Re: An AR9280 as an Access Point

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 05:01:52PM -0400, mabi wrote: > I am using an Atheros AR9281 in a Soekris box with OpenBSD 5.9 as access > point and I am quite disappointed with it. Often I get disconnected from the > access point and all I can see on the OpenBSD side is tons of timeout > messages in

Re: what all touches the carp demote counter?

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 08:37:59AM +0200, mxb wrote: > But as R0me0 stated, you should probably re-check your configuration. The configuration checked out. I rebooted a few more times, and I couldn't reproduce the problem. I still have no idea why the carp demotion counter was set to 2 the first

Re: quirks "unsigned package," "Can't find CONTENTS"

On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 08:47:31AM -0400, yary wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Foo74 wrote: > > > > Thanks for posting the response. Do you know what from the error message > > shows that it was a -current build? I think I would have spent days > > figuring that

Re: An AR9280 as an Access Point

I am using an Atheros AR9281 in a Soekris box with OpenBSD 5.9 as access point and I am quite disappointed with it. Often I get disconnected from the access point and all I can see on the OpenBSD side is tons of timeout messages in the kernel log such as: athn0: device timeout I hope for

Re: VMM test

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 05:17:19PM +0200, Lampshade wrote: > >> Hi Everybody, > >> > >> I would like to give a try to vmm. If I do so, which os can I expect > >> to make it work? openbsd ok I guess. Linux? Windows? > > >OpenBSD only, as of now. > > Does it support both i386 and amd64 OpenBSDs

Re: lyrics.html nit.

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 01:14:56PM +, Michal Bozon wrote: > > -With twitchy fingers on flashing keys > > +Twitchy fingers, flashing keys > > > > -always claiming "it was just a prank!" > > +Claiming "it was just a prank!" > > hi, this time (60c), i hear this: > > Money, donate your pay. >

Re: opensmtpd-extras-[clamav|spamassassin] packages in 6.0

Thanks Joerg. I wasn't aware that amavis would play nicely with OpenSMTPD, as such problem solved. I will simply use amavisd-new. Original Message Subject: Re: opensmtpd-extras-[clamav|spamassassin] packages in 6.0 Local Time: October 11, 2016 11:27 PM UTC Time: October 11,

Donating 10 Beagle Bone Black Rev. C boards

Hello, The engineering firm I work for agreed to donate 10 Beagle Bone Black Rev. C boards to any OpenBSD developer that needs them. Hopefully this will help further the armv7 port of OpenBSD. Please contact me off list for details. Thank you, Sam

Re: An AR9280 as an Access Point

On 12 October 2016, Liviu Daia wrote: > On 11 October 2016, physkets wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I'd asked a related question on the OpenBSD subreddit, and someone > > pointed me here. Hope this is appropriate. > >

Re: An AR9280 as an Access Point

On 11 October 2016, physkets wrote: > Hello! > > I'd asked a related question on the OpenBSD subreddit, and someone > pointed me here. Hope this is appropriate. > https://www.reddit.com/r/openbsd/comments/56lzhu/which_wifi_card_to_make_an_access_point > > Does anyone know

Re: A (possibly dumb) question about unbound

Cool thanks all! On Wednesday, October 12, 2016, Mark Carroll wrote: > On 12 Oct 2016, Bryan C. Everly wrote: > > > Could someone educate me on why unbound's configuration file is in > > /var/unbound/etc instead of just straight up /etc like most other > > things? > > Like nsd,

Re: VMM test

>> Hi Everybody, >> >> I would like to give a try to vmm. If I do so, which os can I expect >> to make it work? openbsd ok I guess. Linux? Windows? >OpenBSD only, as of now. Does it support both i386 and amd64 OpenBSDs guests?

Re: A (possibly dumb) question about unbound

On 12 Oct 2016, Bryan C. Everly wrote: > Could someone educate me on why unbound's configuration file is in > /var/unbound/etc instead of just straight up /etc like most other > things? Like nsd, for security unbound can run within a chroot so it then does not have access to anything outside

Re: A (possibly dumb) question about unbound

Because it runs chrooted to /var/unbound On 10/12, Bryan C. Everly wrote: > Hi @misc, > > I recently installed my first FreeBSD server and was really surprised > at their on disk directory layout. I guess I've been spoiled by > OpenBSD being so consistent in terms of where things go. > > Which

Re: An AR9280 as an Access Point

The card from pcengines is well supported by OpenBSD. Use the athn(4) driver. Works nice in my APU2 :) ‎http://man.openbsd.org/OpenBSD-6.0/man4/athn.4 For your use case look at the end of the man page @bugs and @caveeats Freundliche Grüße / Regards -stefan kapfhammer Originalnachricht Von:

