Em 06-06-2014 22:11, patric conant escreveu:
So we knew that OpenSSL had some problems, indicated by the fact that they
were blissfully unaware that Valgrind gave warnings when compiling their
code, from the Debian debacle.
They knew, just didn't care.
Then Heartbleed came along, and people
Em 07-06-2014 00:04, Solar Designer escreveu:
tools and ethics are separate things
It seems like you got to the real issue now.
Cheers,
--
Giancarlo Razzolini
GPG: 4096R/77B981BC
On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 07:04:47 +0400
Solar Designer so...@openwall.com wrote:
To clarify and for the record:
Being on the distros list is not mandatory to receive advance
notification of security issues. The list is just a tool. People
reporting security issues to the distros list are
Le 07/06/2014 05:41, Eric Furman a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014, at 07:28 AM, Maxime Villard wrote:
Le 06/06/2014 12:47, Eric Furman a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014, at 04:20 AM, Renaud Allard wrote:
On 06/06/2014 05:18 AM, Eric Furman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014, at 08:36 PM, Giancarlo
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 09:13:36AM +0200, Francois Ambrosini wrote:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 07:04:47 +0400
Solar Designer so...@openwall.com wrote:
Being on the distros list is not mandatory to receive advance
notification of security issues. The list is just a tool. People
reporting
On 2014-06-06, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear misc readers,
I try to understand why MAKEDEV is failing inside my chroot, while i
can manually create some dev with mknod .
Like:
SCRIPT ${DESTDIR}/dev/MAKEDEV dev/MAKEDEV
SPECIAL cd dev; sh MAKEDEV ramdisk
On 07 Jun 2014, at 08:38, Maxime Villard m...@m00nbsd.net wrote:
Contributing code upstream would have been a way more productive
approach;
It's already been stated that working with upstream is out of
the question for at least the following reasons:
* Bugs linger unattended for years.
* The
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2014-06-06, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear misc readers,
I try to understand why MAKEDEV is failing inside my chroot, while i
can manually create some dev with mknod .
Like:
SCRIPT
Em 07-06-2014 03:38, Maxime Villard escreveu:
But the devs preferred to fork and now blame people. So, no, I don't
think LibreSSL will prevail, simply because it has - and will have -
nothing new and because it has no credibility.
You should really take a look at the source code. If you're
On 06/06/2014 10:04 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
OpenBSD having declined to use the tool shouldn't be interpreted e.g. by
OpenSSL as a reason not to notify LibreSSL directly.
It seems worth noting that OpenBSD 5.5, the current release that many
people are running, incorporates OpenSSL, not
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 08:20:00AM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2014-06-06, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear misc readers,
I try to understand why MAKEDEV is failing inside my chroot, while i
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 08:20:00AM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2014-06-06, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear misc readers,
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 12:14:55PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 08:20:00AM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:14 PM, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 08:20:00AM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 12:28:28PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:14 PM, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 08:20:00AM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Jun
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 12:28:28PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:14 PM, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sat,
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 01:30:01PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 12:28:28PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:14 PM, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jun
previously on this list Giancarlo Razzolini contributed:
What gives LibreSSL more credibility? There's almost nothing new or
innovative in it; it's just a cleaned up copy of OpenSSL.
You should do your homework.
Too right, also those previous two lines showed he has no clue about
real
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 01:30:01PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 12:28:28PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at
I'm having troubles installing OpenBSD 5.5 (amd64) on a mSATA SSD card (
http://pcengines.ch/msata16a.htm) PC Engines APU.1C device (
http://pcengines.ch/apu.htm) with the most recent BIOS version.
I've made several attempts, using install55.fs copied to an SD card, with
both 5.5-release and
Is this some kind of security protection ?
of course... see mknod(2).
i read it and still does not understand.
Check the description of EINVAL.
On 2014-06-07 12:51, JB M wrote:
I'm having troubles installing OpenBSD 5.5 (amd64) on a mSATA SSD card
(
http://pcengines.ch/msata16a.htm) PC Engines APU.1C device (
http://pcengines.ch/apu.htm) with the most recent BIOS version.
I've made several attempts, using install55.fs copied to an SD
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
Is this some kind of security protection ?
of course... see mknod(2).
i read it and still does not understand.
Check the description of EINVAL.
i was reading the (8) man pages :-(
So DESTDIR is nor working and make
# dmesg
console is /virtual-devices@100/console@1
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 1995-2014 OpenBSD. All rights reserved.
http://www.OpenBSD.org
OpenBSD 5.5 (GENERIC.MP) #173: Tue Mar 4 14:47:47
On 2014-06-07, Maxime Villard m...@m00nbsd.net wrote:
What gives LibreSSL more credibility? There's almost nothing new or
innovative in it; it's just a cleaned up copy of OpenSSL. There might
be some changes in the future, but you can be sure that LibreSSL will
lag behind OpenSSL - and most of
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 8:51 PM, JB M jbm.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having troubles installing OpenBSD 5.5 (amd64) on a mSATA SSD card (
http://pcengines.ch/msata16a.htm) PC Engines APU.1C device (
http://pcengines.ch/apu.htm) with the most recent BIOS version.
I've made several attempts,
The description of EINVAL in mknod(2) is wrong:
[EINVAL] The process is running within an alternate root
directory, as created by chroot(2).
Even if a process chroot()s back to /, it can't create a device node.
The program below exits with EINVAL:
27 matches
Mail list logo
