mixing ports and non-ports programs

2013-04-13 Thread Alan Corey
I'm not sure how to look this up, and it doesn't seem to be in the FAQ. I frequently add stuff that isn't in ports by building from sources. Sometimes this real world stuff needs newer versions of other things than what's in ports. But the port is already installed and has things depending on it.

Re: FAQ - Disk Imaging

2013-04-13 Thread Nick Holland
On 04/13/13 19:27, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > 4.15 of the faq says > > Unfortunately, there are no known disk imaging packages which are > FFS-aware. > > I haven't tested ... Get back with me when you have. I'll be happy to find out that statement is now wrong, but I've been doing this about 20 ye

Re: match and nat-to

2013-04-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-04-13, Chris Smith wrote: > Looking for a bit of clarification on match and nat-to. At one point > (and maybe still so?) nat rules were "first matching" as opposed to > the 'normal' case of "last matching" but match rules are sticky until > overridden. > > With: > match out on $ext_if inet

FAQ - Disk Imaging

2013-04-13 Thread Kevin Chadwick
4.15 of the faq says Unfortunately, there are no known disk imaging packages which are FFS-aware. I haven't tested whether a broad brush had been applied expecting ufs and ffs to be the same or if clonezillas statement is correct but thought it may be worth bringing up that clonezilla.org says F

Re: usleep() buffer update

2013-04-13 Thread Matthew Dempsky
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Mihai Popescu wrote: > Can someone give me some hints in this direction, please, what exactly > triggers usleep() internaly ? usleep() doesn't trigger anything, but usleep(1) doesn't mean "sleep exactly 1us", it means "sleep at least 1us". In practice, your proce

usleep() buffer update

2013-04-13 Thread Mihai Popescu
Hello, This is a question about OS behaviour which I can't find the answer for. I am using the serial port as /dev/cua00 set up for non blocking and no bytes count or timeout. Basicaly I send 5 bytes and after each one the connected device sends one back, so there are 5 bytes as a response. write

match and nat-to

2013-04-13 Thread Chris Smith
Looking for a bit of clarification on match and nat-to. At one point (and maybe still so?) nat rules were "first matching" as opposed to the 'normal' case of "last matching" but match rules are sticky until overridden. With: match out on $ext_if inet from !($ext_if) to any nat-to ($ext_if) match o

Re: ospfd loopback advertisment failure (adjacency fail?)

2013-04-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-04-13, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: > On 13.4.2013. 17:29, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> ospfd doesn't support point-to-point on ethernet interfaces, you will >> need to remove this from cisco config for now. >> >> might not be too hard to add though.. (as in, I have a diff which builds, >> but I

Re: snmpd, oid and scripts

2013-04-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-04-11, Joel Carnat wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to get rid of net-snmp and use the shipped snmpd(8). > I have OpenBSD boxes running various services (DNS, Web, Mail...) and have > scripts providing service stats using the extend/exec net-snmp feature. I > read about the "oid" feature of snm

Re: order site down?

2013-04-13 Thread Nicolai
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 02:31:03PM +0800, Alan Cheng wrote: > I got "500 internal error" too. Same here. The following page has a list of vendors which sell CD sets and/or other OpenBSD stuff. The main site in Canada, which is having issues, is only one of them. http://www.openbsd.org/orders

Re:

2013-04-13 Thread Nick Holland
On 04/13/13 07:52, Jan Stary wrote: > Going over the X FAQ, I see > > 11.1.1 - How much computer do I need to run X? > > > While "How much computer" is slightly amusing, > was it meant to be "how much computer power" > or something? > > Jan > It was mea

Re: ospfd loopback advertisment failure (adjacency fail?)

2013-04-13 Thread Hrvoje Popovski
On 13.4.2013. 17:29, Stuart Henderson wrote: > ospfd doesn't support point-to-point on ethernet interfaces, you will > need to remove this from cisco config for now. > > might not be too hard to add though.. (as in, I have a diff which builds, > but I have no idea if it works ;-) > could you pos

Re: php e kerberos

2013-04-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-04-12, Rémi Bougard wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 01:06:30PM -0300, Friedrich Locke wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> i am running OBSD 5.2 and i would like to try to connect to a kerberos >> server using php. >> >> In the following link http://www.php.net/manual/en/book.kadm5.php in

Re: userland pppoe unusable/slow/dropping packets

2013-04-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-04-12, Adam wrote: > Trying to use userland pppoe for a DSL connection, I connect fine, and I > can pass small amounts of traffic through the link without issues. But as > soon as I send real traffic through it (a couple hundred Kb/sec of pretty > ordinary DNS and HTTP traffic) late

Re: ospfd loopback advertisment failure (adjacency fail?)

2013-04-13 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013-04-12, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote: > > I think most probably the problem is in the network type (BROADCAST vs > P2P in Cisco). Is there some way to declare em3 as point-to-point in > ospfd or do I just need to remove > > ip ospf network point-to-point > > from the cisco interface config? o

Re: php e kerberos

2013-04-13 Thread Rémi Bougard
Hi, On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 01:06:30PM -0300, Friedrich Locke wrote: > Hi folks, > > i am running OBSD 5.2 and i would like to try to connect to a kerberos > server using php. > > In the following link http://www.php.net/manual/en/book.kadm5.php in the > requirement section it is stated : > >

[no subject]

2013-04-13 Thread Jan Stary
Going over the X FAQ, I see 11.1.1 - How much computer do I need to run X? While "How much computer" is slightly amusing, was it meant to be "how much computer power" or something? Jan

iked: What is missing?

2013-04-13 Thread Matthias Vey
Hello misc, I want to use iked but the manpage says it is not ready to use and some important things are missing. What parts are missing and is it still not safe at all or only under special circumstances? Thanks Matt

Re: sendmail config [solved]

2013-04-13 Thread Tony Berth
Thanks for all the prompt replies. The MUA is indeed the place to do the modifications. Just for the records, in SqurrelMail I had to modify the file 'class/deliver/Deliver.class.php' Tony On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:06 AM, James Griffin wrote: > Fri 12.Apr'13 at 9:27:14 +0300 T