On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
wrote:
> Theo de Raadt writes:
> [...]
>> The 5th word in your original email is "we", and what you really mean
>> to use there is the plural "you".
>
> Is that a new theo.c entry?
+1
wait wait ~
can someone comment on this
http://www.daemonology.net/hyperthreading-considered-harmful/ ?
is it still in vogue?
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:31 AM, David Ruggiero
wrote:
>>> "The OpenBSD kernel and network stack still do run only on CPU0, so if
> all you plan to do is
>>> use PF to
>> "The OpenBSD kernel and network stack still do run only on CPU0, so if
all you plan to do is
>> use PF to filter traffic, then you are indeed better off disabling HTT."
Thanks. That's the piece of info I needed, as (at least per current plans)
95% of the machine's time will be in PF-land, wi
On 7 Mar 2013 at 20:24, David Ruggiero wrote:
> I've been using OpenBsd for 8+ years on my main router/firewall (4
> NICs).
> Time to upgrade (I'm back on v3.8, yikes). Past time, really.
> Solots to
> learn / re-learn here. Have patience. First question:
>
> I'll be loading 5.2 on a low-pow
I've been using OpenBsd for 8+ years on my main router/firewall (4 NICs).
Time to upgrade (I'm back on v3.8, yikes). Past time, really. Solots to
learn / re-learn here. Have patience. First question:
I'll be loading 5.2 on a low-power, Atom E640-based box (the Soekris
net6501). That chip has
Theo de Raadt writes:
[...]
> The 5th word in your original email is "we", and what you really mean
> to use there is the plural "you".
Is that a new theo.c entry?
--
Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
GPG Key fingerprint: 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494
Here is my output of lsusb -v, hope it helps
Bus 000 Device 001: ID 8086: Intel Corp.
Device Descriptor:
bLength18
bDescriptorType 1
bcdUSB 2.00
bDeviceClass9 Hub
bDeviceSubClass 0 Unused
bDeviceProtocol 1 Single TT
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:23:41AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > I was thinking that if we would move part in the installer which let the
> > > user
> > > locate installation sets right after setting networking, we could
> > > introduce
> > > some install.site alternative which could feed i
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:23:41AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > I was thinking that if we would move part in the installer which let the
> > user
> > locate installation sets right after setting networking, we could introduce
> > some install.site alternative which could feed installer with con
This works. Thank you very much. I'll let you know if I run into any issues
but I am able to run snort inline now along with NAT.
Justin
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence Teo [mailto:l...@openbsd.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 8:55 AM
To: Justin Mayes
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject
FYI
This patch has corrected my issues with snort inline and NAT
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=136245826921904&w=2
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Justin Mayes
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 3:10 PM
To: misc@openb
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:19:22PM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking that if we would move part in the installer which let the user
> locate installation sets right after setting networking, we could introduce
> some install.site alternative which could feed installer with configuratio
> I was thinking that if we would move part in the installer which let the user
> locate installation sets right after setting networking, we could introduce
> some install.site alternative which could feed installer with configuration
> for setting disks etc...
>
> Or is there any (semi)official i
Hi,
I was thinking that if we would move part in the installer which let the user
locate installation sets right after setting networking, we could introduce
some install.site alternative which could feed installer with configuration
for setting disks etc...
Or is there any (semi)official idea ho
Hi,
I've having trouble configuring multiple areas in ospfd.
System is current.
If I put vlan12 interface in area 0.0.0.7, then vlan12:network is not
announced at all.
If I put it on area 0.0.0.0 then it is announced, but I don't see it as
inter area in remote routers.
How can I add it in ar
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:32:59 +
James Griffin wrote:
> Hi
>
> My desktop is a Lenovo Think centre, and i' stuck a logitech hd 720p
> webcam in it. I wondered if anyone has had success with these - do
> they work on OpenBSD and what packages might I need/consider to use
> it.
>
> I ran sudo fw
Hi
My desktop is a Lenovo Think centre, and i' stuck a logitech hd 720p
webcam in it. I wondered if anyone has had success with these - do they
work on OpenBSD and what packages might I need/consider to use it.
I ran sudo fw_update and it installed uvideo-firmware-1.2p0. The webcam
has a built-in
Yes, it's much better.
I currently have several 5.2-current (post 5.2-rel ) machines with em(4)
without any problems regarding em(4).
5.0 is EOL.
On 7 mar 2013, at 13:09, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:10:08PM +0100, mxb wrote:
>> What about 5.2? Same issues?
>
>
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:10:08PM +0100, mxb wrote:
> What about 5.2? Same issues?
Even better, what about -current or 5.3 snaps?
Ken
On 03/07/2013 01:10 PM, mxb wrote:
What about 5.2? Same issues?
//mxb
I don't know.
This is remote host1 and it holds IPSec with another host2.
When issue come - network behind host2 can't reach resources
behind host1.
What about 5.2? Same issues?
//mxb
On 7 mar 2013, at 11:36, lilit-aibolit wrote:
> On 11/09/2011 10:27 PM, Jussi Peltola wrote:
>> You can ignore the clueless parts in my previous message :)
>>
>> I can set up remote access to one of these machines if needed.
>>
>> This made the ems work agai
On 11/09/2011 10:27 PM, Jussi Peltola wrote:
You can ignore the clueless parts in my previous message :)
I can set up remote access to one of these machines if needed.
This made the ems work again:
--- if_em.c.origWed Nov 9 21:37:39 2011
+++ if_em.c Wed Nov 9 21:39:01 2011
@@ -33
On 03/04/2013 10:17 PM, Martin Pelikan wrote:
Hello. Thanks for your reply.
I need to guaranty bandwidth for selected host (abu, ali) and
pass all other traffic to bulk queue, but I have a lot of filter rules
and don't know how to do it. I have applied queues to some pass rules
and lost connectio
it's not relevant because these aren't stand alone gpus...
here in venezuela they're still selling clarkdales... i know because i
just bought two. can someone else in a developing country offer their
observations?
i don't see the need to upgrade to sandy bridge ++ because my system
can handle 108
24 matches
Mail list logo