On Jun 18 08:10:05, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 05:53:10PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > Since a few snapshots ago, current/amd64 has occassionaly
> > > been interrupting like crazy on my macbook. top(1) shows
> > > above 90% interrupt, and
> > >
> > > $ apm
> > > Battery state
Salam Sejahtera/Good Day!!
I am Norasiah Binti Othman, a MALAYSIAN, Based in United Kingdom ,I will be
pleased to have a discussion with you on my company intended offshore
partnership,in which you will stand as a middle man between my company and the
supplier of this product there in MALAYSIA. If
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:13:10 -0700
patrick keshishian wrote:
> > added daemons have different connotations from those included in obsd
> > base, and this also applies to debian and derivatives. the closest
> > parallel would be packages built from ports and the automation pkg_add
> > performs on i
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:32:55 +0200 (CEST)
Francois Pussault wrote:
> Hi,
> I upgrade only when i need to, or when a version is done, to buy CD
> & give money to the project.
> So twice a year maximum, but most often on spring version once a year
Really it depends on the apps you run. If you use f
Dear Webmaster,
I recently came across journal.reallyenglish.com through search and
really like it. I was just wondering if you would like to exchange links
with me?
You may be aware that exchanging links would be mutually beneficial and
also very helpful in increasing traffic or visitors for bot
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:02:08 -0400
Juan Miscaro wrote:
> Was wondering what advantages OpenBSD has over a progressive Linux
> distribution such as Ubuntu (Server edition). One thing I noticed is
> that they're having a hell of a time transitioning away from the
> traditional sysvinit-based system
Hi Misc@,
Getting this panic over and over on a router. Something with uvm and
tcp_input. IPMI was enabled to get system sensors.
dmesg 29 May
OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #20: Sun May 29 04:42:43 WIT 2011
r...@aggregation-rf.mygreenlinks.net:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compi
On 2011-07-12, Insan Praja SW wrote:
> Hi Misc@,
> Getting this panic over and over on a router. Something with uvm and
> tcp_input. IPMI was enabled to get system sensors.
man crash
"CRASH LOCATION DETERMINATION"
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq2.html
"How to gather further information from a k
(a) not enough information
(b) you enabled things which are disabled for a good reason.
> Hi Misc@,
> Getting this panic over and over on a router. Something with uvm and
> tcp_input. IPMI was enabled to get system sensors.
>
> dmesg 29 May
>
>
> OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #
Hello,
with latest snapshot (Jul 11 2011) I see this strange behavior
which I haven't seen before upgrade (ping caught by strange pf
rule).
$ id ;netstat -rnf inet | grep default
uid=1000(jirib) gid=10(users) groups=10(users), 0(wheel), 5(operator)
default192.168.1.1UGS
A snapshot upgrade for both i386 and amd64
OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #10: Mon Jul 11 12:31:05 MDT 2011
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #19: Mon Jul 11 12:20:24 MDT 2011
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/a
Hope this is accurate and helping, just trying to do the homework :).
OpenBSD 4.9 GENERIC.MP i386 -current panic repeatedly. The machine is
consistently following -current building from the source.
DMESG - 29th May 2011 Kernel
$ dmesg
OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC
You are not listening.
You enabled ipmi. It is disabled for a damn good reason. You
expect us to read your bug report, but you have made it quite clear
to us that you are more clever than us, because you have enabled it.
You make a change -> You are on your own.
During a snapshot upgrade for both i386 and amd64
OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #10: Mon Jul 11 12:31:05 MDT 2011
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #19: Mon Jul 11 12:20:24 MDT 2011
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys
> For what good reason should ipmi be disabled?
For what reason should pciide be enabled?
Around here, we make the decisions and we are responsible for the
decisions we make. If you make any decisions which are different
from ours, you are responsible for your own decisions.
pciide is enabled b
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011, Remco wrote:
> During a snapshot upgrade for both i386 and amd64
>
> OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #10: Mon Jul 11 12:31:05 MDT 2011
> dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
>
> OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #19: Mon Jul 11 12:20:24 MDT
[IMAGE]
Pms de Mixico Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico presenta:Identificacisn
de Procesos y Desarrollo de un Manual de Polmticas y
Procedimientos.25 de Julio, Ciudad de Mixico.Expositor: Ing.
