seeing separate logs for differrent interfaces.

2009-11-02 Thread Siju George
Hi, I have 2 interfaces rl1 and sk0. I would like to see their logs separately using #pfctl -s info if I put set loginterface rl1 set loginterface sk0 in /etc/pf.conf and type #pfctl -s info it only shows log for sk0 --- # cat /etc/pf.conf |grep loginterface set logi

Re: Samba ID Mapping Question

2009-11-02 Thread David Gwynne
On 03/11/2009, at 12:24 PM, Erin O'Meara wrote: I have Installed an OpenBSD 4.6 Server with Samba + Active Directory + Cups. The OpenBSD Server is a Member Server in the Active Directory and Everything is working great. I have read about automatic ID mapping using Winbind. I realize that

Samba ID Mapping Question

2009-11-02 Thread Erin O'Meara
I have Installed an OpenBSD 4.6 Server with Samba + Active Directory + Cups. The OpenBSD Server is a Member Server in the Active Directory and Everything is working great. I have read about automatic ID mapping using Winbind. I realize that OpenBSD does not have Windbind, is there a way to have t

Re: svnd vs softraid for encrypting /home et al

2009-11-02 Thread Ted Unangst
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Jonathan Thornburg wrote: > In message > Ted Unangst wrote (commenting on using svnd for encrypting /home on > an OpenBSD laptop) >> 2. People should be advised to use softraid crypto now. > > I'd like to ask

Conheça os nossos Imoveis

2009-11-02 Thread Domus Plaza
[IMAGE] [IMAGE] DomusplazaDo mus EstC! inscrito na nossa lista misc@openbsd.org ApresentaC'C#o Domus Plaza == Na Domus Plaza Realizamos | AquisiC'C#o de ImC3veis | MediaC'C#o ImobiliC!ria | Consultoria de Investimento | SoluC'C5es Financeiras Temos uma VisC#o Global do

svnd vs softraid for encrypting /home et al

2009-11-02 Thread Jonathan Thornburg
In message Ted Unangst wrote (commenting on using svnd for encrypting /home on an OpenBSD laptop) > 2. People should be advised to use softraid crypto now. I'd like to ask a more general question: what are the tradeoffs between svnd and sof

Re: Packet forwarding performance

2009-11-02 Thread Bartosz Kuźma
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 20:47, Adriaan wrote: > Changing send and recvspace on a router has no effect, except > unnecessary taking away > memory space. > > When my ADSL line was upgraded to 896 up /7296 down the only thing to > speed up ftp download speed on > my workstation was to adjust B net.ine

Re: Packet forwarding performance

2009-11-02 Thread Bartosz Kuźma
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 21:35, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2009-11-02, Bartosz Ku??ma wrote: >> I have pair of routers configured with CARP, pfsync, trunk interface >> and a really simple pf. The main purpose of this system is >> load-balancing WWW traffic among two web servers. In production >>

Re: Where are ports changes for -stable?

2009-11-02 Thread Scott McEachern
Robert wrote: First there are the commit messages on the ports-changes mailinglist. Look for those tagged OPENBSD_4_6. When you update your local cvs checkout, just ommit the -q option and you will see every changed file, so you don't have to manually dive into the tree. - Robert I ha

Re: Packet forwarding performance

2009-11-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-11-02, Adriaan wrote: > When my ADSL line was upgraded to 896 up /7296 down the only thing to > speed up ftp download speed on > my workstation was to adjust net.inet.tcp.recvspace to 65536. there is less risk of hitting router bugs and misconfigured stateful firewalls if your buffer is

Re: Packet forwarding performance

2009-11-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-11-02, Bartosz Ku??ma wrote: > I have pair of routers configured with CARP, pfsync, trunk interface > and a really simple pf. The main purpose of this system is > load-balancing WWW traffic among two web servers. In production > environment rdr will be replaced by relayd(8). All of them ru

Re: Packet forwarding performance

2009-11-02 Thread Adriaan
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Bartosz KuE:ma wrote: [snip] I did system tuning according to > https://calomel.org/network_performance.html (changed send and > recevspace to 256144 and several more minor improvements) but without > effect. > > How can I improve packet forwarding speed? Or I just

Re: 4.6 reboots x336 ibm server(s)

2009-11-02 Thread FRLinux
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote: > no. kettenis needs to see a pci -v -xx of this machine. Send in the > acpidump -o as well. I can't volunteer his time so he'll look at it > whenever he'll look at it. # pcidump -v -xx Domain /dev/pci0: 0:0:0: Intel E7520 Host 0

postcard

2009-11-02 Thread webmaster
your email: e-c...@hallmark.com your name: hallmark.com subiect: You have recieved A Hallmark E-Card.! Hallmark.comShop OnlineHallmark MagazineE-Cards & MoreAt Gold Crown You have recieved A Hallmark E-Card. Hello! You have recieved a Hallmark E-Card. To see it, click here, There's something

[no subject]

2009-11-02 Thread Mareline Bertier
Bonjour tres cher Je suis trC(s ravie deB vous envoyer ce messageB et tous le plaisir est pour moi deB correspondreB avec vousB . je me normeB Mareline bertier jbai 27 ans et je vie particuliC(rement C Ottawa une ville de Canada .je suis directrice de l'ONG ASS (Aides Services Secours ).B Pour te

Packet forwarding performance

2009-11-02 Thread Bartosz Kuźma
Hi all! I have pair of routers configured with CARP, pfsync, trunk interface and a really simple pf. The main purpose of this system is load-balancing WWW traffic among two web servers. In production environment rdr will be replaced by relayd(8). All of them running on Dell R200 (see attached dmes

Re: umask for remote host in sftp / sftp-server

2009-11-02 Thread Lars Nooden
Darren Tucker wrote: > Lars Nooden wrote: >> How can umask be set on the remote host for chrooted sftp users? > > You can set it on the server side with sftp-server's "-u" option but > that's very new (post 4.6). > > You would have something like this in sshd_config: > > Subsystem sftp sftp-serv

Re: Where are ports changes for -stable?

2009-11-02 Thread Ted Unangst
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Robert wrote: > When you update your local cvs checkout, just ommit the -q option and > you will see every changed file, so you don't have to manually dive into > the tree. cvs will print changed files even with -q. -q just tells it to omit the directory traversal

Re: Where are ports changes for -stable?

2009-11-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-11-02, Scott McEachern wrote: > Henning Brauer wrote: >> yyou need to upgrade php to 5.2.11, from -stable. >> >> > Sorry if I have missed something, but where would I find the ports > changes for -stable? (Other than manually looking in each port's > Makefile details.) Until Henning

Re: Where are ports changes for -stable?

2009-11-02 Thread Robert
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:05:28 -0500 Scott McEachern wrote: > Henning Brauer wrote: > > yyou need to upgrade php to 5.2.11, from -stable. > > > > > Sorry if I have missed something, but where would I find the ports > changes for -stable? (Other than manually looking in each port's > Makefile

Re: 4.6 arriving

2009-11-02 Thread Matthias Pfeifer
last friday in Hannover, Germany :) Many many thanks to the OpenBSD team for this (and all other) release! Great job, like ever.

Re: 4.6 arriving

2009-11-02 Thread jean-francois
Le dimanche 04 octobre 2009 C 00:37 -0600, Theo de Raadt a C)crit : > > [...] > You're right. Everything else which we do is so complicated, so why > can't we coordinate 50+ people we don't know to setup special accounts > on their ftp servers. Why can't we do something so trivial? Must be > si