Le 2012-10-31 17:30, MERIGHI Marcus a écrit :
I would try in .Xdefaults
XTerm*loginShell:false
OR
you could do the following in .profile:
pgrep -f -x "/usr/X11R6/bin/X .*" || /usr/X11R6/bin/xinit
Hi,
I tried both solutions.
No error messages, but keyboard doesn't work.
Cheers,
Wesley
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 08:49:39PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> After cleaning my spamdb on the first of last month,
> I see that there are 572 WHITE hosts now.
>
> Only a handfull of those are legitimate (my mailserver
> is very low traffic, basically just mail for my family).
You and I have simila
On 11/01/2012 11:12 PM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
On 31/10/2012 18:49, Kaya Saman wrote:
I've just got my dsl line reprovisioned for Annex M compatibility and
the line speed showing currently on the modem is 20Mbps downstream with
2Mbps upstream.
Upon the reprovisioning I got ask to do a speed
OpenBSD 5.1 / i386, two boxes connected using CARP/pfsync. There are
VLANs on the physical interfaces, and CARP interfaces on the VLAN
interfaces. Both boxes run dual stack on VLAN and CARP interfaces. This
all works fine.
To get rid of multicast CARP traffic, I tried using the carppeer keyword
in
On 31/10/2012 18:49, Kaya Saman wrote:
I've just got my dsl line reprovisioned for Annex M compatibility and
the line speed showing currently on the modem is 20Mbps downstream with
2Mbps upstream.
Upon the reprovisioning I got ask to do a speed test by my ISP and only
~>5Mbps was shown for down
On 1 November 2012 12:49, Jan Stary wrote:
> Here is a typical host:
> WHITE|2.139.201.210|||1351517497|1351518564|1354630766|2|1
> which is 210.red-2-139-201.staticip.rima-tde.net.
> It tried to connect at Mon Oct 29 14:31:37 CET 2012,
> and got WHITE at Mon Oct 29 14:49:24 CET 2012.
>
> It is ob
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:49:39 +0100
Jan Stary wrote:
> After cleaning my spamdb on the first of last month,
> I see that there are 572 WHITE hosts now.
>
> Only a handfull of those are legitimate (my mailserver
> is very low traffic, basically just mail for my family).
>
> Looking at the logs, I
Thus said Joakim Aronius on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:54:28 BST:
> !!spamd
> daemon.err;daemon.warn;daemon.info /var/log/spamd
> daemon.err;daemon.warn;daemon.info @logserver
A careful reading of man syslog.conf would seem to indicate that you can
do something
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:34:50AM +0100, Anders Trob?ck wrote:
>> Den Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:11:26 +
>> skrev Jamie Paul Griffin :
>>
>> > / Tyler Morgan wrote on Wed 31.Oct'12 at 20:04:11 -0700 /
>> >
>> > > Don't do it! Seriously, the upgrade process is easy, and is worth
>> > > becoming fami
Hi,
I had this pf rules
int_if = "trunk1"
cosmo = 172.16.99.249
pass in on $int_if from to ! route-to $cosmo@$int_if
However, when I issue a pfctl -sr, I get
pass in on trunk1 inet from to ! flags S/SA route-to
172.16.99.249@$int_if
Shouldn't this @$int_if be translated to trunk1 ?
Is th
Jan Stary wrote:
Strangely, the only occurence of 2.139.201.210 in the last month's
maillog is just this; that's half an hour after it got WHITE.
What happend at Mon Oct 29 14:49:24 CET 2012 that made it WHITE?
Anyway, it seems (some) spambots got less demented and actually do
resend, getting
After cleaning my spamdb on the first of last month,
I see that there are 572 WHITE hosts now.
Only a handfull of those are legitimate (my mailserver
is very low traffic, basically just mail for my family).
Looking at the logs, I see that most of them got themselves
whitelisted by actually resend
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for your response. I've also been using this legacy format, but when
I tried the new format, pfctl didn't complain, but didn't apply it.
sperreault@ confirmed this is a known issue, and will be addressed in time.
Thanks for you attention.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Pat
Le Thu, 1 Nov 2012 13:28:18 -0200,
Fernando Braga a écrit :
Hello,
> pass in on $int_if from to ! route-to
> $cosmo@$int_if
>
> However, when I issue a pfctl -sr, I get
>
> pass in on trunk1 inet from to ! flags S/SA
> route-to 172.16.99.249@$int_if
>
> Shouldn't this @$int_if be translat
Hi,
A quick question on syslog to remote servers.. I would like to log my spamd
logs localy and to a remote server, first I tried to ad a second row to
syslog.conf pointing at the logserver:
!!spamd
daemon.err;daemon.warn;daemon.info /var/log/spamd
daemon.err;daemon.warn;da
the syntax should be like this:
pass in on $int_if from to ! route-to ($int_if $cosmo)
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Fernando Braga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had this pf rules
>
> int_if = "trunk1"
> cosmo = 172.16.99.249
>
> pass in on $int_if from to ! route-to $cosmo@$int_if
>
> However, when I
November 1, 2012.
