In OpenBSD 5.6, the prototype and man-page for hosts.equiv(5) have
disappeared. However, this file is still referenced in sshd_config(5)
and (if I'm searching the sources correctly) in /usr/src/usr.bin/ssh
auth-rhosts.c which is included in the sshd/Makefile.
Is the removal accidental or an ind
On 2014-11-07, "System Administrator" wrote:
> In the description of the -b option:
> ...
> three elliptic curve sizes: 256, 384 or 521 bits.
>
> Is 521 correct
Yes. Those are ecdsa-sha2-nistp521 keys.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
In the description of the -b option:
...
three elliptic curve sizes: 256, 384 or 521 bits.
Is 521 correct or is it supposed to be 512?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Carlin Bingham wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, at 04:25 AM, sven falempin wrote:
>> Dear misc,
>>
>> In openbsd 5.5 ~~ was not experimental.
>>
>> Insight ?
>>
>> --
>> ---
On 11/7/2014 1:37 PM, Jungle Boogie wrote:
> Dear Ingo, Misc
>
> From: Ingo Schwarze
> Sent: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:18:08 +0100
> To: Jungle Boogie Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Updating ports from CVS question
> >
>> Jungle Boogie wrote on Fri, Nov
>On 2014-11-07, li...@ggp2.com wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:12:20PM -0200, "Dante F. B. Col??" wrote:
>>> I'm trying to setup some static routes on a openbsd 4.9 box for some
>>> public addresses
>>
>> This usually gets mentioned, so I'll go ahead and bring this to your
>> attention.
>
>Y
Dear Ingo, Misc
From: Ingo Schwarze
Sent: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:18:08 +0100
To: Jungle Boogie Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Updating ports from CVS question
>
Jungle Boogie wrote on Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:20:36AM -0800:
Great idea! How do you upd
On 2014-11-07, Jungle Boogie wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> # uname -a
> OpenBSD jackknife.my.domain 5.6 GENERIC.MP#0 i386
>
> This system should be -current as of last night.
>
> I'm trying to build ports:
> # cd /usr
> # cvs -qd anon...@anoncvs.usa.openbsd.org:/cvs get -rOPENBSD_`uname -r | sed
> 's/\
On 2014-11-06, Jakub Skrzypnik wrote:
> Peter, you can always found logs, even from ddb in
> /var/log/messages{.[0-9].gz} (valid regexp?)
This might get saved at boot, but it depends on the machine, some clear the
dmesg buffer during startup. Since Peter says "unfortunately my computer
didn't sav
On 2014-11-07, li...@ggp2.com wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:12:20PM -0200, "Dante F. B. Col??" wrote:
>> I'm trying to setup some static routes on a openbsd 4.9 box for some
>> public addresses
>
> This usually gets mentioned, so I'll go ahead and bring this to your
> attention.
Yes, it us
Jungle Boogie wrote on Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:20:36AM -0800:
> Great idea! How do you update your ports, then?
> Just download a new ports.tar.gz file
If you are running -stable, that doesn't help.
The file ports.tar.gz doesn't get updated for -stable after release.
> or:
> # cd /usr/ports
> #
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 17:43, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am reading through the FAQ again and just saw that in 8.14 lynx is
> mentioned as still being in base:
Yep. Updated to recommend ftp(1) now. :)
>> On 2014-11-07, David Higgs wrote:
>> > I defined the 'svn' port in /etc/services but as of 5.6 this file
>> > now appears to be unconditionally overwritten during upgrades
>> > (previously it was handled via sysmerge).
>> >
>> > Is there a better mechanism to keep these, or should I just update
Hi,
I am reading through the FAQ again and just saw that in 8.14 lynx is
mentioned as still being in base:
Lynx, a text-based browser, is in the base system, and has SSL support.
Other browsers available include (in no particular order):
How could that happen? :-) We lost users over this!!
Dear Steve,
From: Steve Williams
Sent: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:11:51 -0700
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Updating ports from CVS question
>
Hi,
It is 1000 times faster (or some value... but wayyy faster) to just ftp the
"ports.tar.gz" file over whe
Hi,
It is 1000 times faster (or some value... but wayyy faster) to just ftp
the "ports.tar.gz" file over when compared to using CVS.
Just saying...
Cheers,
Steve Williams
On 11/7/2014 8:47 AM, Jungle Boogie wrote:
Hello All,
# uname -a
OpenBSD jackknife.my.domain 5.6 GENERIC.MP#0 i386
Th
Hi,
I downloaded -current as of November 6 @ 11:26 and installed it. I'm
doing a "test run" upgrading my system & started to install required
packages.
At first, I thought the snapshot wasn't complete as I couldn't find the
mysql server. After a bit of head scratching, I went onto the cvswe
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 08:46:52 + (UTC), Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2014-11-07, David Higgs wrote:
> > I defined the 'svn' port in /etc/services but as of 5.6 this file
> > now appears to be unconditionally overwritten during upgrades
> > (previously it was handled via sysmerge).
> >
> > Is th
Hello All,
# uname -a
OpenBSD jackknife.my.domain 5.6 GENERIC.MP#0 i386
This system should be -current as of last night.
