check the archives for mine journey and everyone's
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Stefan Unterweger
stefan+open...@rg-me.it wrote:
I've recently started playing around with the softraid(4) driver, as I
recently noticed that bsd.rd already comes with support for it. What I
want to accomplish is to place as much as possible into the RAID set
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:47:32PM +0200, Stefan Unterweger wrote:
Hello!
I've recently started playing around with the softraid(4) driver, as I
recently noticed that bsd.rd already comes with support for it. What I
want to accomplish is to place as much as possible into the RAID set
(RAID
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Dan d...@ourbrains.org wrote:
Daniel Ouellet(dan...@presscom.net)@2009.05.11 18:08:02 -0400:
This new smtpd better be at least as good as qmail, otherwise - what's
the point?
For fun and learning dammit. It's been explain on undeadly before and in
the list.
Yes. I think I posted this here before, but since I'm lazy at searching
the archives too, here is what I did (Using a recompiled kernel with
sys/altq/altq_hfsc.h set to support #define HFSC_MAX_CLASSES 512 and
multiple external uplinks)
# cu** is the upload queue
# cd** is the download queue
...
Check for large packets, specifically UDP and port 88. Test by seeing
how big of pings you can get through using the -l option (assuming
you're pinging from the XP host.)
-Steve S.
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of
Yuriy A.
Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
It works fine for me through squid, so it looks like whatever proxy
it is you have to use doesn't like the doubled /.
squid, but for IPv6 mod_proxy.
Please try this diff. You can apply it in /usr/libdata/perl5/OpenBSD
(or in the src directory
Today i buy wifi card D-Link G650+ (PCMCIA) in hope to work at home with
Windows-powered box in ad-hoc mode.
Case bwi(4) in my notebook do not have support IBSS mode.
People in internet sad that some revisions of this card had Atheros chips.
This one (rev B1) has TI chip, so it must work with
ICMP packets with size 32 ... 63600 bytes comes with 0% of loses. Large
packets ( 63600 bytes) have 25...75% of loses.
- Original Message -
From: Steven Surdock ssurd...@engineered-net.com
To: Yuriy A. Dmitrishin dim3d...@art-fm.com.ua; misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Hi!
I've got a usb ethernet adapter which basically works but
needs to be set into promiscuous mode if the mac address
is changed.
The adapter is correctly found under OpenBSD 4.4 (GENERIC):
axe0 at uhub0 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0
D-Link DUB-E100 rev B1 rev 2.00/0.01 addr 2
axe0:
Hello all,
how can i port forward UDP traffic to a host?
I have googled, FAQd, and tried this rule:
rdr on any proto udp from any to $ext_ip port 1194 - vpnserver
Kind regards,
Coert
On Tue, May 12, 2009 10:30, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
Hello all,
how can i port forward UDP traffic to a host?
I have googled, FAQd, and tried this rule:
rdr on any proto udp from any to $ext_ip port 1194 - vpnserver
try
rdr on $ext_if proto udp from any to any port 1194 - $vpnserver
2009/5/12 Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de:
Lovely! Will this make it into a future (stable) release (just to prepare
myself for november 1st)?
Yes, it's been commited already.
--
The best the little guy can do is what
the little guy does right
On Tuesday 12 May 2009 17:30:40 Coert Waagmeester wrote:
Hello all,
how can i port forward UDP traffic to a host?
I have googled, FAQd, and tried this rule:
rdr on any proto udp from any to $ext_ip port 1194 - vpnserver
This rule specifies redirection but do not allows packet to go
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:10:28AM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 10:30, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
Hello all,
how can i port forward UDP traffic to a host?
I have googled, FAQd, and tried this rule:
rdr on any proto udp from any to $ext_ip port 1194 - vpnserver
Not that large:-) I was thinking in the range of 1360 - 1480.
-Steve S.
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf
Of
Yuriy A. Dmitrishin
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 8:57 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: VPN and shared directories
Andrei GUDIU wrote:
Try to enable EXA and play with Option MigrationHeuristic greedy
I can confirm this solved my X problem. And it was really really a slow X.
I added
Option AccelMethod EXA
Option MigrationHeuristic greedy
in Section Device.
This also fixes issues
I use:
rdr on $ext_if proto udp from any to $ext_ip port 1194 - $vpn port 1194
where $vpn is the IP address of my VPN server. It looks like you're missing
the $ before vpnserver?
