Lenovo 110s Laptop - bug or unsupported hardware?

I decided to post this in misc because I am not sure if this a bug or unsupported hardware. It is a Lenovo 110s laptop. Apm works on this machine. Suspend and resume work on this machine. When running X, and doing things that require a lot of memory (open firefox and watch a youtube video + 3

Re: Chrome crashes with 6.2

> I've just tried Iridium, from UX it's basically Chromium from 6.1 - > The i386 package of Chrome on 6.1 was slow Folks, this is misc@ not ports@ or wishes@ !

Re: pf integration with dhcpd

On 10/27/17 12:04, Sonic wrote: On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Carlos Cardenas wrote: On a 6.2-syspatch box, I wanted to start leveraging the pf integration dhcpd pfctl -t dhcpd_X -T show Do you see the current leases in "/var/db/dhcpd.leases"? A "reserved" address

Re: pf integration with dhcpd

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Carlos Cardenas wrote: > On a 6.2-syspatch box, I wanted to start leveraging the pf integration dhcpd > pfctl -t dhcpd_X -T show Do you see the current leases in "/var/db/dhcpd.leases"? A "reserved" address would not show up there, nor

pf integration with dhcpd

Howdy. On a 6.2-syspatch box, I wanted to start leveraging the pf integration dhcpd has with the * Abandoned * Changed * Leased tables. In pf, as a first step I added the table definitions: table persist table persist table persist and loaded the rules. Then added the respective flags to

Re: Chrome crashes with 6.2

Cág writes: > I've just tried Iridium, from UX it's basically Chromium from 6.1 - > gtk2, none of that dreadfull new design - whoever thought that it was a > good idea to add A LOT of space, make letters even smaller and of an > almost indistinguishable from the background

Re: Chrome crashes with 6.2

> Iridium is based on Chromium, isn't it slow on an i386 too? > I actually would rather see Pale Moon or GTK+2 Chromium (as a separate > package/flavour). I've just tried Iridium, from UX it's basically Chromium from 6.1 - gtk2, none of that dreadfull new design - whoever thought that it was a

Re: Chrome crashes with 6.2

On 10/27/17 17:58, Cág wrote: > Dumitru Mișu Moldovan wrote: > >> If anyone wonders if there's still a usable (possibly full-blown) >> browser for i386, I'm running SeaMonkey and Iridium (the latter for some >> web apps, such as Google Music). Firefox has got too bloated, >> especially since

Re: Chrome crashes with 6.2

Dumitru Mișu Moldovan wrote: > If anyone wonders if there's still a usable (possibly full-blown) > browser for i386, I'm running SeaMonkey and Iridium (the latter for some > web apps, such as Google Music). Firefox has got too bloated, > especially since 52.x builds (starting with 6.1) use

Re: Chrome crashes with 6.2 (Please update official download sites!)

Federico Giannici wrote: > As this snapshot package will soon disappear for new ones with incompatible > dependences, I think that it would be VERY useful for A LOT of people that > this package be put in the official download sites. They would have to wait for 6.3 or follow -current. -- caóc

Re: mandoc output paper size

[ sending this particular one back to the list because it contains something useful for everyone and nothing private ] Hi Jan, Jan Stary wrote on Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:46:00PM +0200: > I produced a PS output with "man -Tps rm > rm.ps", > with output paper set to a3, a4, and a5 in man.conf.

Re: mandoc output paper size

Hi Walter, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote on Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:12:21PM +0200: > First of all, I'm just a user like you trying to figure out > how things work. So am I. That's how it starts. I also read documentation, standards, and code at need, and start fixing them once i understand

Re: mandoc output paper size

In article <20171027104221.gd9...@www.stare.cz> Jan Stary wrote: > On Oct 27 12:12:21, w...@roquesor.com wrote: > > In article <20171026193138.ga41...@www.stare.cz> Jan Stary > > wrote: > > > > > > In the ps file generated by mandoc you should have this line: > > >

Re: mandoc output paper size

On Oct 27 12:12:21, w...@roquesor.com wrote: > In article <20171026193138.ga41...@www.stare.cz> Jan Stary > wrote: > > > > > In the ps file generated by mandoc you should have this line: > > > > > > > > > > %%DocumentMedia: Default 595 841 0 () () > > > > > > > > > > Where 595

Re: mandoc output paper size

In article <20171026193138.ga41...@www.stare.cz> Jan Stary wrote: > > > > In the ps file generated by mandoc you should have this line: > > > > > > > > %%DocumentMedia: Default 595 841 0 () () > > > > > > > > Where 595 841 correspond to A4. If you set output paper to "letter"

Re: Chrome crashes with 6.2

On 10/26/17 14:26, Cág wrote: > Federico Giannici wrote: > >> Since I upgraded from OBSD 6.1 to 6.2 (amd64), at least half the time I >> launch Chrome it crashes (with a "use after free"). > > We had a discussion in the ports@ list a couple of days ago: > https://marc.info/?t=15085986372=1=2

Re: Chrome crashes with 6.2 (Please update official download sites!)

On 10/26/17 13:26, Cág wrote: Federico Giannici wrote: Since I upgraded from OBSD 6.1 to 6.2 (amd64), at least half the time I launch Chrome it crashes (with a "use after free"). We had a discussion in the ports@ list a couple of days ago: https://marc.info/?t=15085986372=1=2 I

Re: Need help setting http headers using relayd (and httpd)

Hi again! So, read the book as suggested, got relayd working, headers set, HTTP methods blocked just like I wanted (on my "test" box). However, when starting to use TLS-by-relayd rather than by httpd, it seems I lost OCSP stapling support. Does relayd.conf understand a line like tls ocsp

Re: Openbsd 6.1 and Current Console Freezes and lockup Proxmox PVE5.0

Hello Theo, Mike, All, @Theo Understood it is important to protect developers and the project goals ... @Mike Thanks for your Generosity in the time you took on this thread, Yes I want Mike to make VMM more awesome :) @Mike keep up the good work I cant disagree with any point that Theo made in