Not wanting to end up in your killfile, but... what I've noticed is that I
don't see any English-language spam at all on any of the lists. What I do see
when periodically checking my junk folders for false positives is spam in
Spanish, Russian, and maybe a bit of Chinese, French, and Portuguese.
Am 14 Apr 2010 um 10:11 schrieb Zachary Uram:
As a long time Linux user I will soon try out OpenBSD, I have been
reading the list emails and contacted 1 OpenBSD top person who was
very rude. There is some of the "RTFM" or "get lost" attitude in
Linux, but if a questioner seems sincere there is u
Am 14 Apr 2010 um 14:50 schrieb Theo de Raadt:
I guess this is the "get lost" mail he is referring to.
Yes, it is a damn fair assessment. When you pay your taxes, do you go
make a personal request for assistance of your prime minister?
Your mail lies about what you saw, so here is the full ex
Am 9 Dec 2009 um 19:01 schrieb Christopher Zimmermann:
On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:38:56 -0500
Jason Dixon wrote:
How does the announcement of new releases for ComixWall
help OpenBSD?
It helps in promoting OpenBSD. And this is the official
purpose of the advocasy mailing list.
So I think that an
Am 11 Dec 2009 um 09:19 schrieb P-O Yliniemi:
There are a lot more abuse of the misc list than Soner posting about
his OpenBSD project. Maybe Theo should install a decent spam filter
for the lists ?
This is levelling down a distinction: there's spam that's definitely
spam and can be filte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 11 Dec 2009 um 09:19 schrieb P-O Yliniemi:
There are a lot more abuse of the misc list than Soner posting about
his OpenBSD project. Maybe Theo should install a decent spam filter
for the lists ?
Just a few of the recent ones:
From: Commonw
Am 10 Dec 2009 um 23:00 schrieb Marco Peereboom:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:00:34PM -0500, nixlists wrote:
Hmmm. I've used hardware raid cards for mirrors that have the
verify function.
It would be interesting to know how and what those cards do.
They read the data to make sure the disk is
I've been playing around with this lately, so I'm happy to have a stab
at an answer, with the caveat that this reflects a recollection of my
reading of the code rather than any attempt to make it work to your
requirements. Whatever I may fail to clarify, recall, or understand is
best taken
According to http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Guest_OSes:
"Requires VT-x or AMD-V hardware virtualization support."
It would appear they've therefore made VT-x and friends non-
configurable. You can file a bug report and see where that goes.
Am 20 Dec 2009 um 10:18 schrieb Tomas Bodzar:
> Hi all
Formal evaluation just means that the features judged relevant to the
evaluation can be minimally verified. On the flip side, there's David
Litchfield's observation in the introduction to The Oracle Hacker's
Handbook: "The Oracle RDBMS was evaluated under Common Criteria to
EAL4... However,
I'd venture that your professor isn't particularly well-educated if he
thinks BSD is dead or dying from either a commercial or a pedagogical
perspective. A considerable amount of literature on the subject of
networking is written using the BSD codebase as reference (e.g. the
Richard Stevens TCP/IP
The last mail I can find on the subject seems to indicate that there were
problems getting RPC to work with ipv6 (from Henning:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=120291072230011&w=3). I'm not sure if this
was for lack of a TI-RPC implementation or other reasons. Any info on where
this is?
[demime
se laid out and an acceptable
alternative more clearly articulated.
Cheers,
Bayard
On 27 Oct 2010, at 17:54, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Bayard Bell [2010-10-27 17:19]:
>> Sorry, but it's not entirely clear where the obstacles are. Is this
>> unhappiness with the specification(s
To judge from the question I don't think you've accurately parsed the
argument, which isn't so much about IPv6 per se as about how IETF corrects the
mistakes that invariably result in specifying more ambitious protocols like
IPv6 or NFSv4 (or doesn't and precludes itself from doing so).
If you non
The simple answer as to why OCSP isn't itself via HTTPS is that this would be
a cyclical dependency: if you need to accept a certificate, you need to
confirm its continuing validity. If you have to use a connection relying on
that same logic to confirm validity, at what point are you then able to m
Surely there are two separate problems here: 1) you think OpenBSD needs to
work to open up loopholes so that people who aren't donating or aren't
donating as much because of tax reasons will now do so (and Amit thinks this
is a series of technical problems that can be solved by non-strategic and
so
16 matches
Mail list logo
