My take

2021-10-28 Thread Sylvain S
First of my requirement: merge fingers with your keys, to type afayc. twitter.com/batlaizanpa

Re: boot error: 'entry point at 0xffffffff81001000'

2021-10-28 Thread Mike Larkin
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:26:33PM -0500, J Dragu wrote: > Trying with a snapshot returned the same error. > > Here's what it tells me when I check machine memory: > > > Low ram: 634KB High ram: 3065328KB > > Total free memory: 8179378KB > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 20:04 Mike Larkin wrote: > > > O

Re: boot error: 'entry point at 0xffffffff81001000'

2021-10-28 Thread J Dragu
Trying with a snapshot returned the same error. Here's what it tells me when I check machine memory: > Low ram: 634KB High ram: 3065328KB > Total free memory: 8179378KB On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 20:04 Mike Larkin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:57:46PM -0500, J Dragu wrote: > > Hello, > > >

Re: boot error: 'entry point at 0xffffffff81001000'

2021-10-28 Thread Mike Larkin
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:57:46PM -0500, J Dragu wrote: > Hello, > > I know there was a previous thread here about a perhaps similar issue > with 6.8 (?), but since from what I can tell it was fixed with 6.9 > I figured I'd ask about my problem. If there's something obvious I'm > missing I do apol

boot error: 'entry point at 0xffffffff81001000'

2021-10-28 Thread J Dragu
Hello, I know there was a previous thread here about a perhaps similar issue with 6.8 (?), but since from what I can tell it was fixed with 6.9 I figured I'd ask about my problem. If there's something obvious I'm missing I do apologize! I'm trying to install OpenBSD 7.0 on a Thinkpad T410 from a

Re: use pfctl to reread /etc/mail/spamd-white table

2021-10-28 Thread Mischa
On 2021-10-28 12:58, Otto Moerbeek wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:55:33AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: Hi folks, my pf.conf contains table persist file "/etc/mail/spamd-white" I understand that I can add and delete hosts from the table manually later, but on very large tables

Re: use pfctl to reread /etc/mail/spamd-white table

2021-10-28 Thread Theo de Raadt
>> I don't know how atomic that is: is the table either empty >> or does it contain all the addresses in the file? I would >> guess the addresses are added as they are read, just like >> when you add them manually. >> > >That is a wrong guess. pf tries to do things atomically when it makes >sense

Re: use pfctl to reread /etc/mail/spamd-white table

2021-10-28 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:15:45PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > On Oct 28 11:55:33, harald.dun...@aixigo.com wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > my pf.conf contains > > > > table persist file "/etc/mail/spamd-white" > > > > I understand that I can add and delete hosts from the table manually > >

Re: use pfctl to reread /etc/mail/spamd-white table

2021-10-28 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:55:33AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > my pf.conf contains > > table persist file "/etc/mail/spamd-white" > > I understand that I can add and delete hosts from the table manually > later, but on very large tables this is pretty painful. There i

Re: use pfctl to reread /etc/mail/spamd-white table

2021-10-28 Thread Jan Stary
On Oct 28 11:55:33, harald.dun...@aixigo.com wrote: > Hi folks, > > my pf.conf contains > > table persist file "/etc/mail/spamd-white" > > I understand that I can add and delete hosts from the table manually > later, but on very large tables this is pretty painful. > There is a high r

Re: use pfctl to reread /etc/mail/spamd-white table

2021-10-28 Thread Zé Loff
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:55:33AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > my pf.conf contains > > table persist file "/etc/mail/spamd-white" > > I understand that I can add and delete hosts from the table manually > later, but on very large tables this is pretty painful. There

use pfctl to reread /etc/mail/spamd-white table

2021-10-28 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi folks, my pf.conf contains table persist file "/etc/mail/spamd-white" I understand that I can add and delete hosts from the table manually later, but on very large tables this is pretty painful. There is a high risk that the table has just been flushed and is not up-to-date yet,