Also, don't forget to open up the port:
pass in quick on $ext_if proto udp from any to $vpn port 1194
PP2P3P5P=P8P9 P.P=P0P: e.yu...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/12 Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de:
Lovely! Will this make it into a future (stable) release (just to prepare
myself for november 1st)?
Yes, it's been commited already.
When and where? :)
--
No Swen today, my love has gone away
My
On 2009-05-12, Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de wrote:
PP2P3P5P=P8P9 P.P=P0P: e.yu...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/12 Helmut Schneider jumpe...@gmx.de:
Lovely! Will this make it into a future (stable) release (just to prepare
myself for november 1st)?
Yes, it's been commited already.
When and
2009/5/12 Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net:
Men, can't you guys just say thanks once in a while and just shut up!
Thanks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is FYI in case it interests anyone. I've given up on this board
and will be exhanging it.
Boots and runs: 4.4-i386
Fails to boot: 4.4-amd64, 4.5-i386, 4.5-amd64.
The amd64 disks will get to fdc0... and then hang indefinitely.
4.5-i386
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:47:32PM +0200, stefan+open...@rg-me.it wrote:
I've recently started playing around with the softraid(4) driver, as I
recently noticed that bsd.rd already comes with support for it. What I
want to accomplish is to place as much as possible into the RAID set
(RAID 1,
ropers wrote:
2009/5/12 Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net:
Men, can't you guys just say thanks once in a while and just shut up!
Thanks.
Good start, but you shouldn't thank me. The developers are the one that
deserved it big time, not me.
I am just one of many that get frustrated to see
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* Dan d...@ourbrains.org [2009-05-11 22:24]:
Henning Brauer(lists-open...@bsws.de)@2009.05.11 19:45:57 +0200:
but there is some rumor in usr.sbin/smtpd/ ...
This new smtpd better be at least as good as qmail,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:26 PM, bofh goodb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de
wrote:
* Dan d...@ourbrains.org [2009-05-11 22:24]:
Henning Brauer(lists-open...@bsws.de)@2009.05.11 19:45:57 +0200:
but there is some rumor in usr.sbin/smtpd/
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:26 PM, bofh goodb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also looking for a very simple MTA that I can use at home and have
it configured to relay e-mail without having to write 75 directives in
3 configuration files (and then use m4
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:26 PM, bofh goodb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also looking for a very simple MTA that I can use at home and have
it configured to relay e-mail without having to write 75 directives in
3 configuration files (and
I got a patch to try from Jonathan Gray. I've applied the
patch to the 4.4 sources (if_axe.c revision 1.85) and compiled
a new GENERIC kernel. Problem fixed! :-)
I just hope this will go into 4.6.
Well, below is Jonathan's patch.
Thanks very much for the quick fix!
Regards, Walter
Jonathan Gray
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:07 PM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:26 PM, bofh goodb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also looking for a very simple MTA that I can use at home and have
it configured to relay e-mail without
an MTA that has a horrible security track record.
Yes, Unix has a horrible security record. you shouldn't use it.
My god, remember all those horrible SunOS 4 exploits and the morris worm?
surely it must suck since software never changes.
-Bob
At 09:16 PM 5/12/2009 +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
If you want simple, install Webmin. Runs fine with sendmail, default
install!
I'm not that crazy to combine something that remembers passwords in
clear text with an MTA that has a horrible security track record.
If this is clear text,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:31 PM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
At 09:16 PM 5/12/2009 +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
If you want simple, install Webmin. Runs fine with sendmail, default
install!
I'm not that crazy to combine something that remembers passwords in
clear text with
At 09:55 PM 5/12/2009 +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:31 PM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
Also, if sendmail has such a horrible track record, why is it the default
MTA on this system? We handle 40K+ emails daily on a single box with no
problems at all.
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 09:55:48PM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:31 PM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
At 09:16 PM 5/12/2009 +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
If you want simple, install Webmin. Runs fine with sendmail, default
install!
I'm not
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:07 AM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:26 PM, bofh goodb...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also looking for a very simple MTA that I can use at home and have
it configured to relay e-mail without
At 02:22 PM 5/12/2009 -0700, Henry Sieff wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:07 AM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
If you want simple, install Webmin. Runs fine with sendmail, default
install!
