Le 01/12/2012 22:31, Philip Guenther a écrit :
> Neither. The OpenBSD developers think that that's a useless** warning
> and aren't interested in making the system header files that much
> harder to read just to make it go away.
>
> What problem are you trying to solve by using -Wredundant-decls?
Am Montag, 3. Dezember 2012 schrieb InterNetX - Carsten Schoene :
> Hello,
>
> i've setup a OpenBSD 5.2 (amd64) system using flashrd on a DELL R610
> server,
> with an Intel PRO/1000 PF (82571EB) dualport fibre optics adapter.
> The system also have four broadcom BCM5709 copper interfaces.
>
> I t
indeed. Looks like the mixed it up. As long as I get the 'current' log I'll
send it to the list.
Thanks
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Sebastian Reitenbach <
sebas...@l00-bugdead-prods.de> wrote:
>
> Am Montag, 03. Dezember 2012 17:57 CET, Tony Berth <
> tonybe...@googlemail.com> schrieb:
>
> >
2012/12/3 Tony Berth :
> it is the current one (2012-12-02)
Well, this is actual snapshot:
> OpenBSD 5.2-current (RAMDISK_CD) #86 Sun Dec 2 13:59:04 MST 2012
--
Michał Markowski
On 12/03/12 20:56, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> PS. According to Wikipedia UNIX is a multitasking, _multiuser_
>> computer operating system, so it turns out that the loss of ability
>> to run multiple startx/xinit sessions is equivalent to the loss
>> of the essential UNIX feature- _multiuser_ support:(
Am Montag, 03. Dezember 2012 17:57 CET, Tony Berth
schrieb:
> it is the current one (2012-12-02)
> > OpenBSD 5.2 (RAMDISK_CD) #287: Wed Aug 1 10:19:00 MDT 2012
> > der...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD
but dmesg says its not so current like you think it is.
it is the current one (2012-12-02)
Thanks
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 06:08:34PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
> > here is the installation dmesg when trying to install the 5.2 i386
> snapshot:
>
> And the installation dmesg from a -current s
> PS. According to Wikipedia UNIX is a multitasking, _multiuser_
> computer operating system, so it turns out that the loss of ability
> to run multiple startx/xinit sessions is equivalent to the loss
> of the essential UNIX feature- _multiuser_ support:(
You have this very wrong.
The problem is
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 06:08:34PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
> here is the installation dmesg when trying to install the 5.2 i386 snapshot:
And the installation dmesg from a -current snapshot would be even
more useful.
Ken
>
> -
> LSI Logic Corp. MPT IME BIOS
> Copyright 1995-2005 LSI
On 12/03/12 16:29, Laurence Tratt wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:53:44PM +0400, Alexei Malinin wrote:
>
>> Indeed, I ran two X servers at the same time a long time ago.
>> But from time to time I have a need to do so (that is, to run one more X
>> session on behalf of another person, without d
here is the installation dmesg when trying to install the 5.2 i386 snapshot:
-
LSI Logic Corp. MPT IME BIOS
Copyright 1995-2005 LSI Logic Corp.
MPTBIOS-IME-5.13.08
CD-ROM: 9F
Loading /5.2/I386/CDBOOT
probing: pc0 apm pci mem[616K 2046M a20=on]
disk: hd0+* cd0
>> OpenBSD/i386 CDBOOT 3.17
boot
Hello,
i've setup a OpenBSD 5.2 (amd64) system using flashrd on a DELL R610 server,
with an Intel PRO/1000 PF (82571EB) dualport fibre optics adapter.
The system also have four broadcom BCM5709 copper interfaces.
I try to monitor the linkstate of these interface using the default
snmpd. The links
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:53:44PM +0400, Alexei Malinin wrote:
> Indeed, I ran two X servers at the same time a long time ago.
> But from time to time I have a need to do so (that is, to run one more X
> session on behalf of another person, without destroyingmy active X
> session)...
I sometimes
On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 08:53:53PM -0800, Robert Connolly wrote:
> Hello.
>
> In an effort to isolate Firefox (or any graphical browser) from my
> user account, I have added a 'firefox' user and group, added
> 'firefox' user to sshd_config to allow x11 forwarding, and ran the
> following commands:
14 matches
Mail list logo