2017-09-29 3:31 GMT+02:00 Nick Holland :
>
> By that logic, we should have quit using cheap disks when they went over
> 32MB. Or 120MB. Or 504MB. Or 128GB. Or ...
> I have MBRs on 4TB SoftRaid volumes, works fine.
>
> fdisk, make the "entire" disk (welllthe first 2TB) OpenBSD.
> disklabel,
On 09/28/17 05:58, ti...@openmailbox.org wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 05:02:06PM -, ti...@openmailbox.org
>> wrote:
> ..
>>> What am I doing wrong, are there actually any installboot
>>> arguments that could help me make it work?
>>
>> It looks like you're using GPT on both the physical a
Le 28/09/2017 à 10:13, Stefan Sperling a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:55:41AM +0200, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
Le 27/09/2017 à 17:24, Stefan Sperling a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:11:45PM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Francois Pussault wrote:
maybe installing
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:57:10PM -0600, and...@quickstick.net wrote:
> Hello Folks !!
>
> Regarding GENERIC.MP #115
>
> I have a feeling you are about to roll into 6.2, however I just want to
> bring the following to your attention in case it matters.
>
> I just did a clean install of -current
On 28 September 2017 at 06:32, mabi wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer regarding SNI not being supported in relayd. I will go
> on and find another solution, probably HAproxy.
For a small number of domains it would probably be feasible to get a
single certificate with multiple SANs. Letsencrypt at
Hi Ingo,
thanks for the note, please find my notes below,
>> Example: In 6.1
>
> I assume that means you are using -stable.
>
>> there is package openvpn-2.4.1, how updates to the package are
>> handled? If there is critical issue with the package, then
>> "openvpn-2.4.1" is updated or it get
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:16:15 +, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Lets just wait until Ingo has time to look into it. He's still on
> holiday in Paris, so it might be a few days.
Hi,
I already reported this issue three months ago, along with other related
and unrelated bugs; see my second message in
Hi Zbyszek,
Zbyszek wrote on Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:43:35AM +0200:
> I am new to OpenBSD
Welcome.
> Example: In 6.1
I assume that means you are using -stable.
> there is package openvpn-2.4.1, how updates to the package are
> handled? If there is critical issue with the package, then
> "open
Thanks for the pointer regarding SNI not being supported in relayd. I will go
on and find another solution, probably HAproxy.
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: relayd TLS load balancer for multiple websites
> Local Time: September 28, 2017 3:02 PM
> UTC Time: September 28, 2017
m...@protonmail.ch (mabi), 2017.09.28 (Thu) 13:32 (CEST):
> I was wondering if it is possible to use relayd as load balancer with
> TLS termination for multiple different websites residing on different
> server.
With a public IP per website: yes. Else: no.
reyk@, 2014-07-24, "no SNI yet"
https:/
Thanks Bryan for your example.
I saw in your example you only use the example.com domain. I would be using
multiple domains such as example1.com, example2.com, exampleX.com, and so on.
Would it also work in that case? Again I suppose here that I need to have all
these different domains in one s
Op Wed, 27 Sep 2017 16:44:01 +0200 schreef Theo de Raadt
:
Firefox has W^X compliance and so runs with the secure defaults.
it uses page aliasing, which is a shitty way of being compliant
Do you mean dual-mapping a.k.a. double-mapping? I found some old patches
using a temporarily file and
Here is what I did, which I learned from the httpd & relayd book by Michael
W Lucas (I recommend). I cannot remember why I set the top header options,
I must have been trying to learn about them. The host ones are to figure
out the site and send the connection to the table above.
ext_addr="..."
Hi,
I was wondering if it is possible to use relayd as load balancer with TLS
termination for multiple different websites residing on different server.
From reading the man page I understand that for this purpose I will need to use
one "relay" entity per website which will then have its own "ht
On 2017-09-26, x9p wrote:
> Walking through ports i could not find alternatives to mount Linux LUKS
> encrypted storages and Truecrypt-compatible storages.
There aren't any in ports. It might be worth trying porting FUSE-based
implementations, though FUSE on OpenBSD is missing a few things so
por
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 05:02:06PM -, ti...@openmailbox.org wrote:
..
>> What am I doing wrong, are there actually any installboot arguments that
>> could help me make it work?
>
> It looks like you're using GPT on both the physical and the
> softraid disk, correct?
>
> In my setup, I have
Hi,
I am new to OpenBSD and after 15 years of work with linux i find OpenBSD as
very refreshing experience among bloated server software platforms, so guys
thanks for that.
My questions is about updating packages using pkg_add -u , i am kind of
confused about how it works.
Example: In 6.1 th
> On 27 Sep 2017, at 16:44, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> you really shouldn't be promising that to anyone. it might not happen,
> their design might not allow it.
>
> pledge in giant programs is very rare. chrome got LUCKY, and there is
> no evidence that firefox will also.
There was also anoth
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 08:48:31AM -, ti...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> In a world where such weird laptop manufacturers exist, OpenBSD
> having framebuffer rotation would fix the whole setup.
Yes, and as was already stated there are developers (not me) who plan to
do that work and might even gen
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:55:41AM +0200, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
..
>> And if I use a monitor in portrait orientation ?
>
> I have been using a monitor in portrait for many years and was never
> bothered by the console being the wrong way (X is rotated of course).
>
> In a rare situation where
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:55:41AM +0200, Stéphane Aulery wrote:
> Le 27/09/2017 à 17:24, Stefan Sperling a écrit :
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:11:45PM +0200, Kamil Cholewiński wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Francois Pussault wrote:
> > > > maybe installing a tool like xrandr ?
> > >
> > >
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 05:02:06PM -, ti...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:31:22AM -, ti...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> >> >> OpenBSD/amd64 BOOTX64 3.32
Are you running -current?
(We would already know that if you had included a dmesg -- tsk tsk).
In -current, boo
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 04:15:20AM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:11:49AM +1000, tomr wrote:
> > I remember seeing a post, I think on undeadly.org, which went through
> > having the bootloader on password-encrypted usb drive, that also
> > contains a keyfile for the mai
23 matches
Mail list logo