Yeah, because if you can't see the complexity, it doesn't exist.
What does complexity have
Dan Harnett wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 09:55:48PM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:31 PM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
At 09:16 PM 5/12/2009 +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
If you want simple, install Webmin. Runs fine with sendmail, default
L. V. Lammert wrote:
At 02:22 PM 5/12/2009 -0700, Henry Sieff wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:07 AM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
If you want simple, install Webmin. Runs fine with sendmail, default
install!
Yeah, because if you can't see the complexity, it doesn't exist.
What
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:28 PM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
At 02:22 PM 5/12/2009 -0700, Henry Sieff wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:07 AM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
If you want simple, install Webmin. Runs fine with sendmail, default
install!
Yeah, because if
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote:
L. V. Lammert wrote:
At 02:22 PM 5/12/2009 -0700, Henry Sieff wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:07 AM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
If you want simple, install Webmin. Runs fine with sendmail, default
2009/5/11 Cem Kayali cemkay...@eticaret.com.tr:
Actually, i read through those messages, and in biref it is said that
we think it's worse to sign packages than not to sign them if you don't
have
a fairly strict process that ensures you have a correct chain of trust.
Without that, signatures
At 05:49 PM 5/12/2009 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
L. V. Lammert wrote:
Or as in this case may be use @gmail.com email as they can't obviously
setup their own mail server looks like. Or can make it secure, or set it
up with spam filter properly so they use @gmail.com.
Not everyone that have
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote:
OK, I need to stop feeding the trolls!
Told you it was going to be a long thread ;)
And thanks to Gilles (and of course, all the other developers on the
OpenBSD project, I have been propagating more systems at work year
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:16 PM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
At 05:49 PM 5/12/2009 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
L. V. Lammert wrote:
Or as in this case may be use @gmail.com email as they can't obviously
setup their own mail server looks like. Or can make it secure, or set it
up
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 09:55:48PM +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:31 PM, L. V. Lammert l...@omnitec.net wrote:
At 09:16 PM 5/12/2009 +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
If you want simple, install Webmin. Runs fine with sendmail, default
install!
I'm not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm still working on getting my system in shape to let me do the coding I'm
after. In doing my building of /usr/src, I'm hitting an odd problem, maybe if
you listen, you could let me know if you recognize it.
BTW, to begin with, I've read the manual
Chuck Robey schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm still working on getting my system in shape to let me do the coding I'm
after. In doing my building of /usr/src, I'm hitting an odd problem, maybe if
you listen, you could let me know if you recognize it.
BTW, to begin
Ok.
#pkg_delete acx-firmware
#cp /cdrom/Drivers/Win2000/FwRad16.bin /etc/firmware/tiacx111c16
#ifconfig acx0 up
Be happy.
2009/5/12 Andrej Elizarov vigilan...@gmail.com
Today i buy wifi card D-Link G650+ (PCMCIA) in hope to work at home with
Windows-powered box in ad-hoc mode.
Case bwi(4)
Dorian B|ttner wrote:
Chuck Robey schrieb:
Did you not only read the manual but the faq also? And is your system
actually running a version before 2008/11/11?
http://www.de.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade-old.html
No, 4.5 just came out, right? Anyhow, I saw the FAQ about PIE, so my question's
Beautyful, as it looks like!
I tried here on 2 300 GB U320, and the setup went through without any
warnings (?? most users encounter some?).
What I did was: (my system disk is sd0)
fdisk -iy sd1
fdisk -iy sd2
printf a\n\n\n\nRAID\nw\nq\n\n | disklabel -E sd1
printf a\n\n\n\nRAID\nw\nq\n\n |
On Wed, 13 May 2009 01:01:40 -0400, Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org
said:
between FreeBSD and OpenBSD. Getting this new OS up is really turning
out to be
fun (I like troubleshooting).
If you like troubleshooting then OpenBSD is going to be no fun for you.
OpenBSD Just Works
This isn't Linux
Uwe Dippel udippel at uniten.edu.my writes:
Now I wonder what to do. Will a traditional fsck do, or do I have to
recreate the softraid?
I guess, I can answer this myself, in the meantime:
I did the fsck of the softraid volume sd3a and sd3b
(the first one was clean, to be expected, the second
63 matches
Mail list logo
