2010/9/13 Anton Maksimenkov :
> 2010/9/13 Claudio Jeker :
>> When running with that many sockets a prominent warning about increasing
>> kern.maxclusters shows up. This is not just dmesg spam, running
>> out of mbuf clusters will stop your network stack.
>
> I've
2010/9/13 Claudio Jeker :
> When running with that many sockets a prominent warning about increasing
> kern.maxclusters shows up. This is not just dmesg spam, running
> out of mbuf clusters will stop your network stack.
I've not seen any message neither on console nor in logs.
I tried to set kern
2010/9/13 Bret S. Lambert :
> yes, because you've soaked up all the memory that's available for
> handling incoming/outgoing network traffic; you've got a bunch of
> processes that try to grab a limited number of resources, fail to
> get all they need, and sleep while holding already-allocated mbuf
2010/9/13 Henning Brauer :
>> hangs. 1-2 sec after start.
>> --- interrupt ---
>> pool_do_get(d0a10b60,0,0,0,60) at pool_do_get+0x2c2
>> pool_get(d0a10b60,0,8000,0,0) at pool_get+0x54
>> m_gethdr(1,1,8000,369e99,0) at m_gethdr+0x39
> too me that simply looks like you are running out of memo
Hello.
I use my OBSD machine to test some server on another machine. They are
connected by pathcord, 1Gbit network cards are used.
Test program (uses kqueue) do many (I want thousands) connections to
server. Write query, read answer.
And it tries to keep that much connections by doing as much new
c
I want add keyword to PF's rule. I started with pfctl. Suppose I want
to add keyword "spraychld".
So, I add field to struct pf_rule (as showed in diff below) and tried
to add keyword to pfctl's parse.y processor.
But it won't to compile.
Where I was wrong?
# cd/usr/src/sbin/pfctl
# make clean &&
> we already do some mitigation for that in certain drivers.
> $ cd /sys/dev; grep MCLGETI pci/* ic/*
...
Oh, that's great to hear! I missed.
29 MAQ 2009 G. 13:28 POLXZOWATELX irix NAPISAL:
> And then you're going to add a dropper ?
You had to try "man MCLGETI" before asking here. At least.
--
an
2009/5/28 SJP Lists :
> In other words, doing it on the incoming is pointless. Thus, as in
> your examples, the logic behind shaping only on the outbound.
>
> i.e.You can easily delay sending something you have, but you have
> little to no control over the ingress traffic of a link where only the
May I ask about what is the current state of rthreads library? It was
cool to hear about this excellent project, but I found nothing in
tech@ and misc@ since old time...
--
engineer
> OpenBSD has an isp(4) driver, as 'man isp' will tell you. Nothing
> obviously ServeRAIDish in there, though.
FreeBSD's ServeRAID driver is ips, not isp. isp is for QLogic controllers.
Yes, my wrong, sorry. Of course, mean "ips".
So, who can say, what with it currently? May it be ported (as
Aside from the other comments, I'll add that aac(4) was disabled because
it was buggy and Adaptec wouldn't provide documentation.
Theo was quite clear about this at the time, see the 3.8 release notes.
Ok, I remember about situation with Adaptec... But what with "isp"
driver (from FreeBSD)? Afte
Joachim Schipper wrote:
> 'not configured' typically means the kernel knows what it is, but
> doesn't know what to do with it.
More specifically, it means that the kernel knows the PCI device's ID
and vendor, but doesn't have a driver to hook it to.
FreeBSD supports it with the ips driver and it a
(Sorry, previous was with not correct my sender's email, please reply
to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Reading through misc archives I found this post
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=112454454105020&w=2
Currently I got number of IBM ServeRAID 4M controllers (plus
batteries packs) in couple wi
Hi.
Reading through misc archives I found this post
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=112454454105020&w=2
Currently I got number of IBM ServeRAID 4M controllers (plus
batteries packs) in couple with some IBM machines (eServer 6BY and
some other models). It's dramatic for me because o
Hi.
Just installed 3.9 on (some kind of) old IBM eServer machine with
Adaptec AIC-7899 U160 controllers and 3 SCSI disks - , and 2
. Installation was on ST318305LC (sd0).
And as I can see, disk speed is slowly... "systat iostat" show < 1000
at "rKBps wKBps" and when I try un "tar -xzpf" ports and
Hi.
Actually I don't know about usefulness my information but...
I have another machine - on Intel 7501VW2 with 2 Xeon. And I have
Intel SRCZCR RAID controller there.
So, with uniprocessor kernel it's recognized and work fine -
there is 3 SCSI acting and seen as one (RAID5) disk. desg follow
(ac
16 matches
Mail list logo
