I apologize if this is the wrong place to post this but, Section 3
"Checking the kernel" of the upgrade49.html doc has version numbers that
probably should be fixed:
"...if you had a modified kernel in 4.7, it is likely you will need to
modify the stock kernel of 4.8..."
I believe this should be
I'm an OpenBSD virgin and have just installed 4.8 on a ThinkPad T-23. The
wired Ethernet adapter works fine, but I can't get a connection with a
D-Link MA-521 adapter. Can anyone shed some light on what I'm doing wrong?
(p.s. I can connect with my Win7 laptop fine)
Dale
IBM ThinkPad T-2
You're missing the point.
I don't see what your point is at all. The whole time you've been asking
for block level encryption that is cross platform instead of addressing
why using an encrypted archive for transportation is not sufficient. This
should cover 99% of your needs. If you have t
I am using kernel pppoe and I would like to know if it is possible to add the
pppoe0 interface to a bridge? If so, how do I do it? Do I need to set a link0
flag?
Thanks
On 30 April 2011 18:38, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:31:37 -0400
> Kraktus wrote:
>
>> If Eve did know about cracking into Windows computers, then of course
>> Alice's plan would be foiled unless she could persuade Bob to switch
>> to a better operating system -- not likely, sinc
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:31:37 -0500, Kraktus wrote:
Try to imagine a more mundane scenario.
All of your scenarios are ridiculous. Just share the files in an encrypted
archive and get over it. Any time you allow your "super secret" files to
exist on a computer you don't own or maintain you
Hi,
I've been trying to get OpenOSPFd working on OpenBSD 4.8 using an GRE over
IPsec approach. The GRE tunnel is working for unicast IPv4 packets. I've seen
that there are reject routes for 224.0.0.0/4 in the default configuration and
set multicast_host to yes which adds the route to the default i
Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade49.html
>>
>
> With release around the corner it's a good time for a reminder:
>
> If you're doing this for the upgrade to 4.9 be very careful to do the
> untarring exactly as suggested: backup /sbin/reboot first, and untar in
> the
The following patch against -current enables the Samsung Galaxy S
Android device (Samsung Captivate with AT&T) to be be used for USB
tethering.
With or without this patch, the device can still act as a modem and
can be used with PPP. With this patch, the device can be used as an IP
router over US
- This mail is a HTML mail. Not all elements could be shown in plain text
mode. -
Nova adesco de seguranga da Caixa Economica Federal
Prezado Cliente,
Foi langada uma atualizagco para o cadastramento de computadores, com a fusco
Banco Santander e Real i necessaria a sua atualizagco cadastral para
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:31:37 -0400
Kraktus wrote:
> If Eve did know about cracking into Windows computers, then of course
> Alice's plan would be foiled unless she could persuade Bob to switch
> to a better operating system -- not likely, since he's so stubborn --
> or waited for him to come to he
On 2011-04-30, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 04/30/11 05:53, David Steiner wrote:
>> can the upgrade process via bsd.rd be automated? i'm thinking of
>> upgrading remote machines, which are only available via ssh .
>>
>> like this: fetch the latest bsd.rd from ftp. replace /bsd.rd.
>> echo 'boot bsd.r
On 11-04-30 11:02 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:52:21AM -0700, Emille Blanc wrote:
On 11-04-29 12:08 AM, pavel pocheptsov wrote:
pass in on $int_if inet proto udp from any to $int_if port tftp
You do have a pass out rule in pf, right?
I'm assuming you have a default bloc
On 30 April 2011 13:50, Kraktus wrote:
> On 30/04/2011, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:04:32 -0400
>> Kraktus wrote:
>>
>>> What the encrypted external drive *does* do is protect me from a thief
>>> who jumps me along the way, while I am carrying the data.
>>
>> In which case vnc
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 10:52:21AM -0700, Emille Blanc wrote:
> On 11-04-29 12:08 AM, pavel pocheptsov wrote:
> >pass in on $int_if inet proto udp from any to $int_if port tftp
> You do have a pass out rule in pf, right?
> I'm assuming you have a default block in place somewhere, and since
> TFTP
On 11-04-29 12:08 AM, pavel pocheptsov wrote:
pass in on $int_if inet proto udp from any to $int_if port tftp
You do have a pass out rule in pf, right?
I'm assuming you have a default block in place somewhere, and since TFTP
uses UDP, pf won't create a state so you'll need an explicit pass out.
