Fri, 17 Aug 2018 16:48:52 + Rupert Gallagher
> This is a really nice board at a really nice price, and you should
> stop scaring people off. These Atoms are cleaner than both Cores and
> Xeons, and AMDs have have their fair share of problems. Citin g
> C2000 against the latest C3000 is FUD.
Dear Friends,
IPSEC+L2TP fails with the following messages on IPSEC router:
isakmpd[76756]: message_recv: cleartext phase 2
isakmpd[76756]: dropped message from
192.168.1.1 port 500 due to notification type INVALID_FLAGS Aug 17
isakmpd[76756]: transport_send_messages: giving up on
exchange peer-d
Hello,
I was checking bridge's protected domains and I'm curious
how to add VMM VM's tap into a VMM switch/bridge protected domain.
It seems it's not implemented yet.
I wanted to achieve this:
- multiple VMM VMs in same switch/bridge
- VMs cannot talk to each other inside the bridge
hence pro
This is a really nice board at a really nice price, and you should stop scaring
people off. These Atoms are cleaner than both Cores and Xeons, and AMDs have
have their fair share of problems. Citin g C2000 against the latest C3000 is
FUD. You should come clean first, and cite a comparable serv
Fri, 17 Aug 2018 11:15:32 + Rupert Gallagher
> FUD
>
> Sent from total and utter ignorance.
Rupert,
Plus the dmesg you posted is by the RAM disk installation OpenBSD kernel.
You Should complete an actual OpenBSD installation to get the full dmesg.
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:24, wrote:
>
FUD
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 12:24, wrote:
> Fri, 17 Aug 2018 06:23:23 + Rupert Gallagher
>> Using the serial over lan console, the keyboard keeps working, and it is
>> possible to enter the shell. Using the standard console, the keyboard does
>> not work. Ther
Fri, 17 Aug 2018 06:23:23 + Rupert Gallagher
> Using the serial over lan console, the keyboard keeps working, and it is
> possible to enter the shell. Using the standard console, the keyboard does
> not work. There is plenty of drivers that need to be written. No, I do not
> write/port driv
Solene Rapenne wrote:
Eric Huiban wrote:
Hello,
With "6.3 release" version, i'm unable to set swap priority with fstab
using the following :
2e04cb867188f137.b none swap sw,priority=0
e7f9094bf357d407.b none swap sw,priority=1
I get the following result :
$ swapctl
Device 512-blocks
Hello,
Functionnally pf is OK : packets are blocked or passed according to
what's expected. But when i use systat for live examination of what
appends amongst the rules there is no hit on match rules with IP list
while there's on relevant block rule.
Did someone notice such behaviour, or did
Eric Huiban wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With "6.3 release" version, i'm unable to set swap priority with fstab
> using the following :
>
> 2e04cb867188f137.b none swap sw,priority=0
> e7f9094bf357d407.b none swap sw,priority=1
>
> I get the following result :
>
> $ swapctl
> Device 512-blocks
Using the serial over lan console, the keyboard keeps working, and it is
possible to enter the shell. Using the standard console, the keyboard does not
work. There is plenty of drivers that need to be written. No, I do not
write/port drivers.
By comparison, both freebsd and centos linux just wo
Hello,
With "6.3 release" version, i'm unable to set swap priority with fstab
using the following :
2e04cb867188f137.b none swap sw,priority=0
e7f9094bf357d407.b none swap sw,priority=1
I get the following result :
$ swapctl
Device 512-blocks Used Avail Capacity Priority
/dev/sd
12 matches
Mail list logo
