On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 01:20:49PM +0200, Martin Pelikan wrote:
> 2012/6/29 Matt Hamilton :
> > Does pfsync require firewalls to have the same firewall rules on all
> > hosts in the sync group?
>
> pfsync only synchronizes states. Which rules created them is
> irrelevant.
This absolutely incorrec

© 2012 Conference Corporativo S.C. Asista a los 48 Mejores Cursos en
México de la Serie:NOVEDADES NORMATIVAS en la
ADMINISTRACIÓN PÚBLICA MEXICANA Incluye 4 cursos de ALTO IMPACTO
para el
CIERRE de GESTIÓN 2012:
1) Taller para la Elaboración Puntual de las Memorias Docu
oi, fur-for-brains-man
you said you will never see an email from me ever
because i go directly to /dev/null.
your mama's so fat you cannot even set up procmail.
hmm, on Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 07:20:29AM -0400, Eric Furman said that
> frantisek holop is a shit eating moron who should
> be ignore
Hi TopSuplier69432-WSBE- Please do not delete this line
You show in your Web-Site ARECA items.
Please quote for 1 pcs of ARC1220
Thank you for your cooperation
PS:
We buy stocks, Please send your stock for sale to st...@lti.co.il
Thanks and Regards,
Purchasing Department
Tel. +972-74-71
On Wed 27/06/12 08:32, "Theo de Raadt" dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
> > > I'd prefer the (small) team of developers
> to work on the code.
> >
> > > Well, that's a false dichotomy: not all OpenBSD
> committers work on the
> > code. A handful work pri
what kind of shit are we talking about here? Scheisster baby eat my caviar
turds or sinewy shrimp intestines you have to swallow wholesale lest being
called a fag?
Don't leave this up for interpretation or commentators unaware of Tourette
syndrome tax deductions will /again/ quote out of contex
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 12:36:25PM +0100, Ti Zed wrote:
> Hello,
> recently, i migrated an old pf_old.conf file (OpenBSD 4.4) to the new
> pf_new.conf grammar of OpenBSD 5.0. In the pf_old.conf there is a line with a
> user restriction "user ". As the old manpage of pf.conf states, just
> tcp/udp p
Hi List,
i am using two machines in our network as DHCP servers and want to
synchronise them via the -Y and -y switches. After a while, they get out
of sync and have slight differences in their leasefiles. After
investigating a bit, i activated the sync_debug mode in
/usr/src/usr.sbin/dhcpd/sync.c
2012/6/29 Matt Hamilton :
> Hi All,
>
> Does pfsync require firewalls to have the same firewall rules on all
> hosts in the sync group? May seem an odd thing to ask, but I have a
> situation in which I have two firewalls on different sides of my
> network, each one connected to a different external
frantisek holop is a shit eating moron who should
be ignored by anyone who is not a shit eating moron...
FUCK YOU holop.
FUCK YOU holop.
Please SHUT THE FUCK UP you stupid moron, frantisek holop.
I beg all true @misc followers
Search the archives for this shit eating moron's posts.
He is nothing bu
Hi All,
Does pfsync require firewalls to have the same firewall rules on all
hosts in the sync group? May seem an odd thing to ask, but I have a
situation in which I have two firewalls on different sides of my
network, each one connected to a different external
network. Occasionally due to BGP wei
hmm, on Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:35:41AM +0300, Paul Irofti said that
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:24:46PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > it seems that the Fn key on my netbook is a bit too "eager".
> > it seems to work at first glance all right, fn+volume up/down,
> > fn+brigh
hmm, on Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 01:19:47PM +1000, Sunnz Yiu said that
> On Jun 29, 2012 6:56 AM, "frantisek holop" wrote:
> >
> > hmm, on Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 04:15:56PM -0400, Dave Anderson said that
> > > For dynamic content it's even simpler -- the program producing the
> > > content should also p
Hi!
I'm using a SIL 3512A (BIOS ver. 4.3.79) SATA raid card with two disks
connected to it.
When I'm starting an I/O intensive archive unpacking from wd0 to wd1, I
get DMA errors on the console. If I unpack from wd0 -> wd0, then it
seems fine. I've replaced/switched cables and replaced wd1 too.
I
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:24:46PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> it seems that the Fn key on my netbook is a bit too "eager".
> it seems to work at first glance all right, fn+volume up/down,
> fn+brightness works, though fn+rfkill does not.
This is bugs@ material.
Can you put the
15 matches
Mail list logo