On 30/04/2011, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:11:21 +0200
> Thomas de Grivel wrote:
>
>> 2011/4/29 Kraktus
>>
>> > On 28/04/2011, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:56:57 -0400
>> > > Kraktus wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> So, I think OpenBSD tops the list of operating sy
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:04:32 -0400
Kraktus wrote:
> What the encrypted external drive *does* do is protect me from a thief
> who jumps me along the way, while I am carrying the data.
In which case vnconfig and bioctl are just fine. You seem to be jumping
about, you can use the following for porta
On 2011/04/30 10:14, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >
> > The only _maintained_ software raid on OpenBSD is softraid(4), that
> > has only just recently had code written to allow booting from it and
> > it's not committed yet.
>
> Really? The notes at
> http://www.eclectica.ca/howto/openbsd-software-r
On 30/04/2011, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
> 2011/4/29 Kraktus
>
>> On 28/04/2011, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:56:57 -0400
>> > Kraktus wrote:
>> >
>> >> So, I think OpenBSD tops the list of operating systems that "just
>> >> work". The only thing I really wish for is more encr
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 17:11:21 +0200
Thomas de Grivel wrote:
> 2011/4/29 Kraktus
>
> > On 28/04/2011, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:56:57 -0400
> > > Kraktus wrote:
> > >
> > >> So, I think OpenBSD tops the list of operating systems that "just
> > >> work". The only thing I r
2011/4/29 Kraktus
> On 28/04/2011, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:56:57 -0400
> > Kraktus wrote:
> >
> >> So, I think OpenBSD tops the list of operating systems that "just
> >> work". The only thing I really wish for is more encryption options for
> >> softraid.
> >
> > And mor
On 4/30/2011 11:24 AM, Nick Holland wrote:
um...
bsd.rd assumes console.
Related to that, the old HP/Compaq Remote Insight Board products work
well in non-Compaq hardware, and give remote access to KVM (web/Java
interface) and serial (Java or ssh). http://webdevsys.com/lightsOut.htm
has a p
On 04/30/11 05:53, David Steiner wrote:
> can the upgrade process via bsd.rd be automated? i'm thinking of
> upgrading remote machines, which are only available via ssh .
>
> like this: fetch the latest bsd.rd from ftp. replace /bsd.rd.
> echo 'boot bsd.rd' >> /etc/boot.conf
> reboot
>
> from her
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011-04-29, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Stuart Henderson
>> wrote:
>>> On 2011-04-29, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
So, I'm looking for recommendations. Modest 1U pizza boxes?
>>>
>>> R210? (as
On 04/30/11 01:34, George Georgalis wrote:
> Nico, I don't know what your "risk" is, but if it's a perimeter
> box running pf and ssh maybe consider running on cflash or usb
> stick? Or one of those bootable cdroms? I log to a ram fs so I
> think the only media writes are for ntp.drift, and yes I'm
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 07:54:53 -0500
Chris Bennett wrote:
> I use http://corenetworks.net/
> They offer OpenBSD as an option, including installation.
> They also offer IP KVM so that you can do the install yourself if you want
> to. Only requires a browser with Java (firefox35)
>
> Chris Bennett
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:34 AM, George Georgalis wrote:
> Nico, I don't know what your "risk" is, but if it's a perimeter
> box running pf and ssh maybe consider running on cflash or usb
> stick? Or one of those bootable cdroms? I log to a ram fs so I
> think the only media writes are for ntp.dri
A presente e-newsletter destina-se znica e exclusivamente a informar e nco
pode ser considerada SPAM. De acordo com a legislagco internacional que
regulamenta o correio electrsnico, "o e-mail nco podera ser considerado SPAM
quando incluir uma forma do receptor ser removido da lista". Caso o seu nom
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:54, David Steiner wrote:
> can the upgrade process via bsd.rd be automated?
Yes, see e.g. Yaifo. The link came by earlier this week on the list.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/yaifo/files/yaifo/4.8/yaifo-4.8.tgz/download
Regards,
Rogier
can the upgrade process via bsd.rd be automated? i'm thinking of
upgrading remote machines, which are only available via ssh .
like this: fetch the latest bsd.rd from ftp. replace /bsd.rd.
echo 'boot bsd.rd' >> /etc/boot.conf
reboot
from here on, i'd like to automate the upgrade process, by provi
On 2011-04-29, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>> On 2011-04-29, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>>
>>> So, I'm looking for recommendations. Modest 1U pizza boxes?
>>
>> R210? (as long as you don't need externally accessible disks.)
>>
>>> Even b
32 matches
Mail list logo
