On 11/28/2014 06:21 PM, trondd wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Edgar Pettijohn pettijo...@hotmail.com
wrote:
This is something I've been interested in trying, but I would want it as a
wireless access point as well and not sure what cards are supported and
work well. Does anyone
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:13:46AM +0200, Liviu Daia wrote:
On 28 November 2014, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:00:19PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
[...]
No, it is not proper behavior. As a store and forward system with
potentially 4-5 days between
i have written for myself a small python3 script that
removes accented characters and all utf8 symbols
from filenames, a kind of utf-8 to ascii sanitizer.
while working on it, i created some strange test cases
(e.g. »´ÁÉǑÄ«) for filenames and i was pleasently
surprised that the files were
Hello,
On 29 November 2014 at 14:02, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
i have written for myself a small python3 script that
removes accented characters and all utf8 symbols
from filenames, a kind of utf-8 to ascii sanitizer.
Are you aware of 'detox' package?
--
Regards,
Ville
frantisek holop, 29 Nov 2014 13:02:
while working on it, i created some strange test cases
(e.g. »´ÁÉǑÄ«) for filenames and i was pleasently
surprised that the files were created/read/renamed/deleted
without problems.
i think i should clarify this a bit:
they show perfect in midnight
Ville Valkonen, 29 Nov 2014 14:08:
Are you aware of 'detox' package?
$ touch »´ÁÉǑÄ«
$ detox *
$ ls
A_A_A_A_C_A_A_
$ touch »´ÁÉǑÄ«
$ my_silly_script
$ ls
aeoa
perhaps with some massaging detox can be made
to work like my script, i dont know. but that is
actually besides the point.
i wrote my
Shouldn't in 2014 the aim having all working in utf-8?
On 29 November 2014, Liviu Daia liviu.d...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Not sure about Postfix being right, but it does solve the
initial problem: you fix the relay, you run postfix -r ALL, and the
messages go on their way.
[...]
s/postfix -r ALL/postsuper -r ALL/
Regards,
Liviu
On 29 November 2014, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:13:46AM +0200, Liviu Daia wrote:
On 28 November 2014, Gilles Chehade gil...@poolp.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:00:19PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
[...]
No, it is not proper behavior. As a
Paolo Aglialoro, 29 Nov 2014 13:56:
Shouldn't in 2014 the aim having all working in utf-8?
sure.
but i like my filenames ascii and whitespaceless.
shows my age.
-f
--
what a nice night for an evening. -- steven wright
frantisek holop said:
is it true to say then, that ffs is entirely utf8 safe,
and/or that ffs is actually an utf-8 encoded filesystem
as IIRC Mac OS is? or is it some kind of happy accident
that it works? :)
As I get it, ffs is entirely utf8 safe because it is not encoding
aware. With
Hi,
On 29.11.2014 13:20, frantisek holop wrote:
i think i should clarify this a bit:
they show perfect in midnight commander, not in shell.
$ touch »´ÁÉǑÄ«
$ ls
??
-f
I had a similar problem some time ago and have been told that the ls
tool is not aware of UTF-8. See here for
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 13:02, frantisek holop wrote:
is it true to say then, that ffs is entirely utf8 safe,
and/or that ffs is actually an utf-8 encoded filesystem
as IIRC Mac OS is? or is it some kind of happy accident
that it works? :)
FFS stores filenames as bytes.
You were dead right. Dont know why they were different though, but problem
solved.
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 22:04:48 -0500
From: n...@holland-consulting.net
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Error while building current
On 11/28/14 20:52, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
Not terribly concerned just
On 2014-11-29, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
is it true to say then, that ffs is entirely utf8 safe,
and/or that ffs is actually an utf-8 encoded filesystem
as IIRC Mac OS is?
The former. Unix filesystems accept all bytes for filenames with
the exception of 0x2f, which serves as
On 2014-11-29, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
$ touch »´ÁÉǑÄ«
$ ls
??
If you need a locale-aware ls(1), use the one from the colorls package.
(Don't worry, colored output is entirely optional.)
--
Christian naddy Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
Hi,
Paolo Aglialoro wrote on Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 01:56:23PM +0100:
Shouldn't in 2014 the aim having all working in utf-8?
Most definitely not, that would directly run contrary to some of
OpenBSD's most important project goals: Correctness, simplicity,
security.
While the article is old, the
n...@holland-consulting.net (Nick Holland), 2014.10.25 (Sat) 06:08 (CEST):
[big snip of the original discussion on screen blanking and it's
handling by mplayer]
Personally, I'm slowly losing interest in screen blanking. LCD screens
draw little power when on, [...]
