On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 09:44:31AM +0900, Jordi Beltran Creix wrote:
> In 47.html, in "Assorted Improvements", there is:
> # malloc(2) now has an S flag to turn on the options that help
> debugging and improve security.
> It links to malloc(3) correctly, though.
fixed, thanks.
jmc
Folks, yes, I appreciate your attempt to help a lot. And I really am on
your side if we're talking about "normal" machines.
However, obviously nobody believes me when I say "For us there is no
reason to update to newer versions of OpenBSD yet. On the contrary,
maintenance is a lot easier for us if
Thanks for all your replies.
I guess my original questions were perhaps
written in haste, however in a way I still think it would make sense for
OpenBSD to check the permissions of key files (/etc/security style).I
would have thought there is no reason why files already owned by root in a
defa
On 2010-03-21, a b wrote:
> Thanks for all your replies.
>
> I guess my original questions were perhaps
> written in haste, however in a way I still think it would make sense for
> OpenBSD to check the permissions of key files (/etc/security style).I
> would have thought there is no reason why
Hey there... it's Phillip Jones,
The long awaited release of Book 2 - Crystal Moon, Magic of Luvelles and
the next edition of Book 1 - Crystal Moon, World of Grayham has finally
arrived. You can order the next book of the series at
WorldsOfTheCrystalMoon.com Books will come signed for you.
Cryst
While in Japan I have been intrigued by this machine:
http://onkyodirect.jp/pc/dx/
I'd love to see a dmesg if someone has one. If someone has one laying
around I'd like to touch it for a few weeks. I suspect pretty bad ACPI
and other neat issues that need fixing.
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Marco Peereboom wrote:
While in Japan I have been intrigued by this machine:
http://onkyodirect.jp/pc/dx/
I'd love to see a dmesg if someone has one. If someone has one laying
around I'd like to touch it for a few weeks. I suspect pretty bad ACPI
and other neat issues tha
On 21 March 2010 14:54, Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
>> While in Japan I have been intrigued by this machine:
>> http://onkyodirect.jp/pc/dx/
>>
>> I'd love to see a dmesg if someone has one. If someone has one laying
>> around I'd like to touch it for a fe
"T. Valent" at 2010-03-21 10:36:59
wrote:
>In the end it seems like I have to give up the idea of keeping all
>installations on the same level, it seems like I have create a complete
>new platform (new motherboard type and new OpenBSD version) for all new
>customers, just because I cannot find
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:36:59AM +0100, T. Valent wrote:
> In the end it seems like I have to give up the idea of keeping all
> installations on the same level, it seems like I have create a complete
> new platform (new motherboard type and new OpenBSD version) for all new
> customers, just becau
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:46:05AM -0500, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
> "T. Valent" at 2010-03-21 10:36:59
> wrote:
>
> >In the end it seems like I have to give up the idea of keeping all
> >installations on the same level, it seems like I have create a complete
> >new platform (new motherboard type
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:36 +0100, "T. Valent" wrote:
> In the end it seems like I have to give up the idea of keeping all
> installations on the same level, it seems like I have create a complete
> new platform (new motherboard type and new OpenBSD version) for all new
> customers, just because I
T. Valent wrote:
> Folks, yes, I appreciate your attempt to help a lot. And I really am on
> your side if we're talking about "normal" machines.
>
> However, obviously nobody believes me when I say "For us there is no
> reason to update to newer versions of OpenBSD yet. On the contrary,
> maintena
Brad Tilley wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:36 +0100, "T. Valent" wrote:
>
>> In the end it seems like I have to give up the idea of keeping all
>> installations on the same level, it seems like I have create a complete
>> new platform (new motherboard type and new OpenBSD version) for all new
>>
Hi,
Firstly, I think the ospfd man page should mention that it will do the
right thing when carp interfaces are added as passive. Currently the
only way to find out about this seems to be to search the archives.
Secondly, I have a test environment with a pair of boxes with a
large-ish number of v
PDF 2010 NEWSLETTER
March 21st 2010 ---
[http://www.listmanagerservices.com/link.php?M=89681971&N=24252&L=23174&F=T
Copyright PDF2010 B) 2010 - All rights reserved
43 Main St | Aberdeen | CA 92274 | USA | Tel: 760-321-9009 | Fax
760-321-9008
Clic
Nick Holland wrote:
With Windows, Solaris or Linux, you hunt down drivers when new
hardware comes out. OpenBSD makes you do some work, too -- upgrade to
a new release. My experience has been that upgrading is easier than
hunting down the new drivers.
I think that this fact is a pretty good
> Thanks for all your replies.
>
> I guess my original questions were perhaps
> written in haste, however in a way I still think it would make sense for
> OpenBSD to check the permissions of key files (/etc/security style).I
> would have thought there is no reason why files already owned by ro
Hello Theo,
"my crazy idea" > /dev/null 2>&1
Happy now ? ;-)
-
Original Message
From: Theo de Raadt
To: a b
Cc: Adriaan ;
misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Sun, 21 March, 2010 16:57:51
Subject: Re: siteXX.tgz
and install.site behaviour questions
> Thanks for all your replies.
>
> I
guess
Hi there,
I switched to a new DSL provider, and this provider assigns an IP address
using DHCP. No problem, a hostname.msk1 with just "dhcp" in it works great.
When digging a bit deeper (purely out of interest), I noticed that
/sbin/dhclient-script explicitly does:
route add $new_ip_address 127.
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:34:14 -0400 Nick Holland
wrote:
> The great fantasy of many people in the IT world is lots of identical
> hardware and software. Sorry, this is completely unrealistic, or at
> least completely unhealthy, in the big picture.
Until they understand reality and finally achiev
I have two OpenBSD 4.6-stable boxes which I am having network
performance issues with while ALTQ is in use. This testing is being
performed while there is virtually no source of load on the boxes. I'm
looking to find out if this a limitation of ALTQ throughput, or
something with my configuration. I
Miod Vallat wrote:
Hi all,
I've been working on getting gpsd working on one of my old Sun IPXes but
I've run into a problem with ldattach needing the /dev/cuaa device. The
serial port /dev/ttya is working with gpsd directly but ldattach requires
/dev/cuaa. However, according to the system l
Miod Vallat wrote:
Hi all,
I've been working on getting gpsd working on one of my old Sun IPXes but
I've run into a problem with ldattach needing the /dev/cuaa device. The
serial port /dev/ttya is working with gpsd directly but ldattach requires
/dev/cuaa. However, according to the system l
Hai,
Kamu direferensikan oleh:
Nama : K.WIDJANARKO/Male/41 tahun
Kota : SEMARANG
Deskripsi : SD Teladan bankinang,SD PA3 mageleng,SMPN 7magelang,sma
1Magelang,plp curug tangerang,PT Angkasa pura I air traffic controller
Untuk bergabung dalam program Berburu Genk Ovi dan kesempatan meraih Honda
J
a b c
26 matches
Mail list logo