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 5.2.
This is our 32nd release on CD-ROM (and 33rd via FTP). We remain
proud of OpenBSD's record of more than ten years with only two remote
holes i
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 08:11:26AM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> / Tyler Morgan wrote on Wed 31.Oct'12 at 20:04:11 -0700 /
>
> > Don't do it! Seriously, the upgrade process is easy, and is worth
> > becoming familiar with. At least give it a shot since you're
> > planning on reinstalling anyw
*I am trying to get torrenting to work but I can't seem to get any packets
to go through. Tcpdump shows attempted activity and nothing blocked,but the
torrent client itself doesn't seem to be receiving anything from any
torrent I have tried.
The torrent client is using port 58846
>From the pf.conf
Hi,
I had this pf rules
int_if = "trunk1"
cosmo = 172.16.99.249
pass in on $int_if from to ! route-to $cosmo@$int_if
However, when I issue a pfctl -sr, I get
pass in on trunk1 inet from to ! flags S/SA route-to
172.16.99.249@$int_if
Shouldn't this @$int_if be translated to trunk1 ?
Is th
On Apr 14 19:48:24, mcmer-open...@tor.at wrote:
> hello (opensmtpd-) folks,
>
> I think OpenSMTPd aborts delivery to multiple aliased recipients as soon
> as a delivery attempt returns non-zero.
> I consider this unwanted: a super user defined delivery list in
> aliases(5) is not applied if some
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
untarring the sets and copying the kernel by hand is not recommended.
I used the perfect phrase for this in a presentation on PF a week ago:
"You wouldn't ever do this... unless maybe you hate yourself."
--Kurt
/ Anders Trobäck wrote on Thu 1.Nov'12 at 9:40:43 +0100 /
> Den Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:34:50 +0100
> skrev Anders Trobäck :
>
> > Den Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:11:26 +
> > skrev Jamie Paul Griffin :
> >
> > > / Tyler Morgan wrote on Wed 31.Oct'12 at 20:04:11 -0700 /
> > >
> > > > Don't do it! Seriou
> > > Don't do it! Seriously, the upgrade process is easy, and is worth
> > > becoming familiar with. At least give it a shot since you're
> > > planning on reinstalling anyway. I think you'll be pleasantly
> > > surprised!
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, do you think the easiest method is to use
Hi,
I saw this today on my firewall:
Nov 01 12:51:10.857175 rule def/(short) pass in on vlanxxx:
74.206.235.92.0 > xx.xx.xx.xx.0: FPE [bad hdr length] (DF)
Nov 01 12:51:12.724286 rule def/(short) pass in on vlanxxx:
74.206.235.92.0 > xx.xx.xx.xx.0: FPE 1137099714:1137099726(12) ack 0 win
6667
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:34:50AM +0100, Anders Trob?ck wrote:
> Den Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:11:26 +
> skrev Jamie Paul Griffin :
>
> > / Tyler Morgan wrote on Wed 31.Oct'12 at 20:04:11 -0700 /
> >
> > > Don't do it! Seriously, the upgrade process is easy, and is worth
> > > becoming familiar wi
Den Thu, 1 Nov 2012 09:34:50 +0100
skrev Anders Trobäck :
> Den Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:11:26 +
> skrev Jamie Paul Griffin :
>
> > / Tyler Morgan wrote on Wed 31.Oct'12 at 20:04:11 -0700 /
> >
> > > Don't do it! Seriously, the upgrade process is easy, and is worth
> > > becoming familiar with. At
Den Thu, 1 Nov 2012 08:11:26 +
skrev Jamie Paul Griffin :
> / Tyler Morgan wrote on Wed 31.Oct'12 at 20:04:11 -0700 /
>
> > Don't do it! Seriously, the upgrade process is easy, and is worth
> > becoming familiar with. At least give it a shot since you're
> > planning on reinstalling anyway. I
/ Tyler Morgan wrote on Wed 31.Oct'12 at 20:04:11 -0700 /
> Don't do it! Seriously, the upgrade process is easy, and is worth
> becoming familiar with. At least give it a shot since you're
> planning on reinstalling anyway. I think you'll be pleasantly
> surprised!
Just out of curiosity, do you t
/ Tyler Morgan wrote on Wed 31.Oct'12 at 20:04:11 -0700 /
> Don't do it! Seriously, the upgrade process is easy, and is worth
> becoming familiar with. At least give it a shot since you're
> planning on reinstalling anyway. I think you'll be pleasantly
> surprised!
>
> For a long time I did fre
30 matches
Mail list logo
