On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
>> Ok, so if somebody interested in - h2ph is expecting files on its command
>> line, not something else. (that was an issue with a unix socket, sneaked in
>> to the /usr/include as
On Apr 7, 2015 8:42 AM, "patrick keshishian" @
gmail.com > wrote:
>
> On 4/6/15, L.R. D.S. @
mail.com > wrote:
> >>At 6 Apr 2015 23:12:43 + (UTC) from Brian Callahan @ devio.us >:
> >>
> >>Or, and this is just a hypothesis, you don't have all those other things
> >>and FVWM lists those for conv
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Mario St-Gelais wrote:
> I have been playing around trying to come up with something that kind of have
> the verbosity of lsusb but use OpenBSD's #include and avoid
> all of libusb stuff.
>
> I hit a wall when I try to use USB_DEVICE_GET_FDESC :
...
> So basically
Hi list.
I am wondering if someone could shed some light on what I am trying to do.
I have been playing around trying to come up with something that kind of have
the verbosity of lsusb but use OpenBSD's #include and avoid all
of libusb stuff.
I hit a wall when I try to use USB_DEVICE_GET_FDESC
A heads up on this commit: if you're following -current and using any
perl modules that pull in threaded libraries from packages, such as
mysql/mariadb integration via DBD::mysql, then you may want to wait
the day or so until the ports package builds have caught up with the
change. The perl in bas
sorry for low level response ,
about openbox , all know that
$ cp -R /etc/xdg/openbox/* ~/.config/openbox
$ cat
.xinitrc
exec openbox-session
by the way
in linux , i love lxde (speed=xfce4 , but more modern).
and
i have recieved email.
that recommend i3 ( http://i3wm.org/ ) which says
On 4/6/15, L.R. D.S. wrote:
>>At 6 Apr 2015 23:12:43 + (UTC) from Brian Callahan :
>>
>>Or, and this is just a hypothesis, you don't have all those other things
>>and FVWM lists those for convenience.
>
> No, I can load everything normally...
> ok, I'm a bit worried now. I always check the sig
>At 6 Apr 2015 23:12:43 + (UTC) from Brian Callahan :
>
>Or, and this is just a hypothesis, you don't have all those other things
>and FVWM lists those for convenience.
No, I can load everything normally...
ok, I'm a bit worried now. I always check the signatures before/after install.
You fol
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 07:12:43PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
> Or, and this is just a hypothesis, you don't have all those other things
> and FVWM lists those for convenience.
I include CWM and FVWM, I don't know why include two WM.
--
Regards
Henrique Lengler
On 04/06/15 19:08, L.R. D.S. wrote:
>> At 6 Apr 2015 22:55:07 + (UTC) from Ted Unangst :
>>
>> Huh?
> Well, I was MitM'd ? The current snapshot (install57.iso) have all that
> packages here...
> When 'startx' they enter on Fvwm by default and when click on screen have:
> (Re)Start > WM's
>
O
>At 6 Apr 2015 22:55:07 + (UTC) from Ted Unangst :
>
>Huh?
Well, I was MitM'd ? The current snapshot (install57.iso) have all that
packages here...
When 'startx' they enter on Fvwm by default and when click on screen have:
(Re)Start > WM's
L.R. D.S. wrote:
> I think developers could do with WM the same done with lynx, remove and put
> on ports.
> I don't think someone need all the 9 WM on base system (fvwm, cwm, wm2, twm,
> ctwm, flwm, mwm, openbox and tvtwm).
Huh?
carbolite:~> wm2
ksh: wm2: not found
carbolite:~> ctwm
ksh: ctwm:
I just spend two hours trouble shutting VPN connection with one of
external customer servers (Cisco 3000). It boils down to the fact that
VPNC client in our ports tree is compiled without OpenSSL support. I
noticed that customer's server was planting self-signed SSL certificate
while playing on Win
I think developers could do with WM the same done with lynx, remove and put on
ports.
I don't think someone need all the 9 WM on base system (fvwm, cwm, wm2, twm,
ctwm, flwm, mwm, openbox and tvtwm).
That's bloat. And flwm need fltk 1.3.X. JWM is really user friendly, minimal,
don't have depende
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 09:43:55AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >Why don't you craft the attack yourself and report to OpenBSD
> >your results?
>
> Quite obvious why the question was asked, rather than studied.
Yes, it is obvious. Because I'm incompetent, otherwise I would not ask.
(But this tr
On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:11:21 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> On my twelve or thirteen year old single-processor 32-bit box running
> a Japanese IME and stuff that works with Japanese, fvwm doesn't really
> feel any lighter. Typing really lags sometimes when the processor gets
> busy.
>
> Which is what I
On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 22:11:21 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Kevin Chadwick
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:19:57 +0900
> > Joel Rees wrote:
> >
> >> I'm using XFCE4 okay. It's a bit heavy, but I can use it, with
> >> patience.
> >>
> >> (I need to check my X11 configu
Eivind Eide writes:
>> i recommend jwm as window manager .
>
> Second that. It's a good WM for slow systems. But obsd port sticks at 2.1.0
> http://openports.se/x11/jwm
> while upstreams have 2.2.2
> http://www.joewing.net/projects/jwm/release-2.2.shtml#v2.2.2
> ...probably have to read myself u
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> I'm sorry, but you've generated so many threads over the same build error
> that i dont understand anymore what you're trying to achieve, what situation
> you're coming from, and what you're doing to get this error.
And it doesn't help that I
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:19:57 +0900
> Joel Rees wrote:
>
>> I'm using XFCE4 okay. It's a bit heavy, but I can use it, with patience.
>>
>> (I need to check my X11 configuration.)
>>
>> But fvwm, the "default" window manager, is no lighter than
I have an old softraid crypto image (huge file). While accessing
its files (vnd->softraid crypto->ffs) the OS locks = I can't
get output of any command and I can't kill a process touching
the softraid crypto filesystem. Hard power reset is only way.
The kernel doesn't panic, I can access ddb but n
On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 15:19:57 +0900
Joel Rees wrote:
> I'm using XFCE4 okay. It's a bit heavy, but I can use it, with patience.
>
> (I need to check my X11 configuration.)
>
> But fvwm, the "default" window manager, is no lighter than XFCE4.
Do you mean xfwm which is based on fvwm, if so the lig
Hi, does the tips here help?
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#ksh
2015-04-06 7:22 GMT+03:00 Philip Guenther :
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Andrew Fresh wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 10:50:47PM -0300, Henrique Lengler wrote:
> >> And it is called in ~.profile with this:
> >> . /home
I'm sorry, but you've generated so many threads over the same build error
that i dont understand anymore what you're trying to achieve, what
situation you're coming from, and what you're doing to get this error.
Is this on 5.6/i386 ? with -stable patches applied ? Trying to build a port
from the s
24 matches
Mail list logo