Re: An AR9280 as an Access Point

On Tue, October 11, 2016 12:04 pm, physkets wrote: > Hello! > > I'd asked a related question on the OpenBSD subreddit, and someone > pointed me here. Hope this is appropriate. > https://www.reddit.com/r/openbsd/comments/56lzhu/which_wifi_card_to_make_an_access_point > > Does anyone know how good a

A (possibly dumb) question about unbound

Hi @misc, I recently installed my first FreeBSD server and was really surprised at their on disk directory layout. I guess I've been spoiled by OpenBSD being so consistent in terms of where things go. Which brings me to my question... Could someone educate me on why unbound's configuration

Re: An AR9280 as an Access Point

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 06:04:55PM +0200, physkets wrote: > Hello! > > I'd asked a related question on the OpenBSD subreddit, and someone > pointed me here. Hope this is appropriate. > https://www.reddit.com/r/openbsd/comments/56lzhu/which_wifi_card_to_make_an_access_point > > Does anyone know

Re: Failure to get unbound to talk to nsd on the same server

Hi, Haven't followed the whole thread and by just looking at the topic, I have a similar setup (carped as well) for caching DNS. 2 servers, 2 carped IPs. This is how it works: unbound.conf: interface: 127.0.0.1 port: 53 outgoing-interface: ext_ip access-control: local_networks

Re: More syntax/parsing issues in the lists/macros of pf

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:50:41AM -0400, Russell Sutherland wrote: > Is it possible to use a macro variable with a network CIDR value and then > reference it later in a list? > > E.g. This first example is fine: > > > a = “1.2.3.4” > b = “2.3.4.5” > > c = “{“ $a $b “}” > > works as

An AR9280 as an Access Point

Hello! I'd asked a related question on the OpenBSD subreddit, and someone pointed me here. Hope this is appropriate. https://www.reddit.com/r/openbsd/comments/56lzhu/which_wifi_card_to_make_an_access_point Does anyone know how good a WiFi Access Point I could make of the Atheros AR9280 card

Re: Multiple web servers behind NAT

On Wed, October 12, 2016 1:38 am, Florian Ermisch wrote: > > So relayd doesn't support SNI yet? > Not that SNI and having a cert for each > site on the relay covers the usecase but > httpd does support SNI, right? > > Regards, Florian > I think you are correct. I think SNI was added to libtls

More syntax/parsing issues in the lists/macros of pf

Is it possible to use a macro variable with a network CIDR value and then reference it later in a list? E.g. This first example is fine: a = “1.2.3.4” b = “2.3.4.5” c = “{“ $a $b “}” works as expected, that is c ends up as a list with host values: c = "{ 1.2.3.4 2.3.4.5 }” But if one uses

Syntax / parsing problem IPv6 nat-to filter rule in PF

Hi all, In my packet-filter file (/etc/pf.conf) the following line does *not* work: match out on $rd6_if inet6 proto tcp to any port 119 nat-to { 2A01:1234:5678:9ABC::1/126 } round-robin If I however use the following syntax, it *does* work: match out on $rd6_if inet6 proto tcp to any port

Re: pf on carp backup resets connection after failover

This time it should be better. Again sorry.. Hi all, basically, if have exactly this problem already described here (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/yZn4EUjxwfY) . But because there is no answer since 2009, I'll give it a try. The setup of the 2 servers is also

Re: pf on carp backup resets connection after failover

Sorry for this bad web mailer formatting. I didn't want that.Am 12.10.2016 2:08 nachm. schrieb Robert Paschedag : > > Hi all, basically, if have exactly this problem already described > here(https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/yZn4EUjxwfY).But

pf on carp backup resets connection after failover

Hi all, basically, if have exactly this problem already described here(https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bit.listserv.openbsd-pf/yZn4EUjxwfY).But because there is no answer since 2009, I'll give it a try. The setup of the 2 servers is also the same as in the other threadonly exception is,

Re: VMM test

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Sébastien Morand wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > I would like to give a try to vmm. If I do so, which os can I expect > to make it work? openbsd ok I guess. Linux? Windows? OpenBSD only, as of now.

VMM test

Hi Everybody, I would like to give a try to vmm. If I do so, which os can I expect to make it work? openbsd ok I guess. Linux? Windows? Thanks by advance, Sebastien

Re: Failure to get unbound to talk to nsd on the same server

Hiya Johan, On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 23:50:20 +0200 Johan Mellberg wrote: > There is something weird here that I don't quite see/understand so I > very much appreciate the input so far. DNS is fun to run! The skilled OpenBSD devs have given us well set up separated daemons. Paul, I & others have

Re: what all touches the carp demote counter?

> On 11 okt. 2016, at 23:56, Paul B. Henson wrote: > > Does pfsync fiddle with the carp > demotion value even if it's not configured? No. But as R0me0 stated, you should probably re-check your configuration. carp.preempt=1 ( /etc/sysctl.conf ) on both nodes, if not node which