Hello there,
I cannot open a HTML file of 25Mb with firefox, also the file can be
opened with lynx with the following remark:
Maximum nesting of HTML elements exceeded.
May someone help me?
Regards,
Igor.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:15 AM, igor denisov saufe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello there,
I cannot open a HTML file of 25Mb with firefox, also the file can be
opened with lynx with the following remark:
Maximum nesting of HTML elements exceeded.
Do firefox says something when started from
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 10:20:58AM -0500, Damon Getsman wrote:
I've been looking through the FAQs and some on the forums, and I've come up
with the conclusion that I'm not able to mount a linux ext4fs partition on
my OpenBSD 4.9 system due to the fact that ext4fs isn't supported
[allegedly].
On 08/22/11 06:03, Damon Getsman wrote:
Alright, so restoring the contents of /etc/login.conf has, indeed, fixed my
ability to login via whatever means and use sudo. Quite honestly I don't
know how all of those lines got deleted from it, unless I left it open in
vim and the cat jumped on the
On 22 aug 2011, at 07:45, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
Try OpenBSD outside of KVM on real HW and you will see where's the
bottleneck. Anyway getting 400Mbit/s under virtualization seems pretty
fine or try to compare with OpenBSD running in VMware as there's fine
support for that use.
Of course
On 08/22/11 10:59, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Rants.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Per-Olov SjC6holm p...@incedo.org wrote:
On 22 aug 2011, at 07:45, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
Try OpenBSD outside of KVM on real HW and you will see where's the
bottleneck. Anyway getting 400Mbit/s under virtualization seems pretty
fine or try to compare with OpenBSD
On 2011-08-21 17.20, Damon Getsman wrote:
I've been looking through the FAQs and some on the forums, and I've come up
with the conclusion that I'm not able to mount a linux ext4fs partition on
my OpenBSD 4.9 system due to the fact that ext4fs isn't supported
[allegedly]. I've even tried using
AFAIK, OpenBSD kernel is not designed accounting for any form of
virtualization toy, so don't even try figuring performance numbers out
of it. These will be plain wrong.
As http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html states, there's little you can
tweak to improve your numbers; just get a
Plz, don't top post
sorry. Sometimes I forgot because here are different rules.
Just try and make your emails look nice and easy to read if you want
other people to read them, especially if you're asking others for help.
Before you hit send, read through your email, if it doesn't look good,
On Aug 22, 2011 11:51 AM, Benny Lofgren bl-li...@lofgren.biz wrote:
I'm not familiar with ext4, but as Christian Barthel suggested it might be
possible to mount it specifying ext2fs as the file system type, but if you
do so, make sure to mount it read-only. It might ruin your file system (and
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:29:47AM +0200, Christian Barthel wrote:
I am not quite sure (not an ext4 user) but you can mount ext4 the same
way, you mount ext3 or ext2.
mount -t ext2fs dev mountpoint
Maybe, it's dangerous and should be avoided (ext4 is a journaling
filesystem, ext2 not!).
On 22 aug 2011, at 12:09, Daniel Gracia wrote:
AFAIK, OpenBSD kernel is not designed accounting for any form of
virtualization toy, so don't even try figuring performance numbers out of it.
These will be plain wrong.
As http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html states, there's little you can tweak
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:29:45 +0200
Pascal Stumpf pascal.stu...@cubes.de wrote:
Iirc, this only works on ext3 (without journaling ofc), not ext4.
FreeBSD had a GSoC project last year to implement ext4fs (as a separate
module/driver): http://wiki.freebsd.org/SOC2010ZhengLiu But it's not
even
With today's snapshot, I can no longer kill X with crtl+alt+backspace.
Has something changed? Is DontZap turned on by default now? I am not
using any config file.
Also, the starting X says
cwm: config file /home/hans/.cwmrc has errors, not loading
but I don't have a ~/.cwmrc
On 2011-08-22 17.19, Jan Stary wrote:
With today's snapshot, I can no longer kill X with crtl+alt+backspace.
Has something changed? Is DontZap turned on by default now? I am not
using any config file.
Ah, I've experienced the same thing but in an amd64 environment.
In my case it started a
On Mon 2011.08.22 at 17:19 +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
With today's snapshot, I can no longer kill X with crtl+alt+backspace.
