On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Roger Hammerstein wrote:
> i had another machine panic with this, and no disk errors.amd64, openbsd 5.3.
...
> ddb{0}> show panic
> softdep_deallocate_dependencies: unrecovered I/O error
> ddb{0}> trace
> Debugger() at Debugger+0x5
> panic() at panic+0xe4
> softdep
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 08:42:21PM -0400, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> I don't like this diff.
>
> >
> > But perhaps because I totally hate that the installer is placing that
> > name there. I believe that dynamically learned names should not be
> > saved in that fashion.
> >
> >
>
> I don't really
I don't like this diff.
>
> But perhaps because I totally hate that the installer is placing that
> name there. I believe that dynamically learned names should not be
> saved in that fashion.
>
>
I don't really get a vote as i'm not a developer, however cookies to anyone
who fixes this the corre
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:11, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> > Bug was catched by fsfuzzer. Probably that bug cannot be
> > found in real life with real usecase, but anyway it is a bug.
>
> Sorry, but I don't think these bugs are interesting. The filesystem
> code panics when it encounters a broken
> On Jul 20 22:14:52, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > I believe I have bitched about this before,
> > but I have come to it again with new install.
> >
> > If I use [dhcp] to configure an interface during an install,
> > the ephemeral DHCP-assigned address gets written into /etc/hosts.
> >
> > That addr
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 08:23:35PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Jul 20 11:23:01, kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:45:07AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > > What troubles me is that whatever device (device name) I try,
> > > > it is the 'ofwboot' which is not found.
> > > >
On Jul 20 22:14:52, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> I believe I have bitched about this before,
> but I have come to it again with new install.
>
> If I use [dhcp] to configure an interface during an install,
> the ephemeral DHCP-assigned address gets written into /etc/hosts.
>
> That address is meaningle
I believe I have bitched about this before,
but I have come to it again with new install.
If I use [dhcp] to configure an interface during an install,
the ephemeral DHCP-assigned address gets written into /etc/hosts.
That address is meaningless after the reboot, possibly even
conflicting when I l
> I made the DOS partition start at 512 (and then 1024
> and then everything under 4096 wherethe obsd part starts),
> but never could I mount that DOS partition ...
Silly me, it's 1, not 512;
and it mounts, and the ofwboot is NOT there,
and not in the wd0i as designated by me either.
So there is n
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:11, Sergey Bronnikov wrote:
> Bug was catched by fsfuzzer. Probably that bug cannot be
> found in real life with real usecase, but anyway it is a bug.
Sorry, but I don't think these bugs are interesting. The filesystem
code panics when it encounters a broken filesystem.
On 20. juli 2013 at 5:34 PM, "Jan Stary" wrote:
>
>Why are you building the (huge) port,
>instead of simply installing the package?
Whoa. When did that get there? Thanks man!
O.D.
On Jul 20 11:23:01, kwesterb...@rogers.com wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:45:07AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > What troubles me is that whatever device (device name) I try,
> > > it is the 'ofwboot' which is not found.
> > > I don't mind calling my disk 'cd' in the boot sequence
> > > or alte
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:45:07AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > What troubles me is that whatever device (device name) I try,
> > it is the 'ofwboot' which is not found.
> > I don't mind calling my disk 'cd' in the boot sequence
> > or altering the devaliases, or "setenv boot-device cd:,ofwboot",
>
On 20. juli 2013 at 3:54 PM, "Amit Kulkarni" wrote:
>>
>> Nope, plenty of disk space left in /usr/local (my ports are in
>> /usr/local/ports).
>
>why are ports inside /usr/local. it should be /usr/ports. Some
>ports may fail.
Maybe, yeah. I updated PORTSDIR in /etc/mk.conf though. Anyway I just
On 19. juli 2013 at 9:13 PM, "Miod Vallat" wrote:
>
>> Pretty sure it takes more than 1.7G to build Java.
>
>But then how can java people pretend it has any usefulness, besides
>filing disks?
They say Android apps are just an excuse for Java devs to keep programming in
Java. Now that HTML5 can a
> What troubles me is that whatever device (device name) I try,
> it is the 'ofwboot' which is not found.
> I don't mind calling my disk 'cd' in the boot sequence
> or altering the devaliases, or "setenv boot-device cd:,ofwboot",
> but that doesn't work either, as shown above.
> How can I make sure
The saga continues: I tried to reinstall with 5.4-beta,
and have a similar, but different problem now.
To recall the previous situation: the kernel was
confused about what 'cd0' and 'hd0' is, and I had
to hardcode the bootpath into the kernel config.
A patch from mpieuc...@nolizard.org solved it f
On Mar 28 12:52:46, s.casw...@protocol6.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I had a question about greylisting (with spamd) in production.
>
> I've successfully run spamd on firewalls (as a frontend to either barracuda
> or SpamAssassin) and have really liked the reduction in SPAM volume.
>
> Unfortunatel
18 matches
Mail list logo