Enrique Castro B.10 horas de entrenamiento, Conozca los
beneficios de capacitarse con
On 7/11/11 10:48 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, patrick keshishian wrote:
you failed at making any point.
i'll rebrand it into convenient twitter format:
debian splits packages to the point where a single service is a
associated to a single top level package, meani
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011, k...@servihoo.net wrote:
> For what good reason should ipmi be disabled?
is not working a good reason?
Please don't. This whole thread has gotten really stupid.
Unless you have something funny to add, let's kill it now.
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:11 -0700, "Mehma Sarja"
wrote:
> On 7/11/11 10:48 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, patrick keshishian
> > wrote:
> >> you fai
On 2011-07-12, Jiri B wrote:
> Hello,
>
> with latest snapshot (Jul 11 2011) I see this strange behavior
> which I haven't seen before upgrade (ping caught by strange pf
> rule).
You have important information which you didn't include: the date
when it last worked.
Ideally read through the commi
Help, i shot it three times and I'm on my fourth monitor, 3 bullets
left. What next?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Eric Furman wrote:
> Please don't. This whole thread has gotten really stupid.
> Unless you have something funny to add, let's kill it now.
>
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:11 -0700, "M
shoot it again son.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Zeb Packard wrote:
> Help, i shot it three times and I'm on my fourth monitor, 3 bullets
> left. What next?
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Eric Furman wrote:
> > Please don't. This whole thread has gotten really stupid.
> > Unle
I think it worked.
Sent from my iclone.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> shoot it again son.
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Zeb Packard wrote:
>> Help, i shot it three times and I'm on my fourth monitor, 3 bullets
>> left. What next?
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 12,
brraaiiinsss. B-)
On Jul 12, 2011, at 7:25 PM, Zeb Packard wrote:
> I think it worked.
>
> Sent from my iclone.
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Marco Peereboom
wrote:
>> shoot it again son.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Zeb Packard wrote:
>>> Help, i shot it three tim
Hi Nigel,
The SSL certificate itself does not have any part in this problem as it
never gets that far in the process. As I wrote previously, the TCP
handshake never completes -- e.g. netstat & co. never see a connection
in any kind of state. I did try the suggested openssl command as well
as l
On 11 Jul 2011 at 20:59, Paul Suh wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Jacob L. Leifman wrote:
>
> > Environment:
> > - OpenBSD 4.9, stock (base) apache with self-signed certificate
> > - behind a SOHO NAT router (with relevant in-bound redirects)
> >
> > Problem: non-local SSL connections never
186135
[IMAGE]
Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico presenta:
Manejo de Proveedores 3600
18 de Julio, Ciudad de Mixico.
Expositor: Ariel Valero Cruz
10 horas de entrenamiento.
Empresa Registrada ante la STPS Reg. COLG640205CP30005
Smguenos en Twitter@pmscapacitacion o bien en Facebook PMS de
On 07/12/11 14:34, Remco wrote:
> A snapshot upgrade for both i386 and amd64
>
> OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #10: Mon Jul 11 12:31:05 MDT 2011
> dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
>
> OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #19: Mon Jul 11 12:20:24 MDT 2011
>
On Jul 12, 2011, at 9:35 PM, Jacob L. Leifman wrote:
>> FWIW, I'm guessing that the problem is at the router. The packet trace is
>> showing a TCP SYN coming from the client, followed correctly by a SYN-ACK
>> going back from the server. The client should send an ACK packet back, but
>> instead it
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> On 07/12/11 14:34, Remco wrote:
>> A snapshot upgrade for both i386 and amd64
>>
>> OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #10: Mon Jul 11 12:31:05 MDT 2011
>> dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
>>
>> OpenBSD 4.9-
Thanks for pointing this out, it was an oversight in the recent changes
to pf_test_rule().
I recommend specifying explicitly the correct protocols if you're
wanting to to match by user/group/os fingerprints.
block return out log proto { tcp, udp } all user = 1002
If you'd like, you can a
Politicas de Privacidad Si no puede ver esta informacisn haga click aqum
[IMAGE]
POLMTICAS DE CANCELACISN
[IMAGE]
Corporativo Fiscal Dicada, S.C. posee una rmgida polmtica contra el
SPAMming, por lo que respetamos su privacidad. Por favor, si usted no
desea recibir mas informacisn y comunicados
33 matches
Mail list logo