I'm trying to build ports:
# cd /usr
# cvs -qd anon...@anoncvs.usa.openbsd.org:/cvs get -rOPENBSD_`uname -r | sed
's/\./_/'` -P ports
Problem is that I got impatient and t
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, at 04:25 AM, sven falempin wrote:
> Dear misc,
>
> In openbsd 5.5 ~~ was not experimental.
>
> Insight ?
>
> --
> -
> () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e
Dear misc,
In openbsd 5.5 ~~ was not experimental.
Insight ?
--
-
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\
That is not supported. You MUST NOT have IPs in the same range on
different interfaces.
You can assign some /32s (or /128 if you are using IPv6) to a lo1 on the
system, but that may not be what you want.
On 2014 Nov 06 (Thu) at 19:12:20 -0200 (-0200), "Dante F. B. Col??" wrote:
:Hello everyone
On 2014-11-06 Thu 17:35 PM |, Alexei Malinin wrote:
>
> Where is your question, Craig?
>
These probably aren't the right words Alexei;-
When wscons(4) is used with various termcap types, bold & blink work.
Could pccon do this too?
src/sys/dev/wscons/wsemul_vt100_subr.c has:
bold WSATTR_HILIT
Am 11/07/14 um 15:15 schrieb Alexander Hall:
> On November 7, 2014 2:55:50 PM CET, Stefan Wollny
> wrote:
>> Am 11/06/14 um 13:38 schrieb Nick Holland:
>>> On 11/06/14 02:36, Stefan Wollny wrote:
Hi there!
This morning I fetched the latest snapshots (#537) from
ftp.hostserver.
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:12:20PM -0200, "Dante F. B. Col??" wrote:
> I'm trying to setup some static routes on a openbsd 4.9 box for some
> public addresses
This usually gets mentioned, so I'll go ahead and bring this to your
attention.
OpenBSD 4.9 is long unsupported. There have been many re
Hi,
A couple of typos in http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html
Section 4.5.2 - The Install Questions.
"syspending" => "suspending"
Section 4.5.4 - Choosing installation media and file sets.
"...using "+" and "-" chars..." - I think "characters" would be more
clear for a non-programmer.
Sect
On November 7, 2014 2:55:50 PM CET, Stefan Wollny wrote:
>Am 11/06/14 um 13:38 schrieb Nick Holland:
>> On 11/06/14 02:36, Stefan Wollny wrote:
>>> Hi there!
>>>
>>> This morning I fetched the latest snapshots (#537) from
>>> ftp.hostserver.de. As usual after rebooting I updated the sources
>from
Am 11/06/14 um 13:38 schrieb Nick Holland:
> On 11/06/14 02:36, Stefan Wollny wrote:
>> Hi there!
>>
>> This morning I fetched the latest snapshots (#537) from
>> ftp.hostserver.de. As usual after rebooting I updated the sources from
>> the same server being set in '.profile' as CVSROOT.
>>
>> This
As git is already there, it just makes sense.
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:46:52AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014-11-07, David Higgs wrote:
> > I defined the 'svn' port in /etc/services but as of 5.6 this file now
> > appears to be unconditionally overwritten during upgrades (previously
>
Hi all,
When I add an ip address to an interface in OpenBSD 5.6 it will create
two routes:
172.16/16 link#15UC 00 - 4
vether99
172.16.25.1fe:e1:ba:d1:50:44 UHLl 00 - 1
lo0
before it would only create:
172.16/16
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Rusty wrote:
> On 11/05/14 20:04, Joel Sing wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >> I see errors trying to download some https URLs using python, but the
> >> base ftp client isn't affected. 5.6 release and current. One example is
> >> https://www.duosecurity.com/
Hi misc@,
after upgrading our pair of dhcpd servers to 5.6(-stable), i am seeing
strange DHCPACKs in our logs (in both of them):
Nov 7 09:28:34 dhcpd2 dhcpd[9269]: DHCPINFORM from 192.168.20.251
Nov 7 09:28:34 dhcpd2 dhcpd[9269]: DHCPACK on to
5c:51:4f:56:81:c3 via em0
Nov 7 09:28:35 dhcpd2 d
hello,
I use OpenBSD 5.5 as a firewall gateway.
I also use nfsen/nfdump as the netflow collector/analyzer.
pf.conf enables netflow for every pf rule (set state-defaults pflow).
When I analyse traffic using nfdump, some packets are missing. But on the
firewall, tcpdump shows there is traffic for
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014-11-07, David Higgs wrote:
>> I defined the 'svn' port in /etc/services but as of 5.6 this file now
>> appears to be unconditionally overwritten during upgrades (previously
>> it was handled via sysmerge).
>>
>> Is there a better me
On 2014-11-07, David Higgs wrote:
> I defined the 'svn' port in /etc/services but as of 5.6 this file now
> appears to be unconditionally overwritten during upgrades (previously
> it was handled via sysmerge).
>
> Is there a better mechanism to keep these, or should I just update
> pf.conf to use
Am Donnerstag, den 06.11.2014, 21:24 +0100 schrieb Maurice Janssen:
> I suppose the comment in rc.conf should be: for normal use: ""
> Just like most other services. Is that correct?
A look into rc.subr:
| eval _rcflags=\${${_name}_flags}
[..]
| [ -n "${_rcflags}" ] && daemon_flags=${_rcflags}
36 matches
Mail list logo
