On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 06:28:05PM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
| @ajacoutot You should definitely review your approach to user
| support.
It's so funny: I thought the exact same thing!
Why in the name of FUCK did this guy continue to offer support to
someone who doesn't even have the common d
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 06:28:05PM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
> @ajacoutot You should definitely review your approach to user
Oh really? You think so.
Then wire me some money then we'll talk how I can improve support.
> support. You obviously run -current but not everyone do and not
I run -
Le 2013-02-20 15:52, Philippe Grégoire a écrit :
Le 2013-02-20 12:51, Antoine Jacoutot a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:46:27PM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
Anyway:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/devel/libvmime/Makefile.diff?r1=1.13;r2=1.14;f=h
Thanks.
The diff shows the
On 2013-02-20, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:35:59PM +0300, Aaron Glenn wrote:
>> I'm wondering if any one is thinking/contemplating/attempting
>> implementing the newly release EIGRP draft from Cisco.
>> No, I don't have patches to contribute...this is just a simple "anyone
>>
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Jan Stary wrote:
>
>
> > I tried running
> > "newfs -i"with different values and settled on "newfs -i 1 /var/www"
> > as it seemed at the time to makes the make the most inodes and that
> > was just based on how much output was generated while newfs was
> > running
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:41:20 -0600, patrick keshishian
wrote:
Privilege vs right discussions are way too off topic here. That said,
you are falsely assuming people with government endorsed licenses "do
the right thing". Get serious.
Licensed drivers aren't perfect but they do have to maste
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:18:54 -0600, Matthias Appel
> wrote:
>
>> If I buy a car, and don't know how to operate it, and cause harm, nobody
>> would blame the manufacturer.
>
>
> You of course need a license / permit to operate that car legally.
If you're just testing, why don't you quit pestering Antoine and try a
snapshot. 5.3 is just around the corner. By the time you have zarafa
tested, you will be able to upgrade today's snapshot to 5.3-release
and call it good.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Philippe Grégoire
wrote:
> Le 2013-02
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:18:54 -0600, Matthias Appel
wrote:
If I buy a car, and don't know how to operate it, and cause harm, nobody
would blame the manufacturer.
You of course need a license / permit to operate that car legally. That
process also teaches you how to use it safely. Nobody i
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:35:59PM +0300, Aaron Glenn wrote:
> I'm wondering if any one is thinking/contemplating/attempting
> implementing the newly release EIGRP draft from Cisco.
> No, I don't have patches to contribute...this is just a simple "anyone
> else thinking about this?" message. feel f
On Feb 20 20:58:49, ke...@scott-land.net wrote:
> On 20/02/2013 07:36, Jan Stary wrote:
> >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 00:35, Keith wrote:
> >>>Q. How do I make the default web folder /var/www/ capable of holding
> >>>millions of files (say 50GB worth of small 2kb-12kb files) so that I
> >>>won't get
Just used it, works fine and is easy to remember.
El miércoles, 20 de febrero de 2013, Constantine A. Murenin escribió:
> Dear misc, www,
>
> I would like to announce and introduce http://mdoc.su/>, a
> deterministic URL shortener for BSD manual pages, written entirely in
> nginx.conf.
>
> It sup
Le 2013-02-20 12:51, Antoine Jacoutot a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:46:27PM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
Anyway:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/devel/libvmime/Makefile.diff?r1=1.13;r2=1.14;f=h
Thanks.
The diff shows the revision was prior to 5.2 but it seems it wasn't
On 20/02/2013 07:36, Jan Stary wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 00:35, Keith wrote:
Q. How do I make the default web folder /var/www/ capable of holding
millions of files (say 50GB worth of small 2kb-12kb files) so that I
won't get inode issues ?
newfs defaults to -f 2k and -b 16k which is fine i
Dear misc, www,
I would like to announce and introduce http://mdoc.su/>,
a deterministic URL shortener for BSD manual pages,
written entirely in nginx.conf.
It supports several addressing schemes, for example:
http://mdoc.su/o/pf
http://mdoc.su/o/pf.4
http://mdoc.su/o/4/pf
http://mdoc.su
Le 2013-02-20 12:17, Antoine Jacoutot a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:13:00PM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
Le 2013-02-20 11:56, Antoine Jacoutot a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:48:10AM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
Le 2013-02-20 02:44, Antoine Jacoutot a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 19,
Le 2013-02-20 11:56, Antoine Jacoutot a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:48:10AM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
Le 2013-02-20 02:44, Antoine Jacoutot a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 08:55:39PM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to check the possibilities with Zarafa and inst
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:46:27PM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
> >Anyway:
> >http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/devel/libvmime/Makefile.diff?r1=1.13;r2=1.14;f=h
>
> Thanks.
>
> The diff shows the revision was prior to 5.2 but it seems it wasn't
No, it's been made after 5.2 was tagge
Le 2013-02-20 02:44, Antoine Jacoutot a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 08:55:39PM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to check the possibilities with Zarafa and installed
OpenBSD 5.2 on an empty machine. Sadly, I spent the last hours
trying to figure out the cause of the following
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:13:00PM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
> Le 2013-02-20 11:56, Antoine Jacoutot a écrit :
> >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:48:10AM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
> >>Le 2013-02-20 02:44, Antoine Jacoutot a écrit :
> >>>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 08:55:39PM -0500, Philippe Grég
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:48:10AM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
> Le 2013-02-20 02:44, Antoine Jacoutot a écrit :
> >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 08:55:39PM -0500, Philippe Grégoire wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I am trying to check the possibilities with Zarafa and installed
> >>OpenBSD 5.2 on an empty ma
Am 20.02.2013 09:21, schrieb Jiri B:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32:02AM +0100, Matthias Appel wrote:
And by talking of ZFS, why not consider
ext3/4,reiser,xfs,jfs,ntfs,whatever-fs to be ported to OpenBSD?
Where are the diffs? For example real improvement would be FAT/NTFS
speed on OpenBSD, as i
I'm wondering if any one is thinking/contemplating/attempting
implementing the newly release EIGRP draft from Cisco.
No, I don't have patches to contribute...this is just a simple "anyone
else thinking about this?" message. feel free to contact me privately
if this is too noisy a message (hah...mis
I suspect the application described here should not use a filesystem,
probably a database will be better for the aim. However, assuming it
is not possible to fix/change the application behavior, I guess using
several filesystems/mount points will help. While ZFS (and many
others) will be good at ha
Jiri B writes:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32:02AM +0100, Matthias Appel wrote:
>> And by talking of ZFS, why not consider
>> ext3/4,reiser,xfs,jfs,ntfs,whatever-fs to be ported to OpenBSD?
>
> Where are the diffs? For example real improvement would be FAT/NTFS
> speed on OpenBSD, as it is much
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32:02AM +0100, Matthias Appel wrote:
> And by talking of ZFS, why not consider
> ext3/4,reiser,xfs,jfs,ntfs,whatever-fs to be ported to OpenBSD?
Where are the diffs? For example real improvement would be FAT/NTFS
speed on OpenBSD, as it is much much slower than on Linux.
26 matches
Mail list logo