Hi,
I had to switch to ftp.openbsd.org to get the 008 patch for -stable
since my preferred mirror, ftp.eu.openbsd.org, doesn't seem to be
updating. The timestamp file says last update was run on 1495188001
(Fri May 19 12:00:01 CEST 2017).
There is no contact address in
https://ftp.eu.openbsd.org
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:28:30AM +0200, Andreas Kusalananda K?h?ri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had to switch to ftp.openbsd.org to get the 008 patch for -stable
> since my preferred mirror, ftp.eu.openbsd.org, doesn't seem to be
> updating. The timestamp file says last update was run on 1495188001
> (Fr
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:36:57AM +0200, Robert Peichaer wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:28:30AM +0200, Andreas Kusalananda K?h?ri wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had to switch to ftp.openbsd.org to get the 008 patch for -stable
> > since my preferred mirror, ftp.eu.openbsd.org, doesn't seem to be
>
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 09:40:58PM +0200, Roland Kammerer wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Today I upgraded to OpenBSD 6.1 and saw that none of the mirrors seem to
> contain packages for mips64el anymore. For example compare [1] and [2].
>
> Is that intentional? I wonder because mips64el is still in the "Ma
That mirror is updating way too slow.
> I had to switch to ftp.openbsd.org to get the 008 patch for -stable
> since my preferred mirror, ftp.eu.openbsd.org, doesn't seem to be
> updating. The timestamp file says last update was run on 1495188001
> (Fri May 19 12:00:01 CEST 2017).
>
> There is no
Am 05/21/17 um 10:28 schrieb Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri:
> Hi,
>
> I had to switch to ftp.openbsd.org to get the 008 patch for -stable
> since my preferred mirror, ftp.eu.openbsd.org, doesn't seem to be
> updating. The timestamp file says last update was run on 1495188001
> (Fri May 19 12:00:01 C
> Am 05/21/17 um 10:28 schrieb Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri:
>> I had to switch to ftp.openbsd.org to get the 008 patch for -stable
>> since my preferred mirror, ftp.eu.openbsd.org, doesn't seem to be
>> updating. The timestamp file says last update was run on 1495188001
>> (Fri May 19 12:00:01 CEST
On 2017-05-19, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> Hi, everybody
>
> I've run into a strange problem while trying to implement cisco's 'ip
> sla' replacement for a customer.
>
> at an openbsd router i have
>
> em0: 192.168.0.1/24 - local network
>
> em1: 111.111.111.2/30 - uplink 1
>
> em2: 222.222.222.2/3
Hello TheoB.,
Thank you for the detailed explanations.
I normally only read misc-messages in daily-digest,
so was unable to acknowledge your response when
I realized my error was already fixed online. oops.
Also, thank you for your care/dedication to OpenBSD.
Sincerely, harold felton.
On Sat,
Hi there,
I noticed patch #8 was already more than 2 days late from the mirror I
was using. To find out which servers are more or less up to date I
wrote a little script and here is the output.
This is of course a snapshot in time, on the other hand I hope this
list will benefit the community, ei
On 2017-05-21, Han Boetes wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I noticed patch #8 was already more than 2 days late from the mirror I
> was using. To find out which servers are more or less up to date I
> wrote a little script and here is the output.
>
> This is of course a snapshot in time, on the other hand I
On May 18 11:15:16, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> On May 17 15:33:04, j...@openbsd.org wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 May 2017 at 21:59:31 +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > > This is current current/i386 on a 2006 MacBook1,1 (model A1181).
> > > dmesg and sysctl hw below.
> > > The battery is not detected.
> > Can you a
12 matches
Mail list logo
