On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 05:24:21PM -0400, Kenneth Gober wrote:
>
> it looks like an interesting idea, but I'm not sure what vulnerability it
> protects you from.
Stupid things as dumb as someone diddling your path to run a trojan
instead of ls, replacing a library file (or doing the same with
LD_
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Milin wrote:
> I've just read about NetBSD's veriexec and I think it would be great
> to have it in OpenBSD.
> Is anyone working on porting/rewrite? If not, could you write why? Is
> it because some caveat in veriexec's design, not enough time, or just
> lack of de
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Milin wrote:
> I've just read about NetBSD's veriexec and I think it would be great
> to have it in OpenBSD.
> Is anyone working on porting/rewrite? If not, could you write why? Is
> it because some caveat in veriexec's design, not enough time, or just
> lack of dev
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 14:21, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> which limit do I need to change as it's able to start with '-m 350m'
> or less? Here it says data-*
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=128031574632013&w=2 , but I have
> it more then 500 and it's not able to start with more then 35
Hello,
Le 29/08/2010 23:38, Martin PelikC!n a C)crit :
I've seen way too many faulty/misbehaving uplcom's. Have you tried
different piece of hardware?
I justed tested with Prolific 2303 (not X) and I could work for 2 hours
without disconnection.
So it might be a buggy adapter or a buggy
Hi all,
I've just read about NetBSD's veriexec and I think it would be great
to have it in OpenBSD.
Is anyone working on porting/rewrite? If not, could you write why? Is
it because some caveat in veriexec's design, not enough time, or just
lack of developers' interest?
Thanks in advance,
Merlyn
Hi all,
which limit do I need to change as it's able to start with '-m 350m'
or less? Here it says data-*
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=128031574632013&w=2 , but I have
it more then 500 and it's not able to start with more then 350
$ qemu --version
QEMU PC emulator version 0.12.4, Copyright
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
> Say I have a macppc machine and it dies. Could I
> mount the disk on an i386 one to salvage the information?
> With a ffs filesystem of course.
No, the filesystem is endian dependent.
Hi all.
Say I have a macppc machine and it dies. Could I
mount the disk on an i386 one to salvage the information?
With a ffs filesystem of course.
Thanks.
--rodolfo
MAITRISER LA PRATIQUE DES MARCHES PUBLICS
MODULE ENTREPRISES: MAITRISER LA PRATIQUE DES MARCHES PUBLICS DE
FORMATION ET POLE EMPLOI
(Nouveau calendrier: second semestre 2010)
Module enrichi de 2 siances de travaux pratiques sur la dimatirialisation
et la gestion des demandes et contestations des
Si no es este tu correo o si deseas cancelar la suscripcisn haz clic aqum
Si no puedes visualizar este correo, haz clic aqum
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Cuarto Informe de Gobierno
Hola:
www.informe.gob.mx
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Si no es este tu co
2010/9/1 sven falempin
> @michal - I don't want to regularly launch a command: i'm looking for a
> command that answer interface status. Like the ifconfig status.
> @chadwick - Yes the ifconfig output may be parsed but it may change, (for
> example the trunk interfaces output has change recently)
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:57:46 +0200
sven falempin wrote:
> ( gmail shorcut :( )
>
> to update a file with status of interfaces. it looks like a 'hack'.
>
> So ifstated is event driven (and monitor changes), how should my script
> check the current state of an interfaces ? without parsing the outp
( gmail shorcut :( )
to update a file with status of interfaces. it looks like a 'hack'.
So ifstated is event driven (and monitor changes), how should my script
check the current state of an interfaces ? without parsing the output of
ifconfig who often changes.
regards.
2010/9/1 sven falempin
Hello,
I am looking for a simple way to check interfaces states, I just read
ifconfig, netstat and ifstated manpages.
So i may use ifstated to upda
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Jean-Francois wrote:
I'm thinking about starting something aroung openbsd such as a layer
making it an easy enough to manage home nas server of good quality.
That capability is already there. As others mention, NFS is in base and
Samba can easily be added from ports.
Th
16 matches
Mail list logo