Has something changed? Is DontZap turned on by default now? I am not
using any config file.
I believe that's fixed in -current.
Also, the starting X says
cwm:
On 2011-08-22 17.19, Jan Stary wrote:
With today's snapshot, I can no longer kill X with crtl+alt+backspace.
Has something changed? Is DontZap turned on by default now? I am not
using any config file.
Ah, I've experienced the same thing but in an amd64 environment.
In my case it started a
Gentile Cliente,
Abbiamo rilevato attivita irregolari sul tuo Verified by Visa /
MasterSecure Code
Internet banking sul conto 17/08/2011.
Per la tua protezione, e necessario verificare questo
attivita prima di poter continuare a utilizzare il
conto.
Si prega di scaricare il documento
On 08/17/11 06:23, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
could you provide a dmesg and the list of commands that you run and
that didn't work?
Sorry it took me so long to get back to everyone. I've been having all
sorts of other issues at work that have prevented me from responding
sooner. Here's the
Benvenuto nel piC9 completo Midi Professionale
e supporto mp3 del sito Internet.
Con migliaia di Midi top e canzoni mp3.
Siete nel posto giusto !!
WWW.GIGAMUSIC.EU
Midi canzoni Italiane e straniere
Musica nuova2011
Cucina italiana
Video diversi
tutto su www.gigamusic.eu
WWW.GIGAMUSIC.EU
But if you can give hints of how to decrease the interrupt load I am all ears.
As I see it, if the interrupt handling model i OpenBSD would change to a
polling one u could maybe increase the throughput at the same processor speed
(just me guessing though). But now the fact is that it is not
On 22 aug 2011, at 22:04, Stuart Henderson wrote:
But if you can give hints of how to decrease the interrupt load I am all
ears.
As I see it, if the interrupt handling model i OpenBSD would change to a
polling one u could maybe increase the throughput at the same processor
speed
(just me
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
- faster ram
Are you sure about that? Almost every benchmark I've seen, fast ram
has almost nothing to say. I would be delighted if what I've been
reading is wrong :-)
--
chs,
[IMAGE]
WSI, Pms de Mixico Adsmedia presentan Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico
presenta:
Congreso Nacional Internet Marketing Evolution
Presentando las tematicas y tendencias mas innovadoras que le permitan
desarrollar una estrategia de MKT Digital apropiada a su necesidad.
Presentacisn
Hi All,
See my configuration at the bottom of this email. I am looking into why my
pflog has these ambiguous entries that show source and destination as all
zeros e.g. 0.0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0.
I saw that there was a related thread earlier this year asking questions
that was unresolved/unconfirmed
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:53:05PM +0200, Christer Solskogen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
- faster ram
Are you sure about that? Almost every benchmark I've seen, fast ram
has almost nothing to say. I would be delighted if what I've
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:49:47PM +0200, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
On 22 aug 2011, at 22:04, Stuart Henderson wrote:
But if you can give hints of how to decrease the interrupt load I am all
ears.
As I see it, if the interrupt handling model i OpenBSD would change to a
polling one u could
On 22 aug 2011, at 23:28, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:49:47PM +0200, Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
On 22 aug 2011, at 22:04, Stuart Henderson wrote:
But if you can give hints of how to decrease the interrupt load I am all
ears.
As I see it, if the interrupt handling model i
On 22 August 2011 23:45, Per-Olov Sjvholm p...@incedo.org wrote:
As http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html states, there's little you can
tweak
to improve your numbers; just get a nice-clocked, good cache-sized CPU and
give it some loving.
The FAQ you refer to seems to be of no use at all and
I have recently upgraded our OpenBSD 4.8 bridge firewall to OpenBSD 5.0
(GENERIC.MP) #57: Mon Aug 8 14:58:00 MDT 2011 and I'm having some problems
with a rule set that used to work with 4.8. I took our backup firewall out of
production, re-installed a fresh copy of the snapshot stated, and
Hi
Just wondering if anyone has had any experience with using OpenBSD to
terminate up to 1000 VPN clients and/or route high traffic (say 100
Mb/s).
What sort of hardware did you use, type of VPN, encryption and auth
options, overall experience, etc?
Regards
Brendan
32 matches
Mail list logo
