On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, David Higgs wrote:
> To reiterate for personal clarity, section 2 manpages for syscalls
> actually refers to the corresponding libc interfaces? That makes
> sense in that no userland code would be using syscalls directly due to
> complications like errno handling.
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:06 PM, David Higgs wrote:
>> It seems the sigprocmask syscall takes different arguments than the
>> libc stub for sigprocmask(2). Though the differences are easily
>> understood by browsing source, there don't appe
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 09:04:58PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Erling Westenvik
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 10:00:11PM -0500, Francisco Valladolid H. wrote:
> >> I'm currently using a old Thinkpad T61p, good machine and OpenBSD 5.1 work
> >> fine.
> >
> > A
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:06 PM, David Higgs wrote:
> It seems the sigprocmask syscall takes different arguments than the
> libc stub for sigprocmask(2). Though the differences are easily
> understood by browsing source, there don't appear to be any man pages
> describing the syscall interface, an
It seems the sigprocmask syscall takes different arguments than the
libc stub for sigprocmask(2). Though the differences are easily
understood by browsing source, there don't appear to be any man pages
describing the syscall interface, and wonder if this is an intentional
or accidental oversight.
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 10:11:20PM +0200, rustyBSD wrote:
> Hi,
> it's about src/usr.sbin/unbound/ldns/drill/work.c
> at line 184:
>
> What is the 'fp' FILE used for ? Here - if I'm not
> mistaken - we fopen() filename, and that's it. We
> don't use the 'fp' variable, and we never fclose()
> it.
>
Hi,
it's about src/usr.sbin/unbound/ldns/drill/work.c
at line 184:
What is the 'fp' FILE used for ? Here - if I'm not
mistaken - we fopen() filename, and that's it. We
don't use the 'fp' variable, and we never fclose()
it.
Am I wrong ?
Thanks
I use a gen2 Intel ThinkPad X220 (for now) with FreeBSD. When I got it I
tried to install OpenBSD and it worked for a day and I wiped it. I use
FreeBSD because of the KMS support at this time. Battery time is about 1
hour less than on Windows.
If you want guranteed support for almost all devices,
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Erling Westenvik
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 10:00:11PM -0500, Francisco Valladolid H. wrote:
>> I'm currently using a old Thinkpad T61p, good machine and OpenBSD 5.1 work
>> fine.
>
> And I am very satisfied with my ThinkPad T500 (September 2008 model, or
> Au
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 08:46:28PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> And I am very satisfied with my ThinkPad T500 (September 2008 model, or
> August 2009, I'm not sure...) which my nephew gave to me since the
> company he works for considered it outdated. I'm running current and
> everything works
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 10:00:11PM -0500, Francisco Valladolid H. wrote:
> I'm currently using a old Thinkpad T61p, good machine and OpenBSD 5.1 work
> fine.
And I am very satisfied with my ThinkPad T500 (September 2008 model, or
August 2009, I'm not sure...) which my nephew gave to me since the
c
Great!
I'll push my management to place an order.
On 5 okt 2012, at 12:15, OpenBSD Europe wrote:
> We will be making the shipment from Canada soon. If you would like your 5.2
on time we request the orders ASAP :-)
>
> Thanks folks!
Bob Beck wrote:
> We have made available the song that will come out
> with the 5.2 release. The song and details of it are linked
> from:
>
> http://openbsd.org/lyrics.html
>
http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html is more interesting at present.
(it has actual lyrics and commentary)
> Go have
We have made available the song that will come out
with the 5.2 release. The song and details of it are linked
from:
http://openbsd.org/lyrics.html
Go have a look and a listen!
The details for the upcoming 5.2 release are available at
http://www.openbsd.org/52.html
A reminder to you al
> I intend to get my hands on an IPv6 book to deal with some of the issues
> I'm having - which are mainly my lack of knowledge and expertise on the
> subject.
>
> I've seen "IPv6 Essentials", from O'Rilley mentioned a lot, and I've
> heard it has a BSD-related section too.
Probably not what your
Ö£º¹ó¹«Ë¾¸ºÔðÈË£¨²Æ_Îñ£¬¾_Àí£©
ÄãÃǺ㬱¾¹«Ë¾ÏÖÓУ¨½¨Öþ£¬¹ã¸æ£¬·þÎñ£¬ÔËÊ䣬ÉÌÆ·ÏúÊÛ£¬×âÁÞ£©µÈ·¢Àõ´ú¿ª¡£»ú´ò£¬°üÕ棬ÑéÍ긶¿î¡£Èç¹ó¹«Ë¾ÓÐÐèÒª,»¶ÓÀ´µç×Éѯ¡£±¾¹«Ë¾ËùÓÃÀõ¾Ý¾ùΪ¸÷µ¥Î»ÔÚË°Îñ¾ÖËùÉêÁ죬¿ÉÉÏÍø²éѯ»òµ½Ë°Îñ¾ÖµÖ¿ÛÑéÖ¤
ÊÖ»ú£º13590208936 ÕÅС±ø
Hello Misc, Henning,
As a fresh OpenBSD user, i'd like to learn the release
date of new queueing subsystem.
Is there any date on your mind or any updates?
I guess it will be a part of OpenBSD 5.2 or 5.3?
Please forgive my curiosity.
I really want to use new queueing subsystem in production.
Thank
On 6 October 2012 05:55, Artturi Alm wrote:
> I'm not sure what you're exactly trying to do, is it cgi or fastcgi
> you want to use?
Sorry for not being enough clear and thanks for having crystal ball
near you, you
read my intention :)
> i managed to get cgi working with fcgi-cgi, yet i didn't
18 matches
Mail list logo