[snipping again]
A laptop
On Nov 29 13:02:34, min...@obiit.org wrote:
is it true to say then, that ffs is entirely utf8 safe,
and/or that ffs is actually an utf-8 encoded filesystem
The file names are just strings of bytes.
There is nothing UTF8 about them.
On Nov 29 14:23:35, czark...@gmail.com wrote:
(Interestingly,
This commit is the only one in the tree attributed to pierre@:
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/daily.diff?r1=1.19r2=1.20
But according to the ChangeLogs that commit was made by deraadt@ (scroll all
the way to the bottom, it's the very last entry):
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:08:32PM +0200, Ville Valkonen wrote:
Hello,
On 29 November 2014 at 14:02, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
i have written for myself a small python3 script that
removes accented characters and all utf8 symbols
from filenames, a kind of utf-8 to ascii
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Marcus MERIGHI mcmer-open...@tor.at wrote:
n...@holland-consulting.net (Nick Holland), 2014.10.25 (Sat) 06:08 (CEST):
[big snip of the original discussion on screen blanking and it's
handling by mplayer]
Personally, I'm slowly losing interest in screen
On 28.11.2014 22:51, Ezequiel Garzon wrote:
Thanks for all the replies. Ville, I'm using -release, on the i386
architecture... inside a VPS. I can gather from the replies that
indeed
httpd is changing quite fast right now, so it doesn't seem very
useful
to report on -release. (In fact,
Ingo Schwarze said:
While the article is old, the essence of what Schneier said here
still stands, and it is not likely to fall in the future:
https://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0007.html#9
Sorry, but this article is mostly based on lack of understanding of
Unicode.
that would directly
On 11/27/2014 07:38 AM, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
I have also learned to use the -C flag to patch...
Have we ever considered changing the suggested shell commands in the
patches to ensure that the patch will apply cleanly before trying? We
could wrap the actual patch command an if-block with a
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 00:57:18 +0100
Antoine Jacoutot ajacou...@bsdfrog.org wrote:
Not that I can find, but what you're saying here is what I'm seeing:
bash _was_ on the system for a short time a while back when it was needed
to get grolog to run on OBSD64. Afterward it was removed.
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 16:08, Libertas wrote:
On 11/27/2014 07:38 AM, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
I have also learned to use the -C flag to patch...
Have we ever considered changing the suggested shell commands in the
patches to ensure that the patch will apply cleanly before trying? We
could
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff czark...@gmail.com wrote:
Ingo Schwarze said:
While the article is old, the essence of what Schneier said here
still stands, and it is not likely to fall in the future:
https://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0007.html#9
Sorry, but this
OFF TOPIC. This has nothing to do with OpenBSD,
but a lot of guys here know about this stuff.
I've done some reading, but still not sure.
OK, at the risk of looking stupid,which of these passwords is better;
kMH65?3
or
mylittlelambjumpedovertenredbarns
The latter, I would bet.
On 11/29/2014 10:07 PM, Eric Furman wrote:
OFF TOPIC. This has nothing to do with OpenBSD,
but a lot of guys here know about this stuff.
I've done some reading, but still not sure.
OK, at the risk of looking stupid,which of these passwords is better;
kMH65?3
or
Am 29.11.2014 um 13:20 schrieb frantisek holop:
i think i should clarify this a bit:
they show perfect in midnight commander, not in shell.
$ touch »´ÁÉǑÄ«
$ ls
??
# ls | cat
Will display the characters right.
Not entirely sure why though.
On 30.11.2014 04:07, Eric Furman wrote:
OFF TOPIC. This has nothing to do with OpenBSD,
but a lot of guys here know about this stuff.
I've done some reading, but still not sure.
OK, at the risk of looking stupid,which of these passwords is better;
kMH65?3
or
mylittlelambjumpedovertenredbarns
On 11/29/14 22:06, Eric Furman wrote:
OFF TOPIC. This has nothing to do with OpenBSD,
but a lot of guys here know about this stuff.
I've done some reading, but still not sure.
OK, at the risk of looking stupid,which of these passwords is better;
kMH65?3
or
mylittlelambjumpedovertenredbarns
On 30.11.2014 06:48, Nick Holland wrote:
On 11/29/14 22:06, Eric Furman wrote:
OFF TOPIC. This has nothing to do with OpenBSD,
but a lot of guys here know about this stuff.
I've done some reading, but still not sure.
OK, at the risk of looking stupid,which of these passwords is
better;
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 06:34:33PM -0500, Geoff Steckel wrote:
When an interface is given an IP6 address in anew rdomain,
lo0 is named in various routes when that table is queried
via netstat -r -f inet
Does the pseudo-interface lo0 actually exist in multiple
routing tables simultaneously,
35 matches
Mail list logo
